Skip to main content
The Daily Eudemon

The Daily Eudemon

By Eric Scheske

A weekly podcast focused on the problem of modernity: Its rejection of the Tao. Related topics: What is the Tao? Why was it rejected? How does its rejection manifest itself in modernity and postmodernity?
Available on
Apple Podcasts Logo
Castbox Logo
Google Podcasts Logo
Overcast Logo
Pocket Casts Logo
RadioPublic Logo
Spotify Logo
Currently playing episode

The Gnostic Believes His Paradise is a Historic Inevitability and His Movement Will Bring It About

The Daily EudemonFeb 06, 2023

00:00
15:07
Existence Strikes Back and The Hemisphere Hypothesis: A Summary
Apr 18, 202318:52
How to Brand Yourself
Feb 27, 202306:13
The Gnostic Hates the Structure
Feb 20, 202313:51
The Gnostic Believes His Paradise is a Historic Inevitability and His Movement Will Bring It About

The Gnostic Believes His Paradise is a Historic Inevitability and His Movement Will Bring It About

Parts IV and V of an Analysis of Eric Voegelin's Six Gnostic Traits

Alienation is the Marxist bugbear. He sees alienation everywhere because it emanates from the economic substructure and works its way through the socio-political superstructure. Natural economic evolution would eliminate it, but the ruling classes are suppressing the evolution out of self-interest, so a revolution needs to bring about the evolution.

Show notes here

Feb 06, 202315:07
The Gnostic is a Believer

The Gnostic is a Believer

Did you take a sociology class in high school or college?

Did you know sociology’s founder, August Comte (1798-1857), was kind of a dick? The Encyclopedia Britannica says he was “ungrateful,” “self-centered,” and “egocentric.” If those aren’t bad enough, other biographers say he was a megalomaniac, cruel, and downright nuts.

Comte, on the other hand, considered himself a relevant man, to put it modestly. He was born at the end of the Enlightenment and fully embraced its ideals,[1]which Isaiah Berlin summarized as:

1.            Every genuine question can be answered. If it can’t be answered, it’s not a genuine question.

2.            The answers to the questions can be discovered, learned, and taught.

3.            All the answers are compatible with one another.

Those ideals are captured perfectly by science. Science is the discipline of power: it answers questions and puts them into neat boxes. Physics is especially good at this.

Comte concluded that the principles of physics could be applied to society: “social physics” is what he initially called it before calling it “sociology.”

By applying scientific findings and mathematical truths to social interactions, the government and its intellectual advisers could greatly improve society.

He was positive it would work. He was so positive, in fact, that he popularized the term “Positivism” to describe his and other contemporary academics’ extremely positive expectations of science

Comte was hailed as an academic hero. The French erected statues and monuments in his honor and named streets after him. He had replaced the hidebound restrictions of tradition, king, and pope with the only thing that could be trusted: science, bolstered by math. No more religion, just facts.

SHOW NOTES HERE

Jan 23, 202310:51
Why We Judge. And Why We Need to Stop
Jan 16, 202312:26
The Gnostic Never Blames Himself
Jan 09, 202319:09
These Six Traits Make a Person a Gnostic

These Six Traits Make a Person a Gnostic

A Diagnostic of the Gnostic

Eric Voegelin was to modern gnosticism what Knute Rockne was to Notre Dame football. Rockne didn’t start the ND football program and Voegelin didn’t discover modern gnosticism, but they took their subjects to much higher levels.

The Swiss theologian, Hans urs Von Balthasar was supposedly the first person to draw parallels between the ancient gnostic heresy and modern theories in Prometheus (1937), which examined modern German thought. Albert Camus did a similar thing with modern French thought in The Rebel (1951).[1]

But Voegelin took the strain of thought much further in The New Science of Politics (1952). The book became a Time cover story and, voila, gnosticism was in the limelight, a least among nerds.

Granted, later in life, Voegelin said he wasn’t sure “gnosticism” was the best term to use and thought perhaps it received too much attention, but he didn’t remotely conclude that the term didn’t work. Far from it. Later in life, at age 67, he published his most popular work, Science, Politics and Gnosticism (1968).

