Fresh AiR
By Answers in Reason - Joe Johnstone, Dave Rowlands, Martijn, Kristyn Pike & Guests
Philosophy, Science, and the intersection with social and secular issues is our main focus; we aim to ascend the tribe and do more than simply claim to be sceptics by actually taking the time to understand what scepticism is.
Season 1 first launched in 2019 and other authors became a part of the crew. Over time we grew and also undertook our live stream, the "SciPhi" show on YouTube
Fresh AiRNov 06, 2022
Discussions and The Burden of Proof – Podcast Version
Discussions and The Burden of Proof Posted on6th November 2022 ByDavidian
One of the problems with contemporary social media discourse is jumping around and ahead in the conversation, misusing terms, axioms, and similar and not taking the time to actually have a discussion and understand what the other person is saying.
We are too quick to judge people based on the group we think they belong to and forget to appreciate the nuance between positions. A Christian is judged by how we judge all Christians based on previous experiences with Christians. The same can be said for atheists, Muslims or any other group.
This form of tribalism and cognitive bias makes use too quick to assume positions, all entailed beliefs and rationality, and you find people just name fallacies (often incorrectly) instead of having a dialogue and reaching some accord.
Recap: We often fail to hold conversations and throw out erroneous statements based on poor assumptions.
There is a difference between a belief and a claim.
A belief is something you accept as true. (Think most likely, conclude is the case etc)
A claim is something to say IS true.
So, sure, there is a claim that you believe something, but as we don’t have access to anyone’s mental states this isn’t anything we can prove, and really, why would someone say they believe something that they don’t? (Except for outlier cases and cons which again don’t really apply to social media conversations.)
When you do or don’t believe something, the only real duty you have is to yourself, and even then this duty only applies if you care about rationality.
Recap: Your primary duty to any belief position is to yourself.
Rationality deals with the way we reason, using the rules of logic and probability theory. This entails having no strong evidence against your position, no contradiction in your beliefs, not using fallacious reasoning but also realising that bit everything is a fallacy e.g. there are some authorities you can trust without it being a fallay, and this ties into good theories of testimony and all sorts.
So, if we care about rationality, our burden is to justify our position, at least to ourselves, so that we can ensure that we are holding a rational position.
Recap: rationality deals with the way you reason, everyone has a burden to justify their position to themselves if they care about rationality.
You can be wrong (without knowing it) and still be rational, and you can be correct and irrational.
However, rationality is definitely something that would usually lead one to truth if all all information was available to you and analysed mitigating all bias – which is hard to do, as bias is built into our wiring.
So, one’s rationality is somewhat relative to the information available. Someone in an epistemic bubble could be rational for believing something that outside of that bubble would be wildly irrational.
It can be said one can only be as rational as one can be. We should judge a child as a child, they do not have fully developed brains nor learned adequate reasoning skills, and therefore their behaviour is by default less rational on an adult scale.
This too relates to the information available. Forming an option based on 3 bits of information that point to a single conclusion and not being able to find anything else would be rational, even if that conclusion was wrong.
If you later found additional information that then leads elsewhere and the original conclusion was wrong, it would be irrational to maintain that original conclusion as true.
Recap: rationality should be judged in a more relative way, and based on reasoning, not conclusions.
Full Article at: Discussions and The Burden of Proof » Answers In Reason (answers-in-reason.com)
“Religious People are Dumb” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!
Read More ““Religious People are Dumb” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!” »
The post “Religious People are Dumb” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM! appeared first on Answers In Reason.
“Santa vs God” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!
Read More ““Santa vs God” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!” »
The post “Santa vs God” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM! appeared first on Answers In Reason.
The Null Hypothesis: How it Relates to Atheism and God – SciPhi Shortz
Read More “The Null Hypothesis: How it Relates to Atheism and God – SciPhi Shortz” »
The post The Null Hypothesis: How it Relates to Atheism and God – SciPhi Shortz appeared first on Answers In Reason.
“We Are All Born Atheist!” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!
Read More ““We Are All Born Atheist!” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!” »
The post “We Are All Born Atheist!” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM! appeared first on Answers In Reason.
Rationality: How Can a Belief Be Rational? – SciPhi Shortz
Read More “Rationality: How Can a Belief Be Rational? – SciPhi Shortz” »
The post Rationality: How Can a Belief Be Rational? – SciPhi Shortz appeared first on Answers In Reason.
“Atheism is a Conclusion, Not a Belief” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!
