Skip to main content
Liberty Relearned

Liberty Relearned

By JP Mac

To engage in civil, enlightened discussion as to what political direction is best for the U.S. from the conservative, libertarian point of view.


Listen on Spotify
Where to listen
Apple Podcasts Logo

Apple Podcasts

Google Podcasts Logo

Google Podcasts

Overcast Logo

Overcast

Pocket Casts Logo

Pocket Casts

RadioPublic Logo

RadioPublic

Spotify Logo

Spotify

Currently playing episode

Kevin McCarthy is the new Speaker and why that matters.

Liberty Relearned

1x
Dystopic Journal: Has the WEF's Influence Plateaued?
Dystopic Journal: Has the WEF's Influence Plateaued?
One major thing going on in the world this January is the World Economic Forum's annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The WEF's preoccupation continues to be with the climate change and engaging in climate change alarmism. Going through their website, there is a lot of discussion this year about the effects of inflation, inflation that WEF backed policies helped to create. Their conclusion is that people are buying too much stuff and there's not enough of it, totally forgetting to mention the large part that money printing contributes to the problem. Again, they totally ignore their own polices that hamstring the energy and agricultural sectors. Has the power and influence of the WEF reached its zenith? Evidence is starting to suggest that maybe it has. There's even an article published by CNN Business that talks about the waning influence the globalist institution has on national governments. Meanwhile, Dr. Jordan Peterson announces on Joe Rogan's podcast, (mentioned in an article appearing in Just the News,) that he is putting together a consortium of thought leaders on the subject of how to solve the big, global problems without resorting to people losing their liberty or destroying their counties' economies.
29:49
January 31, 2023
The Biden Scandal and the WEF
The Biden Scandal and the WEF
There are currently two different news stories that we need to talk about this week.  The first is the Biden document scandal.  This is at once a Joe Biden and a Hunter Biden scandal.  Classified documents continue to turn up at Biden places of work and home.  Why were they there?  What's in them?  We know at the very least that Hunter had access to them, as they were kept in the same garage that houses a Corvette that we have pictures of Hunter driving.  The Penn Biden Center was funded in part by entities connected to the Chinese Communist Party.  This is something that the Republican controlled House will be interested in finding out.  The FBI was made aware of some of these documents back in the fall of 2022, before the midterm elections.  Why wasn't the public made aware?   The other major thing going on in the world this January is the World Economic Forum's annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The WEF's preoccupation continues to be with the climate change and engaging in climate change alarmism.  Going through their website, there is a lot of discussion this year about the effects of inflation, inflation that WEF backed policies helped to create.  Their conclusion is that people are buying too much stuff and there's not enough of it, totally forgetting to mention the large part that money printing contributes to the problem. Again, they totally ignore their own polices that hamstring the energy and agricultural sectors.  Has the power and influence of the WEF reached its zenith?  Evidence is starting to suggest that maybe it has. There's even an article published by CNN Business that talks about the waning influence the globalist institution has on national governments.  Meanwhile, Dr. Jordan Peterson announces on Joe Rogan's podcast, (mentioned in an article appearing in Just the News,) that he is putting together a consortium of thought leaders on the subject of how to solve the big, global problems without resorting to people losing their liberty or destroying their counties' economies. 
59:47
January 30, 2023
Biden's Document-gate
Biden's Document-gate
Stop me if you've heard this one before...  "A U.S. president has been found to be keeping classified documents at his place of residence..."  No, we're not taking about President Trump, we're talking about President Biden. Journalist, Sharyl Attkisson wrote an article entitled:  Chronology of President Biden's classified document saga in which she gives a timeline of the events surrounding Biden's classified document scandal.  In it she describes what we believe happened and when and draws some contrasts to Trump's document scandal noting:  "Far less significant discoveries have merited SWAT-style raids by the FBI. But here, according to White House accounts, Biden's own lawyers have been permitted to continue searching, even after multiple discoveries." So, why is this coming out now, long after the midterms?  I think we know why. It may be because of the GOP's stated intention to investigate both allegations of Biden family corruption, and the "weaponization" of the U.S. government.  Between those two sets of hearings, this matter would have been uncovered.  The Democrats decided to control how this information got out and wanted to put their own spin it. What will both sides do with this scandal?  Will the GOP pursue impeachment over it?  Will the Democrats let them, or will they use this a leverage to get Biden to step aside to let someone else run for president in 2024?
57:42
January 19, 2023
Biden's Document-gate
Biden's Document-gate
Stop me if you've heard this one before...  "A U.S. president has been found to be keeping classified documents at his place of residence..."  No, we're not taking about President Trump, we're talking about President Biden. Journalist, Sharyl Attkisson wrote an article entitled:  Chronology of President Biden's classified document saga in which she gives a timeline of the events surrounding Biden's classified document scandal.  In it she describes what we believe happened and when and draws some contrasts to Trump's document scandal noting:  "Far less significant discoveries have merited SWAT-style raids by the FBI. But here, according to White House accounts, Biden's own lawyers have been permitted to continue searching, even after multiple discoveries."   So, why is this coming out now, long after the midterms?  I think we know why. It may be because of the GOP's stated intention to investigate both allegations of Biden family corruption, and the "weaponization" of the U.S. government.  Between those two sets of hearings, this matter would have been uncovered.  The Democrats decided to control how this information got out and wanted to put their own spin it.   What will both sides do with this scandal?  Will the GOP pursue impeachment over it?  Will the Democrats let them, or will they use this a leverage to get Biden to step aside to let someone else run for president in 2024?    
57:37
January 16, 2023
Book Review: Neither Stunning nor Brave
Book Review: Neither Stunning nor Brave
The Dystopic Journal starts the year with a new book. It's an entertaining book of dystopic fiction written by comedian Michael Loftus entitled: Neither Stunning nor Brave. It's a look into the not-too-distant future where the Left's cancel culture, ESG scores, and social justice have run roughshod over society and are now making the story's protagonist, Avery's life a living hell. He's on the run from an overpowered, oppressive, totalitarian state. When he meets a group of freedom fighters, he has to readjust to a life where people are free to do as they please, and not be subject to the ever-changing whims of an oppressive society. It's a funny story with a serous underlying message, a cautionary tale about leftism run amok.
17:17
January 11, 2023
Kevin McCarthy is the new Speaker and why that matters.
Kevin McCarthy is the new Speaker and why that matters.
The Dystopic Journal starts the year with a new book.  It's an entertaining book of dystopic fiction written by comedian Michael Loftus entitled:  Neither Stunning nor Brave.  It's a look into the not-too-distant future where the Left's cancel culture, ESG scores, and social justice have run roughshod over society and are now making the story's protagonist, Avery's life a living hell.  He's on the run from an overpowered, oppressive, totalitarian state.  When he meets a group of freedom fighters, he has to readjust to a life where people are free to do as they please, and not be subject to the ever-changing whims of an oppressive society.  It's a funny story with a serous underlying message, a cautionary tale about leftism run amok. After 14 unsuccessful tries, Kevin McCarthy is now the Speaker of the House of Representatives.  He finally made it on the 15th vote after a lot of drama and concessions to his conservative base.  An article in FoxNews.com explains how it happened and what it means going forward.  The conservative wing of the GOP held out such things as more fiscal responsibility. Expect the first half of 2023 to be dominated by Congressional hearings, particularly with regards to Hunter Biden and his dealings with various overseas entities. They'll also want to look at alleged infringements of the first amendment at the hands of various government agencies, especially the DOJ and FBI.  This Congress also wants to end the inflation-causing, multi-trillion dollar spending sprees that have gone on the last few years. Will they use the power the people have given them wisely?  Only time will tell.
59:03
January 09, 2023
Things that won't happen in 2023 (Summary)
Things that won't happen in 2023 (Summary)
The Left giving up on corrupting children 2023 will see the continuation of drag queen story hour, and more confusing children about gender Inflation dropping below 5% Congress just approved $1.7 trillion, much of it going to the political allies of the Democrats, so yeah, continued inflation as the government continues to print more money to bribe the people and pay off special interest groups. Alternative forms of energy coming even close to filling the world’s energy needs Expect this to make the list for years to come. Vladimir Putin winning the Nobel Peace Prize Obama won it, Trump didn’t. The Nobel Prize committee has very little integrity left, but it’s a safe bet that starting a major war won’t get you it. Hunter Biden being charged, much less convicted, of any crime carrying a prison sentence of more than 5 years. The two-tiered justice system will continue. Justin Trudeau renouncing his mentor, Klaus Schwab and his global totalitarian designs Things just aren’t bad enough yet in Canada, so Canadians will remain stuck in an authoritarian system. Google, Facebook, or YouTube coming clean about their discrimination against conservatives and collusion with government agencies to suppress free speech à la Twitter under Musk. Everyone knows that the US Government suborned media companies to limit free speech, but only Twitter has been transparent on the subject. Don’t expect the other social media giants to follow suit in 2023. Plus: What will the Democrats do? Will they replace Biden?
21:51
January 04, 2023
Things that won't happen in 2023
Things that won't happen in 2023
The Left giving up on corrupting children 2023 will see the continuation of drag queen story hour, and more confusing children about gender Inflation dropping below 5% Congress just approved $1.7 trillion, much of it going to the political allies of the Democrats, so yeah, continued inflation as the government continues to print more money to bribe the people and pay off special interest groups. Alternative forms of energy coming even close to filling the world’s energy needs Expect this to make the list for years to come. Vladimir Putin winning the Nobel Peace Prize Obama won it, Trump didn’t. The Nobel Prize committee has very little integrity left, but it’s a safe bet that starting a major war won’t get you it. Hunter Biden being charged, much less convicted, of any crime carrying a prison sentence of more than 5 years. The two-tiered justice system will continue. Justin Trudeau renouncing his mentor, Klaus Schwab and his global totalitarian designs Things just aren’t bad enough yet in Canada, so Canadians will remain stuck in an authoritarian system. Google, Facebook, or YouTube coming clean about their discrimination against conservatives and collusion with government agencies to suppress free speech à la Twitter under Musk. Everyone knows that the US Government suborned media companies to limit free speech, but only Twitter has been transparent on the subject. Don’t expect the other social media giants to follow suit in 2023.