Remaining Show Notes Here

Dec 05, 202214:07
A Dozen Quotes from Prometheus Bound: A Play about Spiritual Disease
Nov 21, 202214:06
The Tao: The Transcendental Router
Nov 14, 202216:21
Voegelin’s New Science of Politics Put Gnosticism Back into Our Awareness
Nov 07, 202214:41
Solon was a Man of the Tao
Oct 31, 202210:33
Why David Hume is Important
Oct 24, 202212:50
The First Amendment’s Separation of Church and State Goes Back to 500 BC
Oct 17, 202215:33
Introducing Eric Voegelin
Oct 10, 202220:40
We're All Machiavellians Now
Sep 26, 202211:11
Keep Sweet and Have Sex

Keep Sweet and Have Sex

A 50-year-old man had ritual sex with a 12-year-old girl while adult women assisted.

And everyone was cool with it.

That’s just part of the bizarre story told in Netflix’s Keep Sweet: Pray and Obey and the exploits of its prophet, Warren Jeffs.

Keep Sweet’s Fascination

It’s the story of a renegade Mormon group that still practice polygamy. Vigorous polygamy, especially the type that lets old men bang young women and, occasionally, girls.

It’s the kind of thing that disgusts, but it also arouses, at least at some level. Sex sells for a reason. Keep Sweet did, its IMDB rating currently sitting at 7.3 with 11,000 reviews (Netflix’s Murder Mountain, which enjoyed the endorsement of Joe Rogan, sits at 6.8 with 3,200 reviews).

But I don’t think sex is the only reason Keep Sweetfascinates.

I think it fascinates because, although everyone understands the sex part, they can’t understand how an entire culture could allow such a thing to occur.

If It Doesn’t Fit, Put It on the Shelf

The docuseries tries to explain it, but every interview or explanation came down to the same thing: it’s how these people were raised. It was the only thing these people knew. They were raised in a polygamous culture that celebrated their prophet. If the prophet told girls to do something—or someone—they did it/him.

If something didn’t make sense, they were told to “put it on the shelf.”

And just as the lechery of old men resonates with all men at some level, this kind of rationality resonates too.

These girls who submitted to sex with old men, the parents who gave their consent the women who participated in the erotic ritual: they acted rationally.

It’s All Rational

That’s the real dirty secret in the docuseries and another reason why, besides the sex, it fascinates.

We’re all capable of such a thing.

Not because of our nethers.

But because of our brains.


Show notes here

Sep 19, 202212:35
How to Cure Yourself of Modernitis
Sep 12, 202212:42
Seven Early Symptoms of the Mental Disease “Modernitis”

Seven Early Symptoms of the Mental Disease “Modernitis”

Your reason isn’t reasonable.

Stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

And smoke it and smoke it and smoke it, until you smoke rationality out of your head, until a love for the absurd fills your lungs, and until you breathe the fresh air of freedom.

Let me explain.

“I Don’t See Why”

When I look back over my adult life and wince at the unfortunate things I did, there’s a common theme: the inner dialogue that began and concluded with, “I don’t see why” or its negative shade, “I don’t see why not.” I didn’t see why, or see why not, so I did X, Y, or Z. And X, Y, or Z turned out awful for me or others.

Most of us carry the assumption that we can do whatever we want unless our reason tells us not to.

Unfortunately, this tends to be almost identical to the assumption that we can do whatever we want. As Pascal said, as Freud argued, as current studies about cognitive biases show: our minds aren’t nearly as reasonable as we think.

It’s one thing to spend long hours in study, contemplation, and dialogue with advisers and friends to form your conscience when it comes to a weighty matter. It’s another thing to do something merely because your reason doesn’t explain why you shouldn’t.

The former is a sign of wisdom. The latter is a sign that your mind suffers from Modernitis.

Definition

Modernitis”: A mental disease, rarely diagnosed, marked by intuitive confidence in one’s ideas and the findings of science.

It’s rarely diagnosed for the same reason a rational fish wouldn’t know it’s wet. A mental disease that afflicts everyone becomes a sign of mental health.

Descartes was the main philosopher that spread Modernitis. There were other causes and other philosophers contributed, sure, but he was the main culprit.

He died in 1650, a celebrity and conqueror. His ideas had spread; his ideas had won. Modernitis became a sign of mental health.

The effects were seen everywhere.


Show notes here

Sep 05, 202214:14
When Western Civilization Submitted Itself to a Lobotomy
Aug 29, 202212:53
Descartes Praised Lycurgus. It’s Our Earliest Glimpse of the Problem with Modernist Thinking

Descartes Praised Lycurgus. It’s Our Earliest Glimpse of the Problem with Modernist Thinking

Descartes, by placing ultimate importance on one's ideas, gave credibility to the outrageous ideas that littered modernity.