Read More ““Atheism is a Conclusion, Not a Belief” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM!” »
The post “Atheism is a Conclusion, Not a Belief” – SciPhi Shortz: BAM! appeared first on Answers In Reason.
Testimony and Miracles – SciPhi
Read More “Testimony and Miracles – SciPhi” »
The post Testimony and Miracles – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.
Mind the Gap! – SciPhi
Read More “Mind the Gap! – SciPhi” »
The post Mind the Gap! – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.
Belief – SciPhi Shortz
Read More “Belief – SciPhi Shortz” »
The post Belief – SciPhi Shortz appeared first on Answers In Reason.
Evidentially Evident Evidence
Evidence is often a hot topic, and one frequently misunderstood. I covered off a number of different types of evidence before in the post Dirty Words: Belief, Faith and Evidence and we have done a small podcast on the matter too BoPping to The Evidence. Even still, sometimes it is better to see if we can approach things...
Read More “Evidentially Evident Evidence” »
The post Evidentially Evident Evidence appeared first on Answers In Reason.The Truth of it All – SciPhi
The Truth is Out There! What is truth? How can we know if something is true? What is a truth-apt statement? Do all statements hold a truth value? How does truth relate to morality? Can we have a subjective truth? In this stream, we hope to cover off these questions and examine a few theories...
Read More “The Truth of it All – SciPhi” »
The post The Truth of it All – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.To Be or Not To Be (Rational)!? – SciPhi
The Rationality Thesis We take a look at the rationality thesis and delve into the rationality debate asking; are humans rational creatures that make performance errors or irrational creatures that sometimes demonstrate rationality? Dave talks about slides in this stream which you can find here: To Be or Not Be Rational – The Video This...
Read More “To Be or Not To Be (Rational)!? – SciPhi” »
The post To Be or Not To Be (Rational)!? – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Are You Sure About That? – SciPhi
Testified! Today we will be looking at testimony, and whether or not it is worth anything. Are our memories to be trusted, or do they contain lots of false information? Can people create fake memories just by using words? How good are people at remembering other’s faces? We will also be coving off a pet...
Read More “Are You Sure About That? – SciPhi” »
The post Are You Sure About That? – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Disgustingly Enjoyable – SciPhi
The Paradox of Negative Emotions Disgust, Fear and Sadness are all negative emotions we usually avoid.Why would rational agents want to seek out things that cause them such distress? We embark on a journey through the paradox of negative emotions to gain a deeper understanding of this very thing. Disgustingly Enjoyable – The Video To...
Read More “Disgustingly Enjoyable – SciPhi” »
The post Disgustingly Enjoyable – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Sweet Emotions – SciPhi
Philosophy of Emotion, how sweet it is! Are emotions just chemical reactions? Or can we consider them more than that? Come join us for a basic introduction to the philosophy of emotion! We are also joined last minute by our friend Bearded Heretic (Luke). We look at emotion both through the lens of Philosophy and...
Read More “Sweet Emotions – SciPhi” »
The post Sweet Emotions – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Reviewing: Criticism of Atheism 3 – SciPhi
Another Video Review? Yes, sorry, another one. Having been incredibly busy we thought we would do another video review. We thought that perhaps Haitham Talaat might have produced a better video than his last. It turned out worse. At least in episode 2 he seemed to be trying to engage in an open dialogue but...
Read More “Reviewing: Criticism of Atheism 3 – SciPhi” »
The post Reviewing: Criticism of Atheism 3 – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Hammering Rationality – SciPhi
Rationality and Hammers? We come back round to rationality, as well as hammers! What do hammers have to do with rationality? Tune in to find out! The conversation will include, but will not be limited to: What is Rationality? How does Rationality relate to Reason? Are there any tools that can help you with rationality?...
Read More “Hammering Rationality – SciPhi” »
The post Hammering Rationality – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Moral Particularism & Value Pluralism
Moral Particularism and Value Pluralism Do particular circumstances affect the moral value of an action? Are there multiple values to assess when looking at moral judgements? Are there any particular standards we should base morality on or is it just what we feel is right at the time? Joi@kriss, @trolleydave and @davidian for tonight’s ethical...
Read More “Moral Particularism & Value Pluralism” »
The post Moral Particularism & Value Pluralism appeared first on Answers In Reason.Objective Morality? Be Real(ist) – SciPhi
Moral Realism Moral Realism states that there are some moral truths that are agent independent. Whilst not all moral judgements are necessarily objective, some are, at least under moral realism. We explore if morality can indeed be objective as well as answering questions and statements about moral relativism, subjectivism, and discussing truth-apt statements. Objective Morality!?...