57:35
January 02, 2023
Liberty Relearned Podcast, Christmas Message 2022
Liberty Relearned Podcast, Christmas Message 2022
How we reenact the Nativity each year at Christmastime without even realizing it. “In that region there were shepherds living in the fields, keeping watch over their flock by night. Then an angel of the Lord stood before them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid; for see—I am bringing you good news of great joy for all the people: to you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is the Messiah, the Lord. This will be a sign for you: you will find a child wrapped in bands of cloth and lying in a manger.” And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host, praising God and saying, 'Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace among those whom he favors!” --Luke 2:8-14 On that day, whether it was December 25th, or some other day, God gave us the gift of himself. He gave us our savior, our Messiah. This event was so sacred, so special, that His angels sang for joy about Jesus' birth. He did it, because he favors us, his children. This gift of His only begotten son also gave us a gift-- that of salvation. As children, we make Christmas about getting gifts. We unknowingly, reenact in a way, the anticipation of His people on that first Christmas day of a Messiah who would come to free God's people, His favored. As we get older and mature, we come to know the joy of giving. We come to identify with God's part in this nativity drama, the giving part. Giving gifts then, is how we in our own small way, emulate His part in the story. We continue to love to receive gifts, to be sure, but we also learn the joy of giving. This is not insignificant; for in giving gifts, we make ourselves more like the Father. We create a cycle of joy, of simultaneous giving and receiving. We learn, if we are wise, that we should give of ourselves, give our love to others. We also, like the shepherds in the fields and their people, anticipate His coming, and sing out with joy as the angles did, when we feel his presence among us. So, in life's Nativity play, we at times play the parts of the Shepherds, the Angels, and of our Father. Our tradition of gift-giving, receiving, and rejoicing over the whole thing is the value of the Christmas season. The hope is, that we continue reenacting the Nativity play, perpetuating the cycle of giving, receiving, and rejoicing continuously, in various ways, throughout the year.
06:57
December 26, 2022
Christmas Message, 2022
Christmas Message, 2022
How we reenact the Nativity each year at Christmastime without even realizing it. “In that region there were shepherds living in the fields, keeping watch over their flock by night. Then an angel of the Lord stood before them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid; for see—I am bringing you good news of great joy for all the people: to you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is the Messiah, the Lord. This will be a sign for you: you will find a child wrapped in bands of cloth and lying in a manger.” And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host, praising God and saying, 'Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace among those whom he favors!” --Luke 2:8-14 On that day, whether it was December 25th, or some other day, God gave us the gift of himself. He gave us our savior, our Messiah. This event was so sacred, so special, that His angels sang for joy about Jesus' birth. He did it, because he favors us, his children. This gift of His only begotten son also gave us a gift-- that of salvation. As children, we make Christmas about getting gifts. We unknowingly, reenact in a way, the anticipation of His people on that first Christmas day of a Messiah who would come to free God's people, His favored. As we get older and mature, we come to know the joy of giving. We come to identify with God's part in this nativity drama, the giving part. Giving gifts then, is how we in our own small way, emulate His part in the story. We continue to love to receive gifts, to be sure, but we also learn the joy of giving. This is not insignificant; for in giving gifts, we make ourselves more like the Father. We create a cycle of joy, of simultaneous giving and receiving. We learn, if we are wise, that we should give of ourselves, give our love to others. We also, like the shepherds in the fields and their people, anticipate His coming, and sing out with joy as the angles did, when we feel his presence among us. So, in life's Nativity play, we at times play the parts of the Shepherds, the Angels, and of our Father. Our tradition of gift-giving, receiving, and rejoicing over the whole thing is the value of the Christmas season. The hope is, that we continue reenacting the Nativity play, perpetuating the cycle of giving, receiving, and rejoicing continuously, in various ways, throughout the year.
06:60
December 26, 2022
When Alarmism Crosses into Anti-humanism.
When Alarmism Crosses into Anti-humanism.
A deeply immoral, anti-human, point of view... Climate alarmism is bad enough, but some thought leaders who drive it, who are its philosophical torchbearers, have an even more troubling view of humanity that far exceeds the usual misanthropy you might expect from its proponents. This quote comes from a review of: The End of Nature, by Bill McKibben, published in the Los Angeles Times. Written by David M. Graber in 1989 It reflects a deeply immoral philosophy: "Human happiness, and certainly human fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn’t true. Somewhere along the line--at about a billion years ago, maybe half that--we quit the contract and became a cancer. We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth.” – David M. Graber, Mother Nature as a Hothouse Flower: THE END OF NATURE by Bill McKibben This again, is a deeply immoral outlook on life. Sadly, it is shared by a great many of people. Morality in general terms, can be thought to be comprised of two twin values or “pillars". The first, how much an action serves life. And second, how much an action allows for free-will among humans. Both values are equal and mutually reinforcing. The world view expressed in the quote is an affront to the first pillar of morality, the life pillar. The casual disregard for billions of human lives when he writes: “We are not interested in the utility of a particular species, or free-flowing river, or ecosystem, to mankind. They have intrinsic value, more value--to me--than another human body, or a billion of them,” is shocking. Even the most generous interpretation of this quote, that the billion human lives that have less value than the ecological purity of a piece of geography are notional lives, not yet established, would still be odious. He calls himself a “biocentrist.” He would claim to be deeply invested in the life pillar; except he values no human life if it is advanced past the point of aboriginal. He speaks of valuing wilderness “for its own sake, not for what value it confers upon mankind.” He forgets or is oblivious to the fact that even in appreciating nature for its own sake, suggests a value it confers on mankind. The ability to appreciate something for its own sake, or for any sake, is an ability possessed by mankind alone. (So far as we know). One might put this riddle to him and McKibben: If a tree falls in the woods, and there are no living beings with sentience enough to value it for its own sake, does it have any true value?
36:20
December 20, 2022
The Anti-humanist Left
The Anti-humanist Left
A deeply immoral, anti-human, point of view... Climate alarmism is bad enough, but some thought leaders who drive it, who are its philosophical torchbearers, have an even more troubling view of humanity that far exceeds the usual misanthropy you might expect from its proponents. This quote comes from a review of: The End of Nature, by Bill McKibben, published in the Los Angeles Times. Written by David M. Graber in 1989 It reflects a deeply immoral philosophy: "Human happiness, and certainly human fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that people are part of nature, but it isn’t true. Somewhere along the line--at about a billion years ago, maybe half that--we quit the contract and became a cancer. We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth.” – David M. Graber , Mother Nature as a Hothouse Flower : THE END OF NATURE by Bill McKibben This again, is a deeply immoral outlook on life. Sadly, it is shared by a great many of people. Morality in general terms, can be thought to be comprised of two twin values or “pillars". The first, how much an action serves life. And second, how much an action allows for free-will among humans. Both values are equal and mutually reinforcing. The world view expressed in the quote is an affront to the first pillar of morality, the life pillar. The casual disregard for billions of human lives when he writes: “We are not interested in the utility of a particular species, or free-flowing river, or ecosystem, to mankind. They have intrinsic value, more value--to me--than another human body, or a billion of them,” is shocking. Even the most generous interpretation of this quote, that the billion human lives that have less value than the ecological purity of a piece of geography are notional lives, not yet established, would still be odious. He calls himself a “biocentrist.” He would claim to be deeply invested in the life pillar; except he values no human life if it is advanced past the point of aboriginal. He speaks of valuing wilderness “for its own sake, not for what value it confers upon mankind.” He forgets or is oblivious to the fact that even in appreciating nature for its own sake, suggests a value it confers on mankind. The ability to appreciate something for its own sake, or for any sake, is an ability possessed by mankind alone. (So far as we know). One might put this riddle to him and McKibben: If a tree falls in the woods, and there are no living beings with sentience enough to value it for its own sake, does it have any true value?
59:04
December 19, 2022
Feeding the Totalitarianism with Fear
Feeding the Totalitarianism with Fear
According to Mattias Desmet in his book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, there are four conditions needed for a large-scale mass formation:  1. Generalized loneliness 2.  Lack of meaning of life 3. “Free-floating anxiety and psychological unease.”   4.  A lot of free-floating agresssion.  Leftism as a mass-formation depends on all four of these conditions being met to keep their authoritarianism going. An article about a new NYC mask directive in the Gateway Pundit talks about how New Yorkers are being advised to resume wearing masks again indoors and in crowded situations.  They've even coined the term “tridemic” in order to strike more fear in people.  With people losing their fear over COVID-19, the authoritarian left need something to get those free-floating anxiety levels back up in order to keep their mass-formation going. The “tridemic,” the war in Ukraine, the self-sabotage of our food and energy supplies all have the effect (some might say indented) of increasing the general level of fear and anxiety, something that fuels a totalitarian mass-formation.
58:34
December 12, 2022
The Road to Totalitarianism Pt 2: The Totalitarian Machine Messiah
The Road to Totalitarianism Pt 2: The Totalitarian Machine Messiah
This is a follow-up to the last episode: The Road to Totalitarianism. Here, I emphasize how the Left's totalitarian mass formation is akin to religion, with a distinct dogma, priests, prophets, and the persecution of heretics. Totalitarian systems call on their members to defer reason and judgment in crucial areas to an expert class. Those swept up in the mass formation are convinced to place their faith not in God or religion, but experts and science. Just like with religion, this new machine messiah demands sacrifice and a subordination of will to itself.
22:26
December 09, 2022
Mass Formation and the Deep State
