"WHICH ANTICHRIST ARE YOU VOTING FOR?" 10-22-2020
This is the pre-debate live stream. Also see http://conspiritainment.com/ about my upcoming book
"Across from me on my computer desk is a coffee mug which reads "don't' talk to me until I've had my adrenochrome." This is an inside joke within an inside joke. If the theories about the elite politicians and celebrities being satanic vampires is true, then this is the kind of in-group humor that would make sense to them. Secret adrenochrome junkies in high places are a staple of conspiritainment.
How can I make light of literal vampirism and cannibalism in high places?
Easy: because there's no evidence for it “yet”. That's always the caveat, that three lettered dangling carrot: "y-e-t". Now to be clear, when I say there's no evidence, I don't mean to imply there isn't a reason to think it's not happening. Quite the contrary, "they" give us every reason to believe this stuff is true. That's what's mind boggling about it. It's like they want us to know something.
Conspiracy theories require a great deal of faith to remain intact. In most cases, believers call themselves "investigators", which is only true so far as their cognitive bias doesn't lead to cherry-picking data to fix the preconceived model. But again, it's alarmingly easy to make the case that this or that Democrat or Hollywood celebrity is a secret-reptoid or alien hybrid.
This is not to say conspiracies don’t exist. It’s important to differentiate between a conspiracy theory, a conspiracy theorist, and a conspiracy fact. Conspiracies do exist. Not all theorists are the same, nor are any explanations closed to further scrutiny. Settled science, settle journalism, and settled historical records do not exist. We have our best guesses, which is what theories are. When the accepted explanations are rejected, theories fill in the vacuum.
The term "conspiracy theorist" is too subjective to be anything other than a pejorative. Serious thinkers are media-analysts, but unlike main-stream media, we go beyond the safe spaces of politically correct discourse.
So to get back to my adrenochrome fix: not taking the theory seriously enough to be terrified by the proposition is healthy. It's healthy to be fearless. There's plenty to fear about hurdling at triple-digit speeds through the sky without a parachute, but most that travel on commercial airlines have separated the theoretical from the factual. Fear is a matter of perspective.
I don't fear what I see on the nightly news. I am intrigued, engaged, angered, amused, and entertained; but I am not frightened. This is the reason the main-stream media hates conspiracy theorists: we're creating our own news narratives without their lies and without the fearporn.
Why should we fear of The End of The World? Should televised phobias keep us up at night? Do you lose sleep over Global Warming or the prospect of alien invasions?
Or are you immensely entertained by the plethora of fictional universes and worldviews collecting into an ever changing consensus of disagreement and contention, as I am?
Lastly, I'm a conspiracy analyst, not a theorist. I don't tolerate ambiguity which is why I ask questions and pry. The Matrix wants us to be apathetic towards inconsistencies, breaks in logic, and contradictions. I refuse the cognitive dissonance and focus on the glitches to glimpse what is real. The truth is out there: beyond the twilight zone, past the x-files and the q-files, beneath the surface, and between the lines of the meta-scripted news cycle. This book will lead you there."