Read More “Objective Morality? Be Real(ist) – SciPhi” »
The post Objective Morality? Be Real(ist) – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.BoPping to The Evidence – SciPhi
Evidence and The Burden of Proof Evidence and the Burden of Proof are commonly talked about in discussions… Unfortunately, many people misunderstand these things so we hope to clear things up! In this stream, we cover: What is Evidence Claims of “not evidence” What is the Burden of Proof? Other Terms for the Burden of...
Read More “BoPping to The Evidence – SciPhi” »
The post BoPping to The Evidence – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Is Mental Illness Real? – SciPhi
Is Mental Illness Real? We are joined by Bearded Heretic to discuss mental illness. Our conversation will include, but is not limited to: What is mental illness? The medical model of mental health Neurosis vs. Psychosis Everyday behaviour and mental illness Other models of mental illness Is Mental Illnes Real? – The Video This SciPhi...
Read More “Is Mental Illness Real? – SciPhi” »
The post Is Mental Illness Real? – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.The Problem of Dirty Hands – SciPhi
What is ‘The Problem of Dirty Hands’? We discuss the problem of dirty hands, no, not the german porn star. We question if it is possible to do the “right thing” by doing the “wrong thing”? We also question if that makes the “wrong thing” a “moral action”. If you hadn’t guessed ‘Dirty Hands’ is...
Read More “The Problem of Dirty Hands – SciPhi” »
The post The Problem of Dirty Hands – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.God is Dead – SciPhi
‘God is Dead…’ “God is dead, and we have killed him”. Or so Nietzsche’s madman proclaimed. As atheism becomes more popular, Nietzsche’s madman becomes more relevant. We discuss the madman’s words, and how they relate to atheism in the modern-day. Many people misunderstand what Nietzche was trying to say with his ‘God is Dead’ statement,...
Read More “God is Dead – SciPhi” »
The post God is Dead – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.The Problem of Other Minds – SciPhi
What is the Problem of Other Minds? We take a brief introductory look at solipsism and the problem of other minds, covering some of the popular arguments. You can also follow allong using this handy PDF The Problem of Other Minds – The Video This was originally a LIVE YouTube stream, so, if you prefer...
Read More “The Problem of Other Minds – SciPhi” »
The post The Problem of Other Minds – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Philosophy in The Atheist Community – SciPhi
Philosophy in the Atheist Community We experience a number of bad takes on philosophy and philosophical concepts/arguments from our fellow atheists and we thought it would be good to do a stream to discuss these and the reasons why. We will be having a general chat about the disdain many atheists have for Philosophy and...
Read More “Philosophy in The Atheist Community – SciPhi” »
The post Philosophy in The Atheist Community – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.New Atheism and New Atheists w/ Ozymandias Ramses II – SciPhi
We had a discussion of new atheism and new atheists with Ozymandias Ramses II, both from the conception of the term and what it was meant to describe to how it now often used as an insult to a particular group of atheists who demonstrate a number of negative behaviours. This is one of our...
Read More “New Atheism and New Atheists w/ Ozymandias Ramses II – SciPhi” »
The post New Atheism and New Atheists w/ Ozymandias Ramses II – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Free Will – SciPhi
Free Will is often thought of as one of the “Black Hole” Conversations, and I understand why. When discussing free will we see folks really focused on the libertarian/non-causal free will, even within this stream where we start to talk about different types of free will we can see all of us inadvertently shift back....
Read More “Free Will – SciPhi” »
The post Free Will – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.What Are We About? – SciPhi
Hello and welcome to the Fresh Air: SciPhi Show – I am sorry to disappoint you but this isn’t a full show but just a little thing I am putting together to explain what we are about. The SciPhi Show is hosted by Dave (TrolleyDave) and Joe (Davidian) of answers-in-reason.com – an atheist site searching...
Read More “What Are We About? – SciPhi” »
The post What Are We About? – SciPhi appeared first on Answers In Reason.Knowledge and Certainty – Fresh AiR – S03:E02:C02 (AUDIO)
Knowledge and Certainty Tonight’s chapter continues from the last on ‘Propositional Logic and Beliefs‘ but can be taken as its own entity. Like our last chapter this is also available as a VIDEO, but for the listener we have a PDF with all the information provided in said video. So what’s included in tonight’s show?...