Mass Formation and the Deep State
This episode builds upon the topics discussed in the most recent episode of the Dystopic Journal that speak of the relationship between science and totalitarianism: Even while people take to the streets in China to protest their government's draconian zero-COVID measures, people in the West celebrate and welcome never ending COVID measures restricting personal freedom. In the East the Chinese, conditioned from birth to follow authority, shout for President Xi Jinping's resignation. In the West, Dr Fauci enjoys notoriety as he retires from public life, having led many to give up their fundamental freedoms. In one place, the sway of mass formation has reached its limit. In another, those caught up in a mass formation cling to it. Many of those same people on the left caught up in the mass formation based on COVID-19 fears, are simultaneously caught up in another-- centered around climate-change alarmism. Not just people, but entire countries have subordinated themselves to the gods of climate-change. The twin masters of climate-change and COVID alarmism have hurled countries headlong into self-destructive behavior. National leaders have subjected their citizens to the real possibility of freezing and hunger, largely based on the say of experts and technocrats who've convinced them to self-immolate their nations' farming and energy sectors. Also, in this episode is discussed the Deep State's part a totalitarian mass formation.  The Deep State is real and put its thumb on the scale for one of the candidates in the 2020 presidential election.  (You can probably guess which one.) A recent article in the Post Millennial goes over newly acquired information and how it fits in to what we already know about the suppression of the Biden laptop story.  The Deep States interference in the 2020 election may have swayed the outcome. If so, the lasting consequences of this interference include war in Europe and an economic downturn in the U.S. This is not the way of democracy. 
50:56
December 05, 2022
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Science and Totalitarianism
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Science and Totalitarianism
We further our discussion about The Psychology of Totalitarianism, by Mattias Desmet. It his book, Desmet talks about how in a totalitarian society, religion is replaced by science, and how experts and technocrats become the new priesthood. People caught up in the totalitarian mass formation eagerly subordinate their free will to that of the expert class. On this, he writes: “Totalitarianism is the belief that human intellect can be the guiding principle in life and society. It aims to create a utopian, artificial society lead by technocrats or experts who, based on their technical knowledge, will ensure that the machine of society runs flawlessly. In this view, the individual is completely subordinated to the collective, reduced to being a cog in the machine of society (see, for example, Bertrand Russell in The Impact of Science on Society.) The ideal of a technocratic society was inherent to the Enlightenment tradition, especially in its positivist branch. Positivist thinkers like Henri de Saint-Simon and Auguste Comte expressed their fanatical belief in a humanistic-technocratic society in which scientists and technocrats would take the place of the popes and priests. Not God, but human Reason should be glorified. This is the way to a utopian society without war or conflict, a Realm of Freedom.” Even while people take to the streets in China to protest their governments draconian zero-COVID measures, people in the West celebrate and welcome never ending COVID measures restricting personal freedom. In the East the Chinese, conditioned from birth to follow authority, shout for President Xi Jinping's resignation. In the West, Dr Fauci enjoys notoriety as he retires from public life, having led many to give up their fundamental freedoms. In one place, the sway of mass formation has reached its limit. In another, those caught up in a mass formation cling to it. Many of those same people on the left caught up in the mass formation based on COVID-19 fears, is simultaneously caught up in another-- centered around climate-change alarmism. Not just people, but entire countries have subordinated themselves to the gods of climate-change. The twin masters of climate-change and COVID alarmism have hurled countries headlong into self-destructive behavior. National leaders have subjected their citizens to the real possibility of freezing and hunger, largely based on the say of experts and technocrats who've convinced them to self-immolate their nations' farming and energy sectors. Totalitarian systems call on their members to defer reason and judgment in crucial areas to an expert class. Those swept up in the mass formation are convinced to place their faith not in God or religion, but experts and science. Just like with religion, this new machine messiah demands sacrifice and a subordination of will to itself.
13:27
December 01, 2022
The Road to Totalitarianism
The Road to Totalitarianism
Currently in China, people have take to the streets to protests their government's draconian anti-COVID measures.  According to an articlein Just the News, people throughout China are protesting the authoritarian measures and calling for their leader, Xi Jinping to step down.  Even a people programmed to follow authority since birth have reached their limits and have begun to speak out. Meanwhile in the West, many people are perfectly ready to be told to make back up again this winter, and to be double, triple, and quadruple vaccinated.  Dr. Fauci, in his last official public appearance, has continued to call for masks and unceasing vaccinations. Mass formations depend upon fear to exist.  As long as people can be made to fear something, a totalitarian system can be established and maintained.
52:13
November 28, 2022
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Perpetuating the Totalitarianism
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Perpetuating the Totalitarianism
How does mass formation perpetuate totalitarian regimes? “In substance, the totalitarian leader is nothing more nor less than the functionary of the masses he leads; he is not a power-hungry individual imposing a tyrannical and arbitrary will upon his subjects. Being a mere functionary, he can be replaced at any time, and he depends just as much on the masses he embodies as the masses depend upon him.” -Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism “Given this background, one could infer, if one did not know it already, the general structure of Oceanic society. At the apex of the pyramid comes Big Brother. Big Brother is infallible and all-powerful. Every success, every achievement, every victory, every scientific discovery, all knowledge, all wisdom, all happiness, all virtue, are held to issue directly from his leadership and inspiration. Nobody has ever seen Big Brother. He is a face on the hoardings, a voice on the telescreen. We may be reasonably sure that he will never die, and there is already considerable uncertainty as to when he was born. Big Brother is the guise in which the Party chooses to exhibit itself to the world. His function is to act as a focusing point for love, fear, and reverence, emotions which are more easily felt toward and individual than toward an organization.” -George Orwell, 1984 Unlike a dictatorship, the head of a totalitarian regime is an ideology.  That makes it very hard to end the regime by simply toppling its titular leader. 
31:15
November 22, 2022
The Global Redistribution of Wealth
The Global Redistribution of Wealth
The UN has come up with a scheme by which wealthy countries pay less wealthy countries “reparations” for natural disasters attributed to climate change. This episode goes over an article in  FoxNews.com that describes the scheme and points out some of the less-fair parts of it.  Is the UN scheme a fund for natural disasters, or simply a means to redistribute wealth on a global scale?
56:35
November 21, 2022
Post-Midterm Special
Post-Midterm Special
So, what happened with the election? The Democrats will retain control of the Senate, Republicans will probably control the House. According to an NBC News exit poll, most of the people who voted weren't fans of President Biden, but the election seems to have been only indirectly a referendum on his performance.  Most of the people polled were voting primarily on Inflation (31%) or Abortion (27%).  Crime, the next most important issue for Republicans seems not to have been important enough in blue districts to make a difference. The US Senate race between Fetterman and Dr Oz is a good example of why the Democrats have been fighting for extended early voting.  They wanted as many people voting before the debate between Oz and Fetterman.  Fetterman, who suffered a stroke earlier in the year was in no shape for a debate.  Would the people who voted for Fetterman before the debate have voted for him after?  We'll never know, but it's likely that at least some who did wouldn't have.   As far as elections go, Arizona has become the new Florida. Florida had become the laughingstock when it came to running elections during the Bush v Gore fiasco in 2000/2001.  Now Florida has cleaned up its act and is now a model of how elections should be run in the US. For the second major election in a row, Arizona has failed to finish counting ballots and declaring winners, long after almost every other state has finished counting theirs sufficiently to declare winners and losers. If a party were going to cheat, (not saying anybody did yet) they'd certainly have an easier time of it in Arizona.  If a party or candidate were going to pull any shenanigans, legal or illegal, they'd have ample time and opportunity to do it in Arizona. --We'll just leave it that! 
59:44
November 16, 2022
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Radical Intolerance
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Radical Intolerance
EP 14: Radical Intolerance We continue covering the phenomenon of mass formation described by Mattias Desmet, and how the mass formation creates radical intolerance against anybody not caught up in the mass formation. Why did we have to deal with “mask Karens” telling us to wear a mask during COVID, and why were people skeptical about the COVID vaccine dubbed “anti-vaxxers”? Why are people skeptical of the climate-change alarmism called “climate-deniers”. How did this phenomenon play out in the past century with the fascists and communists? From The Psychology of Totalitarianism by Mattias Desmet: “We have to add one more important characteristic to the problematic psychological properties of mass formation: radical intolerance of other opinions and strong tendency toward authoritarianism. To the masses, dissident voices appear 1) antisocial and devoid of solidarity, because they refuse to participate in the solidarity that the mass formation creates; 2) completely unfounded as critical arguments are no assigned any cognitive or emotional weight within the narrow circle of attention of the masses; 3) extremely aversive because they threaten to break the intoxication and in this way confront the masses again with the negative situation that preceded the mass formation (lack of social bond and meaning, indefinable fear and unease); 4) extremely frustrating because they threaten to remove the venting of latent aggression.” This goes a long way towards explaining the kind of vitriol and condescension so prevalent on the left nowadays towards anybody who refuses to go along with them. This explains the steep rise of authoritarianism, especially in the West around COVID and climate-change.
25:37
November 15, 2022
Post Midterm Election Special
Post Midterm Election Special