Lycurgus put the “Spartan” into Sparta.

Before Lycurgus, Sparta was like other Greek cities. Its citizens sang, celebrated love and good food, wrote poetry, and crafted fine pottery.

After Lycurgus, Sparta became grim and tough, determined to keep its slave class under control despite the daunting slave-to-citizen ratio (10:1?).

Music, poetry, fine pottery, and good food vanished. Family and love remained, but in twisted forms.

Men were discouraged from marrying small wives. Men with vigorous wives were encouraged to lend them to vigorous men. Men who grew too old to service their young wives were expected to make her available to young men.

The newborn was brought before a state council of inspectors. If rejected, the baby was thrown from a cliff.

At age seven, boys were removed from their families and raised by the state in barracks. Martial training was everything and done in the nude. The teachers provoked quarrels among the boys so they’d fight. An annual ritual involved whipping several boys until their blood stained the ground. At age 12, each boy received only one garment to wear for the year. He was not allowed to bathe much and was required to sleep in the open, on a bed of rushes. He was taught to read and write, but barely. He was taught to forage and steal. Stealth was valued above all, and getting caught doing whatever—stealing, trying to bang one’s own wife—brought punishment (great shame, flogging, etc.). At age 30, if the boy survived all this, he was admitted to full citizenship.

Show notes here

Aug 22, 202211:43
This Monk Understands David Foster Wallace
Aug 15, 202211:35
Jack Kerouac: The Tao on Steroids

Jack Kerouac: The Tao on Steroids

Aug 08, 202212:30
New Course/Newsletter: Raising Intellectually-Sound Children. Maybe
Aug 01, 202211:35
Montaigne: Godfather of 4Chan?
Jul 25, 202212:01
71 Thoughts to Improve Your Thoughts

71 Thoughts to Improve Your Thoughts

Show notes here

1. The wise know they start each morning as beginners. Robin Daniels

2. "In the intellectual order, the virtue of humility is nothing more nor less than the power of attention." Simone Weil

3. "My experience is what I agree to attend to." William James

4. "To enjoy the kind of experience you want rather than enduring the kind that you feel stuck with, you have to take charge of your attention." Winifred Gallagher, Rapt

5. "Choice of attention--to pay attention to this and ignore that--is to the inner life what choice of action is to the outer. In both cases, a man is responsible for his choice and must accept the consequences, whatever they may be." W.H. Auden

6. Your life is the sum of what you focus on. Winifred Gallagher

7. "The greatest weapon against stress is our ability to choose one thought over another." William James

8. "Attention is the withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others." William James

9. The best response to distractions is no response. Robin Daniels

10. "Energy flows where attention goes." Amishi Jha

11. If you stay focused on the right things, your life will stop being a mere reaction to circumstances but rather a work of art. Winifred Gallagher

12. Every saint's life is a work of art.

13. Being focused is the next best thing to being happy. Winifred Gallagher

14. Resign yourself to mere concentration, and you might get some happiness too.

Jul 18, 202214:57
Why Francis Bacon is a Founding Father of Modernity

Why Francis Bacon is a Founding Father of Modernity

Show notes here.

Bacon’s books proposed a new method of inquiry.

In technical language, he proposed that we rely on induction instead of deduction.

Put a little more simply: Instead of trying to deduce truth from a priori principles and making our observations match the principles, he said we should make our observations and reach a posteriori conclusions from the observations.

Put as simply as possible: Instead of using dogmas to tell us what the science says, let’s just see what the science says.

Bacon was very serious about the rejection of dogmas. He admonished readers to eliminate “Idols” that cloud scientific studies and conclusions. His was a complete rejection of metaphysics when it came to the realm of physics. Separation of church and science. He is properly considered the Father of Empiricism.


Jul 11, 202213:57
Top Ten Mystics of the 14th Century

Top Ten Mystics of the 14th Century

The fourteenth century was an era of singular richness in the history of Christian mysticism. Frank Tobin, Henry Suso, The Exemplar, with Two German Sermons.

The 1300s. Europe in the grips of economic depression, war, and natural catastrophes. Europe still experiencing the spiritual wake left by the lives of Saints Francis and Dominic. A deep concern with the interior life seized large numbers of people, both clergy and laity, and the pursuit of inwardness became an intense and exclusive goal of many.

The ones who made the most progress were like today’s American Idol contestants. They made it to the top and everyone wanted to listen to them.