Read More “Knowledge and Certainty – Fresh AiR – S03:E02:C02 (AUDIO)” »
The post Knowledge and Certainty – Fresh AiR – S03:E02:C02 (AUDIO) appeared first on Answers In Reason.Propositional Logic and Beliefs – Fresh AiR – S03:E02:C01 (AUDIO)
Propositional Logic and Beliefs Season 3 is all about trying something new. As you might have seen we have been running the SciPhi show on YouTube but in the background we have been planning and producing a bigger and better season 3 for you. Our last episode was on scepticism, and ties in nicely with...
Read More “Propositional Logic and Beliefs – Fresh AiR – S03:E02:C01 (AUDIO)” »
The post Propositional Logic and Beliefs – Fresh AiR – S03:E02:C01 (AUDIO) appeared first on Answers In Reason.Scepticism and Self Reflection – Fresh AiR – S03:E01
Scepticism and Self Reflection Tonight we discuss scepticism and how Cartesian scepticism can be applied introspectively. We speak about meme culture and commonly held opinions that might not stand up to scrutiny, but are often ingrained in to various communities. Further Reading Descartes, Scepticism, and You Denialism and Pseudoscepticism Fresh AiR – S01:E04 – Scepticism...
Read More “Scepticism and Self Reflection – Fresh AiR – S03:E01” »
The post Scepticism and Self Reflection – Fresh AiR – S03:E01 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Season Summary – Fresh AiR – S02:E06
What a great season we have had. We’ve discussed personhood, morality, moral theories, Nietzsche’s critique of morality, free will, a conversation about objective vs subjective morality, ethics in politics, etc. Season 2 Season 1 Personhood Personhood was the characteristics that make us a person, and what that applied to. Aspects of Personhood Life – intrinsic...
Read More “Season Summary – Fresh AiR – S02:E06” »
The post Season Summary – Fresh AiR – S02:E06 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Ideologies – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C07
In our last episode of political ethics, at least for this season, we discuss political ideologies and how we would run political systems within our own country could we go for a total reform.
The post Ideologies – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C07 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Legislation – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C06L
Political Ethics: Legislation Our penultimate episode on political ethics covers legislation, what it means, how we do it and a number of other topics. We also have discussions about weird laws, psychopaths, going psychotic and other random segues What is Legislation? What is law? Constitutions. Amendments. Who can see this? Weird laws! Insanity/Temporary insanity! Psychopathy...
Read More “Legislation – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C06L” »
The post Legislation – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C06L appeared first on Answers In Reason.Freedom – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C05
What is Freedom? Types of Freedom– Political– Personal Is freedom a natural right or a political right? Primary definitions of (political) freedom Freedom From (religion, violence, government interference) Freedom to (be religious, masturbate, get an education) Freedom of (speech, movement, expression, choice) Satrean Freedom is apolitical – “physically free to do whatever” Freedom misconceptions (e.g....
Read More “Freedom – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C05” »
The post Freedom – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C05 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Justice – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C04
What is Justice? (e.g. is it simply fairness?) Cardinal Virtue / First Virtue of Social institutions Kantian Justice – The preservation of human dignity, respecting a person as ends in themselves rather than a means to an end. Rawlsian Justice (aka Distributive Justice) – The fair and equal distribution of goodsThis includes more than just...
Read More “Justice – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C04” »
The post Justice – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C04 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Legitimacy – Fresh AiR -S02:E05:C03
What is Legitimacy In simplest terms this is a justification of validity, but how does that apply to politics? Theories of Legitimacy There is no legitimacy: political Legitimacy implies the right to use violence and the idea that some are worth more than others. This is immoral and untrue and thus itself illegitimate. Legitimacy by...
Read More “Legitimacy – Fresh AiR -S02:E05:C03” »
The post Legitimacy – Fresh AiR -S02:E05:C03 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Obligation – Political Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C02
Obligation – Political Philosophy Chapter 2 We continue our second multi-chapter epiosode with a walk down Obligation. At the start we say we are going to be covering legitimacy and obligation, however we ran out of time, so will be covering off legitimacy next week. So what’s in this weeks episode? The key aspects, but...
Read More “Obligation – Political Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C02” »
The post Obligation – Political Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C02 appeared first on Answers In Reason.An Intro to Political Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C01
What is Political Ethics? We ask the question tonight, ‘What is Political Ethics’ and discuss topics such as: Why is Morality important (to all parties) Legitimacy (covered in a later chapter) Perception of Voters Do all parties act in accordance with their moral compass at all times? We also cover off our what chapters to...