So, what happened with the election? The Democrats will retain control of the Senate, Republicans will probably control the House. According to an NBC News exit poll, most of the people who voted weren't fans of President Biden, but the election seems to have been only indirectly a referendum on his performance.  Most of the people polled were voting primarily on Inflation (31%) or Abortion (27%).  Crime, the next most important issue for Republicans seems not to have been important enough in blue districts to make a difference. The US Senate race between Fetterman and Dr Oz is a good example of why the Democrats have been fighting for extended early voting.  They wanted as many people voting before the debate between Oz and Fetterman.  Fetterman, who suffered a stroke earlier in the year was in no shape for a debate.  Would the people who voted for Fetterman before the debate have voted for him after?  We'll never know, but it's likely that at least some who did wouldn't have.   As far as elections go, Arizona has become the new Florida. Florida had become the laughingstock when it came to running elections during the Bush v Gore fiasco in 2000/2001.  Now Florida has cleaned up its act and is now a model of how elections should be run in the US. For the second major election in a row, Arizona has failed to finish counting ballots and declaring winners, long after almost every other state has finished counting theirs sufficiently to declare winners and losers. If a party were going to cheat, (not saying anybody did yet) they'd certainly have an easier time of it in Arizona.  If a party or candidate were going to pull any shenanigans, legal or illegal, they'd have ample time and opportunity to do it in Arizona. --We'll just leave it that! 
59:41
November 14, 2022
Election Special: What do the Left and Right want?
Election Special: What do the Left and Right want?
What is the end goal of the leftist Democrats? What would they do with the power they seek? Utopianism The left believes that men should be ruled by experts. All matters of health and welfare should be determined by unelected officials. This was most clearly seen during the recent COVID pandemic. Elected officials yielded power to unelected officials to determine how we should live. Utopianism, carried to its logical extreme is totalitarian in nature. The only choices in life would be those per-approved by the state. Someone, a member of an elite class, will determine what is good for society, the state, and you. Democracy won’t mean the people will get to determine how they will be ruled, only which of a few pre-selected candidates will be serve in various capacities. There are no natural “rights” in a utopian society. The totalitarian society will run on a series of privileges doled out for correct behavior, and punishments for bad behavior. Things like ESG already control the behavior of individuals indirectly. The aim of the Utopian Left is to extend this sort of control to the individual level. Examples of this can already be seen in such things like vaccine passports and mask mandates. The reliance on technology will be used as a point of control. Access to things like education, online commerce, and entertainment will be subject to an ever-increasing array of rules and regulations. In order to partake in the modern lifestyle, people will be made to trade their freedom and privacy for goods and services. Heath, spending, energy consumption and location will all be monitored through technology sold as convenience. Direct control over individual commerce though digital currency is part of the Left’s ultimate control plan. Anyone living in today’s world scarcely need and example, as the means to exercise such control already exists, only the organized implantation, directed and executed by the ruling elite remains. What about the Right? Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Rule of Law. The Republicans want smaller government.  They want a government to do a few essential things well.    The first mission of a Republican Congress will be to stop the unchecked growth of government, and to get federal spending under control. Reducing government spending is the key to reducing inflation. Where Democrats wish to treat the symptoms of inflation by handing out more money, the Republicans want to attack inflation at its source, by reducing deficit spending. No, America will not become fascist under their control.  Yes, we'll still be having elections two years from now when we select a new president. A Republican Congress alone won't be enough to reverse the damage of the last two years, but they can stop it from getting worse.  
49:10
November 10, 2022
Election Special 2022
Election Special 2022
What is the end goal of the leftist Democrats?  What would they do with the power they seek? Utopianism   The left believes that men should be ruled by experts.  All matters of health and welfare should be determined by unelected officials.   This was most clearly seen during the recent COVID pandemic. Elected officials yielded power to unelected officials to determine how we should live.  Utopianism, carried to its logical extreme is totalitarian in nature. The only choices in life would be those per-approved by the state.  Someone, a member of an elite class, will determine what is good for society, the state, and you.  Democracy won't mean the people will get to determine how they will be ruled, only which of a few pre-selected candidates will be serve in various capacities.  There are no natural “rights” in a utopian society.  The totalitarian society will run on a series of privileges doled out for correct behavior, and punishments for bad behavior. Control  A totalitarian system must have mechanisms to control the people living within them.  Many of these controls already exist in crude, but constantly refined and augmented forms.  The CCP in China has a social credit score system.  Privileges, such as where you can live, work, and go to school are given according to behavior favored by the Party. Undesirable privileges can be revokes as well for behavior deemed non-beneficial to the Party. In the West, the system of Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) has been developed to control the actions of corporations and governments. A corporation's ability to access critical services like banking and access to capital under ESG is determined by their ESG score. Things like ESG already control individual the behavior of individuals indirectly. The aim of the Utopian Left is to extend this sort of control to the individual level. Examples of this can already be seen in such things like vaccine passports and mask mandates.  The reliance on technology will be used as a point of control.  Access to things like education, online commerce, and entertainment will be subject to an ever-increasing array of rules and regulations.  In order to partake in the modern lifestyle, people will be made to trade their freedom and privacy for goods and services.  Heath, spending, energy consumption and location will all be monitored through technology sold as convenience.   Direct control over individual commerce though digital currency is part of the Left's ultimate control plan.  Anyone living in today's world scarcely need and example, as the means to exercise such control already exists, only the organized implantation, directed and executed by the ruling elite remains.
59:14
November 07, 2022
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Halloween Special
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Halloween Special
What scares the Left?  Commentary on the top five things that the Left fears:  Power is the ultimate pursuit of the left.  Follow the Left's ideology to its logical conclusion and you have a totalitarian state not unlike the one imagined by Orwell in his novel, 1984. It stands to reason then, that their greatest fear is not being in control-- of everyone and everything.  The Left is highly motivated by fear, and they fear a world in which they are not in control they will be victimized by those who are.  This is driven by the Marxist belief that all power imbalances between people result in an oppressor/oppressed relationship. For the Left to realize their totalitarian dreams, they know they cannot have any competing ideologies.  Objective morality, like objective reality acts as a sociological insulation against the kinds of amoral and even immoral behaviors that are necessary for totalitarianism to gain and maintain control of the populace. Just like the pigs in Orwell's Animal Farm needed to change the laws of the farm to suit their needs and to give the appearance that they were not above the law, so too does the Left need an ever-changing sense of morality that suits the needs of the elite among them. Independent thinkers question the intentions of others, and have a stubborn reliance on facts when it comes to making important decisions for themselves and their loved ones.  The leftist elite cannot have anyone questioning their decisions, much less refusing to go along with them.  To paraphrase the fascists-- Nothing outside the collective, everything inside the collective, and nothing against the collective. All wants and needs must align with those of the collective. We see this taken to its logical extreme in Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged, when society completely collapses without the services of those who refuse to sacrifice their own self-interest to an ungrateful society that takes them for granted. Five Things the Left Fears Most: Losing Power. A Trump presidency. Having to defend their ideas. Organized religion, especially Christianity and Judaism. Individually held rights and beliefs.
53:41
October 31, 2022
Liberty Relearned Podcast:  Halloween Special
Liberty Relearned Podcast: Halloween Special
For Halloween:  What does the Left fear the most?  Here are the top five things... Losing Power.  Power is the ultimate pursuit of the left.  Follow the Left's ideology to its logical conclusion and you have a totalitarian state not unlike the one imagined by Orwell in his novel, 1984. It stands to reason then, that their greatest fear is not being in control-- of everyone and everything.  The Left is highly motivated by fear, and they fear a world in which they are not in control they will be victimized by those who are.  This is driven by the Marxist belief that all power imbalances between people result in an oppressor/oppressed relationship. A Trump presidency.  The Democrats have dedicated themselves since he was elected in 2016 to remove Donald Trump from power. Two failed impeachment attempts, zealous prosecutions and scores of nuisance lawsuits against Trump show just what an existential threat the Left believes he poses to their plans.  Even after two years out of office, Trump lives rent-free in the heads of Democrats. President Biden even dedicated a speech almost entirely to labeling “MAGA Republicans” as threats to democracy. Having to defend their ideas.  Their long war against free speech reached its zenith with the temporary deplatforming of Parler, a challenge to Twitter's dominance in the social media market.  The social media giants of Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have dedicated themselves to eliminating or squelching competing points of view. Time and again, conservative speakers have been the target of protests, sometimes violent, boycotts, and censorship.  The Left prefers cancellation to debate.  Whenever you hear the terms like disinformation or misinformation being used in the mainstream media, or a story gets “fact-checked,” that's usually a sign that the article or statement in question runs afoul of their established, approved narrative. This is a sign that the Left realizes the fragility of one of their narratives. Organized religion, especially Christianity and Judaism.  For the Left to realize their totalitarian dreams, they know they cannot have any competing ideologies.  Objective morality, like objective reality acts as a sociological insulation against the kinds of amoral and even immoral behaviors that are necessary for totalitarianism to gain and maintain control of the populace. Just like the pigs in Orwell's Animal Farm needed to change the laws of the farm to suit their needs and to give the appearance that they were not above the law, so too does the Left need an ever-changing sense of morality that suits the needs of the elite among them. Ultimately, just as with the totalitarian systems of the 20th Century, the Left need you to be obedient not first to God, or a set of laws such as the Constitution, but to them. Individually held rights and beliefs.  Collectivism is the core ideology of the Left.  Communism, socialism, and fascism are all variations of collectivism.  The individual must surrender themselves to the collective.  “For the greater good” has been the rationale behind every tyrannical law and dictate.  Independent thinkers question the intentions of others and have a stubborn reliance on facts when it comes to making important decisions for themselves and their loved ones.  The leftist elite cannot have anyone questioning their decisions, much less refusing to go along with them.  To paraphrase the fascists-- Nothing outside the collective, everything inside the collective, and nothing against the collective. All wants and needs must align with those of the collective.