10. Richard Rolle (1300–1349)

“Little wonder when a man is first made a true contemplative, and tastes the sweetness and then feels the warmth, that he almost dies through excess of love.”

Richard Rolle: ladies’ man. Women were a source of temptation in his youth, an object of tender concern as a spiritual father in his prime. Most of his written works are devotions for his female listeners. Our culture can’t imagine this, of course. Or rather, our culture can imagine this only too much, letting its imagination run to the lascivious. He lived 31 of his 49 years as a hermit. The only Englishman on this list. Never canonized, but inspired a flourishing cult in England, where his books were more widely read than Chaucer’s in the 1400s. Sometimes credited as the first master of English prose.

9. Gerard Groote (1340–1384)

All show notes here

Jul 04, 202217:18
Blaise Pascal: First Anti-Modern

Blaise Pascal: First Anti-Modern

Show notes here

Rene Descartes was kind of a dick.

His famous saying, “I think, therefore I am,” is nothing less than a wholesale rejection of all authority—even objective truth—in favor of a defecated rationality and fierce subjectivism that belittles anything outside one’s own mind.

The modern attitude created by Descartes does two things:

1. It enshrines one’s own beliefs or preferences as the exclusive source of truth (fierce subjectivism).

2. It elevates the logic that flows from that fierce subjectivism (defecated rationality) into a truth (my truth, your truth, his/her/its truth, etc.).

If you draw a thick cocaine line from Descartes to today’s Trans Wars, you’d be drawing coke lines better than Hunter Thompson.

Accused of being an atheist, Descartes claimed to be a “devout Catholic,”[i]but he left his Catholic France to live among the Calvinists and Jews in the Netherlands. He espouses odd (and bizarre) theories about the soul. He spent his final days as the court philosopher for the Lutheran Queen Christina of Sweden and died without Last Rites.

One academic thinks that Descartes was such a poor Catholic that a priest thought his example would prevent Queen Christina from converting to Catholicism, so the priest poisoned the father of modernity by lacing a host with arsenic. The story doesn’t ring true—a priest who cares enough about Catholicism wouldn’t desecrate the host like that—but hey, the Queen converted after Descartes’ death so maybe.

The Pope thought Descartes was kind of a dick. Urban VIII put Descartes’ writings on the Index of Forbidden Books about a dozen years after Descartes died.

Pascal Surpassed Descartes

But most people thought Descartes was brilliant. He was the toast of Europe. But Descartes wasn’t the smartest guy in Europe. Heck, he wasn’t even the smartest guy in France.

A young upstart was his intellectual superior. Descartes knew it and resented it (did I mention Descartes was kind of a dick?).

When the 16-year-old Blaise Pascal published a mathematical paper on conic sections when Descartes was 43, Descartes knew he’d been eclipsed when he was at the height of his intellectual power and reputation. At first, he refused to believe someone as young as Pascal could’ve written something so impressive, but when he learned that it was true, Descartes turned to belittling him. When Pascal invented the syringe and the hydraulic press, Descartes mocked him and said Pascal had “too much vacuum in his head.”

Jun 27, 202213:05
Four Quirky Post-WWI Utopians
Jun 20, 202210:02
Mystical Erections, Violence, and Theft

Mystical Erections, Violence, and Theft

No, that isn’t a passage above the front door of Jeffrey Epstein’s residence on Little Saint James.

It’s a popular saying of a medieval sect known as the “Brethren of the Free Spirit,” which has long been regarded, according to historian Norman Cohn, as “one of the most perplexing and mysterious phenomena in medieval history.”

So perplexing, in fact, that Cohn himself conflated a genuine mystic, Henry Suso (1300-1366), with the Brethren. Suso, a disciple of Meister Eckhart, was one of the most Zen-like mystics in Christian history. Zen has Gnostic tendencies, but Suso was a legitimate mystic, as evidenced by his beatification in 1831.[1]

Suso lived in Cologne, Germany, which was the stronghold of the Brethren, but he was hardly like the Brethren of the Free Spirit.

Consider Suso's direct contemporary and fellow Colognian, John of Brunn, who lived at the Brethren’s House of Voluntary Poverty.

According to Brunn, since God is free, everything should be free: held in common. If anyone had more than he needed, it was merely so he could give them to the Brethren. If an adept ate at a tavern, he shouldn’t have to pay and, if the tavern keeper insisted on payment, he should be beaten. Cheating, theft, and violent robbery were all justified for Brethren adepts, according to John Brunn, who also testified in 1340 to lying, fornicating, orgies, incest, sodomy, and murder (including infanticide).