Read More “An Intro to Political Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C01” »
The post An Intro to Political Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E05:C01 appeared first on Answers In Reason.On Morality: Subjective vs Objective – A Discussion – Fresh AiR – S02:E04
Subjective? Objective? Something Else? It is common to hear many reduce morality to it either being subjective or objective, but how accurate is that? Are people defining these terms properly? Are there correct definitions for the context? If one part of morality is subjective, does that make it all subjective? Well, tonight these two atheists,...
Read More “On Morality: Subjective vs Objective – A Discussion – Fresh AiR – S02:E04” »
The post On Morality: Subjective vs Objective – A Discussion – Fresh AiR – S02:E04 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Free Will – Fresh AiR – S02:E03
Free Will Having discussed moral theories at length over the past few weeks we chosen (seemingly) to do a post on free will, and are determined to work out if it truly exists or not, as well as the impact it has on morality. Our Discussion on Free Well includes (but is not limited to):...
Read More “Free Will – Fresh AiR – S02:E03” »
The post Free Will – Fresh AiR – S02:E03 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Nietzsche’s Critique – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C12
Nietzsche’s Critique of Morality To finish our conversations walking through the various moral theories in the last 11 chapters, we felt we should provide Nietzsche’s Critique of Morality, largely from his book ‘On the Genealogy of Morality‘ We Discuss: Morality through power struggle. Whether different types of people need different standards of morality. If suffering...
Read More “Nietzsche’s Critique – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C12” »
The post Nietzsche’s Critique – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C12 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Moral Subjectivism and Relativism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C11
Tonight we embark on our last chapter of specific moral theories and our penultimate chapter of episode 2. Moral Subjectivism and Relativism We discuss a number of topics around subjective and relative morality. What these terms actually mean. What it would mean if morality was wholly subjective or wholly relative. Common misconceptions folks have about...
Read More “Moral Subjectivism and Relativism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C11” »
The post Moral Subjectivism and Relativism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C11 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Virtue Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C10
What is Virtue Ethics? Tonight we discuss virtue ethics, covering topics like: What is a virtue? Which virtue is the most important? How do we apply virtues? If you apply one virtue too much, e.g. bravery, are you still brave, or do you become stupid? And of course we segue into a number of topics...
Read More “Virtue Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C10” »
The post Virtue Ethics – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C10 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Divine Command Theory – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C09
What is Divine Command Theory? This is generally applied to the Abrahamic god speaking of Judeo-Christian morality but could technically be applied to any set of rules or morals that come from a Divine being. One of the key problems with DCT is that for it to be valid we need to prove that deity...
Read More “Divine Command Theory – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C09” »
The post Divine Command Theory – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C09 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Rule Utilitarianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C08
What is Rule Utilitarianism? Rule Utilitarianism is just like Act Utilitarianism but with a twist. It is deontological. That means that following the rules are what is important regardless of the consequences. So why is a typically consequentialist brand, utilitarianism, under the banner of deontology? How does that work? What are the differences? Find Out,...
Read More “Rule Utilitarianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C08” »
The post Rule Utilitarianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C08 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Kantianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C07
What is Kantianism? Kantianism or Kantian Ethics is the moral theory coined by Immanuel Kant. It is our first deontological moral theory, but it is not absolutely deontological as it builds its rules based on absolute consequences. e.g. if everyone stole from everyone, if everyone lied all the time, if everyone killed, if everyone raped...
Read More “Kantianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C07” »
The post Kantianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C07 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Welfarism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C06
What is Welfarism? Welfarism is our next consequentialist moral theory, following on from last week’s Preference Satisfaction Utilitarianism. Welfarism is our last consequentialist moral theory in the series, but how does it differ from the others? What are its strengths and weaknesses? What else do we need to know about it? Find out tonight on...
Read More “Welfarism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C06” »
The post Welfarism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C06 appeared first on Answers In Reason.Preference Satisfaction Utilitarianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C05
Preference Satisfaction Utilitarianism Our next moral theory is Preference Satisfaction Utilitarianism, which is also a consequentialist moral theory. It is similar to Act utilitarianism but holds a few differences as well, and is a much newer theory. What is Preference Satisfaction Utilitarianism? How does it differ to Act Utilitarianism? What are the problems it has?...
Read More “Preference Satisfaction Utilitarianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C05” »
The post Preference Satisfaction Utilitarianism – Fresh AiR – S02:E02:C05 appeared first on Answers In Reason.