09:06
October 31, 2022
Halloween Special:  The 5 things the Left fear the most
Halloween Special: The 5 things the Left fear the most
Losing Power.  Power is the ultimate pursuit of the left.  Follow the Left's ideology to its logical conclusion and you have a totalitarian state not unlike the one imagined by Orwell in his novel, 1984. It stands to reason then, that their greatest fear is not being in control-- of everyone and everything.  The Left is highly motivated by fear, and they fear a world in which they are not in control they will be victimized by those who are.  This is driven by the Marxist belief that all power imbalances between people result in an oppressor/oppressed relationship. A Trump presidency.  The Democrats have dedicated themselves since he was elected in 2016 to remove Donald Trump from power. Two failed impeachment attempts, zealous prosecutions and scores of nuisance lawsuits against Trump show just what an existential threat the Left believes he poses to their plans.  Even after two years out of office, Trump lives rent-free in the heads of Democrats. President Biden even dedicated a speech almost entirely to labeling “MAGA Republicans” as threats to democracy. Having to defend their ideas.  Their long war against free speech reached its zenith with the temporary deplatforming of Parler, a challenge to Twitter's dominance in the social media market.  The social media giants of Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have dedicated themselves to eliminating or squelching competing points of view. Time and again, conservative speakers have been the target of protests, sometimes violent, boycotts, and censorship.  The Left prefers cancellation to debate.  Whenever you hear the terms like disinformation or misinformation being used in the mainstream media, or a story gets “fact-checked,” that's usually a sign that the article or statement in question runs afoul of their established, approved narrative. This is a sign that the Left realizes the fragility of one of their narratives. Organized religion, especially Christianity and Judaism.  For the Left to realize their totalitarian dreams, they know they cannot have any competing ideologies.  Objective morality, like objective reality acts as a sociological insulation against the kinds of amoral and even immoral behaviors that are necessary for totalitarianism to gain and maintain control of the populace. Just like the pigs in Orwell's Animal Farm needed to change the laws of the farm to suit their needs and to give the appearance that they were not above the law, so too does the Left need an ever-changing sense of morality that suits the needs of the elite among them. Ultimately, just as with the totalitarian systems of the 20th Century, the Left need you to be obedient not first to God, or a set of laws such as the Constitution, but to them. Individually held rights and beliefs.  Collectivism is the core ideology of the Left.  Communism, socialism, and fascism are all variations of collectivism.  The individual must surrender themselves to the collective.  “For the greater good” has been the rationale behind every tyrannical law and dictate.  Independent thinkers question the intentions of others, and have a stubborn reliance on facts when it comes to making important decisions for themselves and their loved ones.  The leftist elite cannot have anyone questioning their decisions, much less refusing to go along with them.  To paraphrase the fascists-- Nothing outside the collective, everything inside the collective, and nothing against the collective. All wants and needs must align with those of the collective.
59:41
October 31, 2022
They want our pets now
They want our pets now
From Ep 25: What is the matter with these people? Our pets are now a target of the Left's eco-fascism.  What kind of demented, dystopic world do these people live in?  An article in the Blaze gives the response of some same people to the idea that pets are part of the climate change problem, as an article in CNN states. This attack on our pets is part of a larger strategy.  In the West, pets are considered part of the family.  Marxism and its collectivist derivatives have targeted the West and the family for destruction.   Families and Western thought, born of the Judeo-Christian tradition, stand in the way of the Left's totalitarian designs. For people who love their pets, even liberals who don't own a gun, don't have kids, don't own a car, or don't understand money, their pets might be where they finally draw the line.  The love of pets is one of the last commonalities between the Left and the Right in this world.  You can mess with someone's gun, their car or their money, but don't mess with their pets.  CNN may be barking up the wrong tree when it comes to downsizing Fido or Kitty. What kind of person is so caught up in the climate-change alarmism that they'd suggest pets are part of the problem?  Perhaps someone caught up in mass-formation psychosis.  More on that subject later... (Stay tuned.) Until next time, Stay healthy, happy, and free!
01:00:04
October 24, 2022
Now they want our pets.
Now they want our pets.
What is the matter with these people? Our pets are now a target of the Left's eco-fascism.  What kind of demented, dystopic world do these people live in?  An article in the Blaze gives the response of some same people to the idea that pets are part of the climate change problem, as an article in CNN states. This attack on our pets is part of a larger strategy.  In the West, pets are considered part of the family.  Marxism and its collectivist derivatives have targeted the West and the family for destruction.   Families and Western thought, born of the Judeo-Christian tradition, stand in the way of the Left's totalitarian designs. For people who love their pets, even liberals who don't own a gun, don't have kids, don't own a car, or don't understand money, their pets might be where they finally draw the line.  The love of pets is one of the last commonalities between the Left and the Right in this world.  You can mess with someone's gun, their car or their money, but don't mess with their pets.  CNN may be barking up the wrong tree when it comes to downsizing Fido or Kitty. What kind of person is so caught up in the climate-change alarmism that they'd suggest pets are part of the problem?  Perhaps someone caught up in mass-formation psychosis.  More on that subject later... (Stay tuned.) Until next time, Stay healthy, happy, and free!
59:47
October 24, 2022
Three anti-Trump Fallacies
Three anti-Trump Fallacies
From Ep24:  There are at least three false beliefs that virulent anti-Trumpers hold in common. Though none of the claims stand up to close scrutiny, and several are demonstrably false, no amount of debunking, no direct proof, no evidence will dissuade those suffering from TDS, (Trump Derangement Syndrome) from their insistence that Trump is Hitler reborn and all who follow him are Nazis. First, is the hoax perpetrated by Hillary, her campaign and the FBI that Vladimir Putin had dirt on Trump, and that he and many of his inner circle were puppets of the Kremlin. Second, is the misconception that Trump said that the white supremacists at Charlottesville, SC were “fine people.” Third is the belief that the riot at the Capitol on January 6th, 2021, was an insurrection planned and orchestrated by Donald Trump himself. These claims persist long after they've been debunked. The feeling of moral superiority by those who continue to hold onto these falsehoods must be so high, that no amount of factual data, or evidence to the contrary, can shake them loose from those who cling to them. These fallacies are a problem, not just because they involve deception, but they also induce bigotry and sometimes even violence against “MAGA Republicans” and others who espouse conservative values. Much has been said and written in an effort to debunk the persistent myths, fallacies, and libels against former President Trump. Many who continue to cling to such false beliefs have closed themselves off to any counter arguments, or proof that might challenge them. Why then re-address the falsehoods here? Because they persist, and they are dangerous. They are dangerous in the immediate sense that people have been attacked and even killed for supporting Trump and conservative causes such as right to life that are closely associated with either Trump or Republicans. After the President concluded his speech at the Republican Convention in 2020, attendees were harassed and assaulted upon leaving the venue. Members of his cabinet have suffered similar harassment. President Biden gave a speech in Philadelphia almost entirely devoted to accusing “MAGA Republicans” of being enemies of democracy. Not long after, a North Dakota teen was murdered, run down by a man who thought the kid was part of a Republican extremist group. According to the Associated Press: “The driver, Shannon Brandt, told a 911 dispatcher that he struck Cayler Ellingson early Sunday in McHenry because the teenager was threatening him, and that the teen was part of a 'Republican extremist group,' according to a probable cause affidavit.” Did Brandt think he was defending democracy? A more long-term hazard is that people, having been fed a steady diet of anti-Trump rhetoric, have been whipped up into such a Trump-hating frenzy, that they will ignore the more glaring assaults on America's freedom. America stands at a crossroads. It would not be overselling it to say that the constitutional republic that the Founding Fathers meant America to be is at risk. The Biden regime is pursuing its political and ideological opponents with a zeal seldom seen in this country. The Democrats seem to be bent on the same sort of eco-fascist policies that have destroyed other countries or taken their freedom. Other countries in the Anglosphere, namely Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have shown an alarming propensity to go authoritarian to the point that they barely qualify as free countries anymore. Even if the Republicans take back Congress, that can stop further damage, but not reverse it. An electorate suffering from TDS, blind to their own prejudices is liable to vote away our freedom just to spite one man they have convinced themselves is an enemy of democracy and vote in the exact sort of fascism they claim to be against.
58:39
October 17, 2022
The three worst anti-Trump fallacies
The three worst anti-Trump fallacies