Show notes here

Jun 13, 202213:02
From Renaissance "Follow the Magic" to Modernity "Follow the Science"

From Renaissance "Follow the Magic" to Modernity "Follow the Science"

The Renaissance Believed in Magic Like Moderns Believe in Science

In 1598, a huge renegade friar organized a revolt to liberate Calabria from Spain.

Tommaso Campanella started the revolt with astrology: he announced to his followers that the stars portended great changes and revolution. He then added numerology, noting that the numbers agreed with the stars: the year 1600 was approaching and 16 is numerologically significant.[i]

The new century, Campanella preached, would mark the dawn of a new age—an age with a better religious cult, better moral laws, and an excellent ruler (to wit, Campanella, who thought he was astrologically destined to bring the world into the new age).

In order to prepare for the new age, Campanella taught it was first necessary to overthrow Spanish rule, but he believed so strongly in his personal magical powers and the magical signs that he scarcely prepared for Spain’s inevitable response. His “revolution” was quickly crushed and Campanella was imprisoned for 27 years.

During his imprisonment, he channeled his Utopian-magical desires into writing. In Citta del Sole (The City of the Sun), he drafted a blueprint for his ideal city, a mountain city ruled by a priest named Hoh. Hoh and his bureaucratic aides would rule over sex relations, which would be organized to bring about the best humans. There would be no mental or physical disabilities. All things would be held in common, including the women, and children would be raised by the community. Both sexes would be trained to fight. Everyone would work, but only four hours per day. Everyone would practice perfect virtue, and there would be no crime.[ii]

The City's structure would be dictated by astrology. It would be divided into seven divisions named after the seven planets (Neptune and Pluto hadn’t been discovered yet). The walls which divided each division would be covered with astrological depictions. In the middle of the City, there would be a vast temple with an altar containing a great "mappamondo" on which all the heavens would be depicted. The dome would contain the greatest stars with a listing of the powers each has over the earth. In short, Campanella's City was "a complete reflection of the world as governed by the laws of natural magic in dependence on the stars” and was "saturated through and through with astrology."[iii]

The Magical Renaissance

Remaining show notes here

Jun 06, 202215:56
The Black Arts Have No Nonsense About Them
May 30, 202216:30
150 Years that Shook Europe
May 23, 202208:17
The Satoshi Nakamoto of Mysticism
May 16, 202208:04
Dr. Faust and Mr. Lao-Tzu
May 09, 202209:43
We Golf. Therefore, the Tao is.
May 02, 202211:50
Thomas Aquinas: Pinnacle to Obsolescence in 200 Years and Why It Matters
Apr 25, 202210:28
How to Kill the Tao
Apr 18, 202213:29
Seven Great Quotes About Money
Apr 11, 202205:52
How Do We Account for Thomas Merton?
Apr 04, 202212:01
How to Survive the Atheistic Hurricane
Mar 28, 202218:04
How to Kill that Feeling of Thankfulness
Mar 21, 202209:40
How to Escape the Selfishness Paradox
Mar 14, 202208:36
Five Pieces of Furniture for Your Intellectual Living Room
Mar 07, 202210:24
How to Start Detaching the Door of Reality from its Hinges
Feb 28, 202208:57
How to Break on Through to the Other Side
Feb 21, 202207:44
Lady, You Have One Ugly Kid
Feb 15, 202207:05
Who Exactly is Trying to Take Down Joe Rogan

Who Exactly is Trying to Take Down Joe Rogan

The full-court breakdown of Joe Rogan has begun.

Neil Young started it when he demanded Spotify remove his music because Rogan permits a compelling COVID narrative to exist that violates the official narrative. The compelling COVID narrative is supposedly wrong and because we’re in a pandemic (which is waning, according to my most-recent issue of The Kiplinger Letter), it’s dangerous. Because it’s dangerous, it must be stopped.

That’s how the Neil Young logic runs.

And now we’re learning that he has significant financial ties to Pfizer. I guess Pfizer owns his music catalog, which presumably means there’s a financial symbiosis between Neil Young and Pfizer, but the heck if I know.

Complete Show Notes

Feb 07, 202209:30
An Elf Lays Down His Harp to Kill an Orc
Feb 02, 202210:37