There are at least three false beliefs that virulent anti-Trumpers hold in common. Though none of the claims stand up to close scrutiny, and several are demonstrably false, no amount of debunking, no direct proof, no evidence will dissuade those suffering from TDS, (Trump Derangement Syndrome) from their insistence that Trump is Hitler reborn and all who follow him are Nazis. First, is the hoax perpetrated by Hillary, her campaign and the FBI that Vladimir Putin had dirt on Trump, and that he and many of his inner circle were puppets of the Kremlin. Second, is the misconception that Trump said that the white supremacists at Charlottesville, SC were “fine people.” Third is the belief that the riot at the Capitol on January 6th, 2021, was an insurrection planned and orchestrated by Donald Trump himself. These claims persist long after they've been debunked. The feeling of moral superiority by those who continue to hold onto these falsehoods must be so high, that no amount of factual data, or evidence to the contrary, can shake them loose from those who cling to them. These fallacies are a problem, not just because they involve deception, but they also induce bigotry and sometimes even violence against “MAGA Republicans” and others who espouse conservative values. Much has been said and written in an effort to debunk the persistent myths, fallacies, and libels against former President Trump. Many who continue to cling to such false beliefs have closed themselves off to any counter arguments, or proof that might challenge them. Why then re-address the falsehoods here? Because they persist, and they are dangerous. They are dangerous in the immediate sense that people have been attacked and even killed for supporting Trump and conservative causes such as right to life that are closely associated with either Trump or Republicans. After the President concluded his speech at the Republican Convention in 2020, attendees were harassed and assaulted upon leaving the venue. Members of his cabinet have suffered similar harassment. President Biden gave a speech in Philadelphia almost entirely devoted to accusing “MAGA Republicans” of being enemies of democracy. Not long after, a North Dakota teen was murdered, run down by a man who thought the kid was part of a Republican extremist group. According to the Associated Press: “The driver, Shannon Brandt, told a 911 dispatcher that he struck Cayler Ellingson early Sunday in McHenry because the teenager was threatening him, and that the teen was part of a 'Republican extremist group,' according to a probable cause affidavit.” Did Brandt think he was defending democracy? A more long-term hazard is that people, having been fed a steady diet of anti-Trump rhetoric, have been whipped up into such a Trump-hating frenzy, that they will ignore the more glaring assaults on America's freedom. America stands at a crossroads. It would not be overselling it to say that the constitutional republic that the Founding Fathers meant America to be is at risk. The Biden regime is pursuing its political and ideological opponents with a zeal seldom seen in this country. The Democrats seem to be bent on the same sort of eco-fascist policies that have destroyed other countries or taken their freedom. Other countries in the Anglosphere, namely Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have shown an alarming propensity to go authoritarian to the point that they barely qualify as free countries anymore. Even if the Republicans take back Congress, that can stop further damage, but not reverse it. An electorate suffering from TDS, blind to their own prejudices is liable to vote away our freedom just to spite one man they have convinced themselves is an enemy of democracy and vote in the exact sort of fascism they claim to be against.
58:51
October 17, 2022
Equal Treatment
Equal Treatment
Equal Treatment Under the Law From 10/9/22 episode:  Are pro-lifers being singled out for prosecution?  Eleven pro-life activists have been arrested for allegedly preventing people from entering an abortion clinic. Another pro-life activist, Paul Vaughn* was arrested by the FBI for violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act).  He reportedly pushed a pro-abortion activist in response that person menacing his kid at an otherwise peaceful protest.  meanwhile, no arrests are known to have been made in connection with a series of attacks on Pro-life pregnancy centers, churches, and other concerns by pro-abortion terrorists. According to an article by Mary Margaret Olohan in the Daily Signal, these charges against pro-lifers are part of a disturbing pattern of unequal treatment of pro-lifers vs. pro-choice activists. According to the article: “At least 83 Catholic churches and 73 pregnancy resource centers or pro-life organizations have been attacked since the draft opinion was leaked in May. Some of these pro-life centers and organizations told The Daily Signal that they have not heard anything from federal authorities—though the FBI said it is investigating 'a series of attacks and threats targeting pregnancy resource centers, faith-based organizations, and reproductive health clinics across the country, as well as to judicial buildings, including the U.S. Supreme Court.” These events represent a greater pattern of the DOJ seeming to pursue people alleged to have committed crimes on the right with much more vigor and intensity than they do people on the left. Hillary Clinton was accused of having classified documents in an unclassified environment and was not charged. President Trump was accused of the basically the same thing, and the left is screaming for him to be charged. Substantial evidence exists suggesting Hunter Biden has committed numerous felonies, and as yet has not been charged. (Charges may be pending).  In some cases, President Biden has been tied his son's alleged illegal activities and those of his various businesses.  President was impeached twice on spurious charges, President Biden has yet to be impeached, much less charged with arguably more serious crimes of influence peddling and opening the office up to blackmail by foreign entities.  Everyone is entitled to equal justice under the law.    Evidence so far suggests that the Democrats and their allies in the deep state pursue conservatives accused of crimes with much more vigor than they do left-wingers. *Editor's Note:  The Signal article quoted has the father charged with a FACE violation as Mark Houck, another article seemingly describing the same incident gives the name as Paul Vaughn. Until next time, Stay healthy, happy, and free!
53:06
October 10, 2022
Equal Treatment Under the Law
Equal Treatment Under the Law
Equal Treatment Under the Law Are pro-lifers being singled out for prosecution?  Eleven pro-life activists have been arrested for allegedly preventing people from entering an abortion clinic.   Another pro-life activist, Paul Vaughn* was arrested by the FBI for violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act).  He reportedly pushed a pro-abortion activist in response that person menacing his kid at an otherwise peaceful protest.  meanwhile, no arrests are known to have been made in connection with a series of attacks on Pro-life pregnancy centers, churches, and other concerns by pro-abortion terrorists. According to an article by Mary Margaret Olohan in the Daily Signal, these charges against pro-lifers are part of a disturbing pattern of unequal treatment of pro-lifers vs. pro-choice activists. According to the article: “At least 83 Catholic churches and 73 pregnancy resource centers or pro-life organizations have been attacked since the draft opinion was leaked in May. Some of these pro-life centers and organizations told The Daily Signal that they have not heard anything from federal authorities—though the FBI said it is investigating 'a series of attacks and threats targeting pregnancy resource centers, faith-based organizations, and reproductive health clinics across the country, as well as to judicial buildings, including the U.S. Supreme Court.” These events represent a greater pattern of the DOJ seeming to pursue people alleged to have committed crimes on the right with much more vigor and intensity than they do people on the left. Hillary Clinton was accused of having classified documents in an unclassified environment and was not charged. President Trump was accused of the basically the same thing, and the left is screaming for him to be charged. Substantial evidence exists suggesting Hunter Biden has committed numerous felonies, and as yet has not been charged. (Charges may be pending).  In some cases, President Biden has been tied his son's alleged illegal activities and those of his various businesses.  President was impeached twice on spurious charges, President Biden has yet to be impeached, much less charged with arguably more serious crimes of influence peddling and opening the office up to blackmail by foreign entities.  Everyone is entitled to equal justice under the law.    Evidence so far suggests that the Democrats and their allies in the deep state pursue conservatives accused of crimes with much more vigor than they do left-wingers. *Editor's Note:  The Signal article quoted has the father charged with a FACE violation as Mark Houck, another article seemingly describing the same incident gives the name as Paul Vaughn. Until next time, Stay healthy, happy, and free!
59:14
October 10, 2022
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Geopolitics: Orwell vs. Today's World
JP'S Dystopic Journal: Geopolitics: Orwell vs. Today's World
Orwell got a lot of things right, like the surveillance state and doublethink. How close was his vision of the geopolitical landscape in 1984 to real life? "The splitting-up of the world into three great superstates was an event which could be and indeed was foreseen before the middle of the twentieth century. With the absorption of Europe by Russia and the British Empire by the United States, two of the three existing powers, Eurasia and Oceania, were already effectively in being. The third, Eastasia, only emerged as a distinct unit after another decade of confused fighting. The frontiers between the three superstates are in some places arbitrary, and in others they fluctuate according to the fortunes of war, but in general they follow geographical lines." -- George Orwell, 1984 Orwell predicted a world with three superstates in a continual state of conflict.  Is that not pretty much what we have now? 
33:17
October 04, 2022
Liberty Relearned Podcast: The Left desperately want you to believe Meloni is a fascist.
Liberty Relearned Podcast: The Left desperately want you to believe Meloni is a fascist.
The Left and the mainstream media are desperate for you to believe that Italian Prime Minister-elect Giorgia Meloni is a fascist.  She personifies a growing group of populists who reject woke ideology and globalism.  An article in the Christian Post by Ryan Foley explains both what is being said about her, and what Ms. Meloni says about herself and her party.  Here a couple of excerpts that explain why the Left need you to believe she is a fascist... "The politician's supporters see her as committed to upholding the values of God, family and country as European leaders increasingly embrace cosmopolitan and secular values of supranational organizations like the European Union as opposed to individual nation-states. However, mainstream media outlets have tied Meloni and her party to fascism. As conservative political commentator Ann Coulter pointed out, a New York Times article used the word 'fascist' or 'fascism' 28 times when discussing the possibility of a Meloni victory." Further down, the article continues:  "Meloni has elaborated on her philosophy in multiple speeches over the past few years-- In a speech at the World Congress of Families in 2019, she asked, 'Why is the family an enemy? Why is the family so frightening?  There is a single answer to all these questions' she suggested. 'Because it defines us. Because it is our identity. Because everything that defines us is now an enemy for those who would like us to no longer have an identity and to simply be perfect consumer slaves.' Meloni lamented what she viewed as attacks on 'national identity,' 'religious identity,' 'gender identity' and "'family identity.' She expressed concern that 'I can't define myself as Italian, Christian, woman, mother' but instead must define herself as 'citizen x, gender x, parent 1, parent 2. I must be a number. Because when I am only a number, when I no longer have an identity or roots, then I will be the perfect slave at the mercy of financial speculators,' she added. Meloni stated that her opposition to serving as 'the perfect slave at the mercy of financial speculators' is why 'we inspire so much fear.' Meloni vowed to 'defend the value of the human being,' stressing that 'each of us has a unique genetic code that is unrepeatable." You're meant to fear black shirts kicking down doors and beating people who go against the regime, but what the Left really seems to fear is that she'll be successful in delaying or halting their Great Reset plans.  More than jackbooted thugs, the Left fears Meloni's ability to stifle their agenda to establish a global, collectivist oligarchy.
30:18
October 03, 2022
What the Left desperately wants you to believe...
What the Left desperately wants you to believe...
The Left and the mainstream media are desperate for you to believe that Italian Prime Minister-elect Giorgia Meloni is a fascist.  She personifies a growing group of populists who reject woke ideology and globalism.  An article in the Christian Post by Ryan Foley explains both what is being said about her, and what Ms. Meloni says about herself and her party.  Here a couple of excerpts that explain why the Left need you to believe she is a fascist... "The politician's supporters see her as committed to upholding the values of God, family and country as European leaders increasingly embrace cosmopolitan and secular values of supranational organizations like the European Union as opposed to individual nation-states. However, mainstream media outlets have tied Meloni and her party to fascism. As conservative political commentator Ann Coulter pointed out, a New York Times article used the word 'fascist' or 'fascism' 28 times when discussing the possibility of a Meloni victory." Further down, the article continues:  "Meloni has elaborated on her philosophy in multiple speeches over the past few years-- In a speech at the World Congress of Families in 2019, she asked, 'Why is the family an enemy? Why is the family so frightening?  There is a single answer to all these questions' she suggested. 'Because it defines us. Because it is our identity. Because everything that defines us is now an enemy for those who would like us to no longer have an identity and to simply be perfect consumer slaves.' Meloni lamented what she viewed as attacks on 'national identity,' 'religious identity,' 'gender identity' and "'family identity.' She expressed concern that 'I can't define myself as Italian, Christian, woman, mother' but instead must define herself as 'citizen x, gender x, parent 1, parent 2. I must be a number. Because when I am only a number, when I no longer have an identity or roots, then I will be the perfect slave at the mercy of financial speculators,' she added. Meloni stated that her opposition to serving as 'the perfect slave at the mercy of financial speculators' is why 'we inspire so much fear.' Meloni vowed to 'defend the value of the human being,' stressing that 'each of us has a unique genetic code that is unrepeatable." You're meant to fear black shirts kicking down doors and beating people who go against the regime, but what the Left really seems to fear is that she'll be successful in delaying or halting their Great Reset plans.  More than jackbooted thugs, the Left fears Meloni's ability to stifle their agenda to establish a global, collectivist oligarchy.  
59:31
October 03, 2022
Liberty Relearned Podcast: Reductio ad Hitlerum
Liberty Relearned Podcast: Reductio ad Hitlerum
Some of you may remember reading this piece from the Liberty Relearned blog a while back:  So, you want to compare Trump and his followers to Hitler and the Nazis?  That was mainly regarding a quote by Donny Deutsch (remember him?) comparing Trump supporters to Nazis because of his handling of the illegal immigrants.  “If you vote for Trump, then you, the voter, you, not Donald Trump, are standing at the border, like Nazis.” Sadly, such reductio ad Hitlerum arguments still persist, especially coming from the Left, and continue to be aimed at Trump and his supporters.  This is an intellectually lazy argument. It often fails to establish any true parallel between either Trump's policies, or the beliefs of the rank-and-file Trump supporter and those common to the violent and authoritarian fascist regimes of the 20th century. They are filled with misrepresentations of the former President's words, and misconceptions about actual, historical fascism. So, is Trump the next Hitler?  Are his followers Nazis?  Are MAGA Republicans fascists? If Trump is a fascist, especially a Nazi, he's certainly a very poor one.  If his followers are fascists, they sure cling to a lot of non-fascists ideals.  One of the defining traits of Nazis was their violent antisemitism. Trump ended the Iran nuclear agreement, something that the Israelis celebrated, and their Prime Minister at the time called for in front of the UN.  This paved the way for one of Trump's in-laws, one of his Jewish in-laws to broker a peace deal between Israel and several neighboring Arab states.  He then moved the American embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. These are things that a true Nazi would have a hard time doing, and even a harder time selling to his supporters. COVID offered the perfect chance for any world leader to go full authoritarian, if not full fascist like Trudeau in Canada. Fascism calls for a supremely strong central government. So, what did Trump do?  He let the counties federalist system work, and allowed the sates, not the central government to make the calls.  Some states did go the authoritarian route, those were almost entirely blue (Democrat) states.  A true fascist would mandate such things as inoculations and mask wearing.  Trump didn't but his successor did to the greatest extent he could. Another central tenet of fascism is micromanagement in the affairs of business.  Fascism doesn't nationalize industries the way that typical socialism does, it merely asserts control over corporations, acting as a sort of chairman of the board on every board of directors in every corporation.  The illusion of private ownership remains under fascism, while effective control of companies goes to the state.  Everything inside the state, nothing outside the state, and nothing against the state.  One of the very first things Trump did upon taking office was to reduce the federal regulatory burden on companies, literally the antithesis of fascistic rule! Those who use the reductio ad Hitlerum argument do a disservice to the memory of all who suffered under actual Nazi-ism.  They also look foolish to those who know history and especially those who've studied actual fascism. Sadly, many on the left in particular, in their arrogance, don't know enough to be embarrassed, even in the face of proof their assertions are logically and historically wrong.
13:02
September 27, 2022
Reductio ad Hitlerum
Reductio ad Hitlerum
Some of you may remember reading this piece from the Liberty Relearned blog a while back:  So, you want to compare Trump and his followers to Hitler and the Nazis?  That was mainly regarding a quote by Donny Deutsch (remember him?) comparing Trump supporters to Nazis because of his handling of the illegal immigrants.  “If you vote for Trump, then you, the voter, you, not Donald Trump, are standing at the border, like Nazis.” Sadly, such reductio ad Hitlerum arguments still persist, especially coming from the Left, and continue to be aimed at Trump and his supporters.  This is an intellectually lazy argument. It often fails to establish any true parallel between either Trump's policies, or the beliefs of the rank-and-file Trump supporter and those common to the violent and authoritarian fascist regimes of the 20th century. They are filled with misrepresentations of the former President's words, and misconceptions about actual, historical fascism. So is Trump the next Hitler?  Are his followers Nazis?  Are MAGA Republicans fascists? If Trump is a fascist, especially a Nazi, he's certainly a very poor one.  If his followers are fascists, they sure cling to a lot of non-fascists ideals.  One of the defining traits of Nazis was their violent antisemitism. Trump ended the Iran nuclear agreement, something that the Israelis celebrated, and their Prime Minister at the time called for in front of the UN.  This paved the way for one of Trump's in-laws, one of his Jewish in-laws to broker a peace deal between Israel and several neighboring Arab states.  He then moved the American embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. These are things that a true Nazi would have a hard time doing, and even a harder time selling to his supporters. COVID offered the perfect chance for any world leader to go full authoritarian, if not full fascist like Trudeau in Canada. Fascism calls for a supremely strong central government. So, what did Trump do?  He let the counties federalist system work, and allowed the sates, not the central government to make the calls.  Some states did go the authoritarian route, those were almost entirely blue (Democrat) states.  A true fascist would mandate such things as inoculations and mask wearing.  Trump didn't but his successor did to the greatest extent he could. Another central tenet of fascism is micromanagement in the affairs of business.  Fascism doesn't nationalize industries the way that typical socialism does, it merely asserts control over corporations, acting as a sort of chairman of the board on every board of directors in every corporation.  The illusion of private ownership remains under fascism, while effective control of companies goes to the state.  Everything inside the state, nothing outside the state, and nothing against the state.  One of the very first things Trump did upon taking office was to reduce the federal regulatory burden on companies, literally the antithesis of fascistic rule! Those who use the reductio ad Hitlerum argument do a disservice to the memory of all who suffered under actual Nazi-ism.  They also look foolish to those who know history and especially those who've studied actual fascism. Sadly, many on the left in particular, in their arrogance, don't know enough to be embarrassed, even in the face of proof their assertions are logically and historically wrong.
53:33
September 26, 2022
Dystopic Journal, Atlas Shrugged: Individuality
Dystopic Journal, Atlas Shrugged: Individuality
John Galt's Speech Pt III: Individuality One of the themes of Atlas Shrugged, and of the Objectivist philosophy of Ayn Rand is the idea of all rights are individual rights.  She believed in the rights of minorities, and the smallest minority was the individual. Through John Galt's speech, she ties the idea that one owns oneself and that free will is one's chief possession. “That which you call your soul or spirit is your consciousness, and that which you call ‘free will’ is your mind’s freedom to think or not, the only will you have, your only freedom, the choice that controls all the choices you make and determines your life and your character.” Galt here, refutes the notion that anyone but him has a right to his life and happiness: “Just as I support my life, neither by robbery nor alms, but by my own effort, so I do not seek to derive my happiness from the injury or the favor of others, but earn it by my own achievement. Just as I do not consider the pleasure of others as the goal of my life, so I do not consider my pleasure as the goal of the lives of others. Just as there are no contradictions in my values and no conflicts among my desires-so there are no victims and no conflicts of interest among rational men, men who do not desire the unearned and do not view one another with a cannibal’s lust, men who neither make sacrifice nor accept them.” Again, Galt asserts he owes no one his life and happiness, nor does anybody owe him theirs.  He chides those who voluntarily make themselves subservient to others. He justifies morality of acting in one's own self-interest with the notion that one must reciprocate that same right to others.  Rather than accept natural obligation to others, he follows an ethos of mutual non-obligation, except as a voluntary act of self-interest on the part of all parties. “Do you ask what moral obligation I owe to my fellow men? None-except the obligation I owe to myself, to material objects and to all of existence: rationality. I deal with men as my nature and their demands: by means of reason. I seek or desire nothing from them except such relations as they care to enter of their own voluntary choice. It is only with their mind that I can deal and only for my own self-interest, when they see that my interest coincides with theirs. When they don’t, I enter no relationship; I let dissenters go their way and I do not swerve from mine. I win by means of nothing but logic and I surrender to nothing but logic. I do not surrender my reason or deal with men who surrender theirs. I have nothing to gain from fools or cowards; I have no benefits to seek from human vices: from stupidity, dishonesty or fear. The only value men can offer me is the work of their mind. When I disagree with a rational man, I let reality be our final arbiter; if I am right, he will learn; if I am wrong, I will; one of us will win, but both will profit.” Galt's speech ends with what one could call the “Objectivist Creed” .... “You will win when you are ready to pronounce the oath I have taken at the start of my battle-and for those who wish to know the day of my return, I shall now repeat it to the hearing of the world: “I swear-by my life and my love of it-that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine. -Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
20:37
September 19, 2022
Liberty Relearned Podcast: Constitution Day
Liberty Relearned Podcast: Constitution Day
Saturday, September 17th was Constitution Day in America. Happy 235th Birthday to the U.S. Constitution!  Why does the Constitution matter?  Let it explain in its own words:  "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."  The Constitution remains the greatest basis for a nation's government ever written.  Many countries have borrowed from it, none have improved upon it.  Strong as it is, it's only as strong as the Supreme Court Justices charged with following and interpreting it, and only as strong as the Citizens of the US are willing to allow it to be.  Hopefully the next 235 years will see it remain as strong, if not stronger, as it is now.
39:56
September 19, 2022
The Constitution and why it matters.
The Constitution and why it matters.
Saturday, September 17th was Constitution Day in America. Happy 235th Birthday to the U.S. Constitution!  Why does the Constitution matter?  Let it explain in its own words:  "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."  The Constitution remains the greatest basis for a nation's government ever written.  Many countries have borrowed from it, none have improved upon it.  Strong as it is, it's only as strong as the Supreme Court Justices charged with following and interpreting it, and only as strong as the Citizens of the US are willing to allow it to be.  Hopefully the next 235 years will see it remain as strong, if not stronger, as it is now.   This week in JP's Dystopic Journal, we continue with our analysis of John Galt's speech from Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. One of the central themes that runs through all of Rand's writings is the idea of individualism.  Growing up in the Soviet Union, she saw first-hand the evils of collectivism.  John Galt's speech near the end of Atlas Shrugged serves as a manifesto of sorts for Rand's Objectivist philosophy.  Rand, though Galt, lays out the principles of Objectivism in his speech, a 57-page monologue. Most if it provides justification for people to act in their own rational self-interest before anyone else's.  It refutes the notion that man should be forced to live for the sake of other men.  Rather than men being obligated to each other, Galt professes his preference for mutual non-obligation, he'll not be obliged to live for another person, and no other person should be obliged to live for him.  Until next time, Stay healthy, happy, and free! 
59:05
September 19, 2022
Dystopic Journal, Atlas Shrugged: Reason and Choice
Dystopic Journal, Atlas Shrugged: Reason and Choice
JP's Dystopic Journal continues with a further examination of John Galt's speech in Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand.  One of the themes of his speech, and a theme of Rand's is the idea that human beings are meant to have the capacity to act in their own best interests and the best interests of their loved ones. We should not outsource our decision making to others when it comes to matters of critical personal importance.  Adding to Galt's/Rand's commentary, I suggest The Creator gave us the gift of free will.  It's our ability to choose from different paths and select our own destinies that sets us apart from both the animals and the Angels.  Humans being their best selves and utilizing their gifts of life and liberty is good and moral.  Not doing those things, or depriving others from either life or free will is bad, immoral. Until next time, stay healthy, happy, and free! -JP Mac
18:57
September 13, 2022
Two national traumas.
Two national traumas.
In this episode, I talk about two traumatic events that greatly affected entire countries.  On September 8th, 2022, the United Kingdom lost their Queen, Elizabeth II.  Elizabeth was the longest reigning queen in Britian's history.  She will be sorely missed by Britain and the Western World. She is succeeded by King Charles III.  Charles has been outspoken in recent years on Leftist causes such as climate change and has attended the WEF summit in Davos, Switzerland.  He's going to have to put those days behind him and rule from the center.  When in doubt, he should ask himself-- "What would mother do?"  God save the King. The other traumatic event I talk about is the terrorist attack on the US on September 11th, 2001.  There was the immediate shock and horror the attacks on Washington, DC and New York caused, then there were many events that stemmed directly or indirectly from 9-11, like the invasion of Afghanistan and our ignominious surrender nearly 20 years later. The attacks lead to the Global War on Terror which provided the momentum needed to invade Iraq.  Our untimely withdrawal from Iraq lead to the establishment of the ISIS caliphate in the Levant. 9-11 brings up painful memories to those who experienced it either in person or on the television at the time.  Should we try to forget about it?  To do that would do a disservice to all who gave their lives, especially those firemen, policemen and first responders who committed so many conspicuous acts of courage and valor on that day and the days that followed.  We cannot forget for one brief period; Americans of all stripes were united.  We cannot forget the men and women of our armed forces and the scarifies they mad as a direct result of the attacks. We can never, ever forget 9-11-01.
37:18
September 12, 2022
God save the King...and us.
God save the King...and us.
In this episode, I talk about two traumatic events that greatly affected entire countries.  On September 8th, 2022, the United Kingdom lost their Queen, Elizabeth II.  Elizabeth was the longest reigning queen in Britian's history.  She will be sorely missed by Britain and the Western World. She is succeeded by King Charles III.  Charles has been outspoken in recent years on Leftist causes such as climate change and has attended the WEF summit in Davos, Switzerland.  He's going to have to put those days behind him and rule from the center.  When in doubt, he should ask himself-- "What would mother do?"  God save the King.   The other traumatic event I talk about is the terrorist attack on the US on September 11th, 2001.  There was the immediate shock and horror the attacks on Washington, DC and New York caused, then there were many events that stemmed directly or indirectly from 9-11, like the invasion of Afghanistan and our ignominious surrender nearly 20 years later. The attacks lead to the Global War on Terror which provided the momentum needed to invade Iraq.  Our untimely withdrawal from Iraq lead to the establishment of the ISIS caliphate in the Levant.  9-11 brings up painful memories to those who experienced it either in person or on the television at the time.  Should we try to forget about it?  To do that would do a disservice to all who gave their lives, especially those firemen, policemen and first responders who committed so many conspicuous acts of courage and valor on that day and the days that followed.  We cannot forget for one brief period; Americans of all stripes were united.  We cannot forget the men and women of our armed forces and the scarifies they mad as a direct result of the attacks. We can never, ever forget 9-11-01.   JP's Dystopic Journal continues with a further examination of John Galt's speech in Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand.  One of the themes of his speech, and a theme of Rand's is the idea that human beings are meant to have the capacity to act in their own best interests and the best interests of their loved ones. We should not outsource our decision making to others when it comes to matters of critical importance.  Added to Galt's/Rand's commentary, I suggest The Creator gave us the gift of free will.  It's our ability to choose from different paths and select our own destinies that sets us apart from both the animals and the Angels.  Humans being their best selves and utilizing their gifts of life and liberty is good and moral.  Not doing those things, or depriving others from either life or free will is bad, immoral.  Until next time, stay healthy, happy, and free!  -JP Mac
55:09
September 12, 2022
Dystopic Journal: The Speech from Hell
Dystopic Journal: The Speech from Hell
Recently, in Philadelphia, against a garish crimson and black backdrop reminiscent of every fascist trope, President Biden made a speech in which he demonized a large portion of the American electorate. He talks about “enemies of democracy” who he names as “MAGA Republicans”.  Though he claims that he speaks only of a small minority of Republicans, he leaves open to interpretation just who he means– from the January 6th rioters and their like, to anyone who flies a Trump flag, or had a Trump yard sign on their lawn.  Here’s as small sample of what he said: “We’re all called, by duty and conscience, to confront extremists who will put their own pursuit of power above all else. Democrats, independents, mainstream Republicans: We must be stronger, more determined, and more committed to saving American democracy than MAGA Republicans are to — to destroying American democracy.” — President Biden, September 1, 2022. Most of his speech goes like this, repeating the same canards about Trump supporters being a danger to democracy, and supporting violence. The podcast features most of his speech, laced with my biting and dare I say, witty commentary. Not one word of his speech talks about the real problems we face in America, rising inflation, skyrocketing crime rates, or the cost of energy.  Besides demonizing Trump and his supporters, the purpose of his speech seems to be to distract us from these real problems.
44:15
September 05, 2022
Supreme Leader Joe's Speech
Supreme Leader Joe's Speech
Recently, in Philadelphia, against a garish crimson and black backdrop reminiscent of every fascist trope, President Biden made a speech in which he demonized a large portion of the American electorate. He talks about "enemies of democracy" who he names as "MAGA Republicans".  Though he claims that he speaks only of a small minority of Republicans, he leaves open to interpretation just who he means-- from the January 6th rioters and their like, to anyone who flies a Trump flag, or had a Trump yard sign on their lawn.  Here's as small sample of what he said: "We’re all called, by duty and conscience, to confront extremists who will put their own pursuit of power above all else. Democrats, independents, mainstream Republicans: We must be stronger, more determined, and more committed to saving American democracy than MAGA Republicans are to — to destroying American democracy." -- President Biden, September 1, 2022.   Most of his speech goes like this, repeating the same canards about Trump supporters being a danger to democracy, and supporting violence.  The podcast features most of his speech, laced with my biting and dare I say, witty commentary.   Not one word of his speech talks about the real problems we face in America, rising inflation, skyrocketing crime rates, or the cost of energy.  Besides demonizing Trump and his supporters, the purpose of his speech seems to be to distract us from these real problems.   Until next time,  Stay healthy, happy and free!  And Happy Labor Day!  - JP Mac
52:42
September 05, 2022
Dystopic Journal, Atlas Shrugged
Dystopic Journal, Atlas Shrugged
In Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand wrote possibly her most iconic passage of fiction. In it, a mysterious figure comes out of the shadows after withdrawing from public life some twelve years earlier. During those twelve years of self-imposed exile, he formed his own community of talented, like-minded people he’s enticed to go on “strike” from an ungrateful society consumed with taking their achievements for their own. As a result of the strike depriving society of the inventors and entrepreneurs who made it run, the world has fallen into a state of disrepair and despair. Near the end of the story, Galt returns to explain his actions is this famous monologue known to us as “This is John Galt Speaking”. One of the chief themes of Galt’s speech is the idea that society had begun to hold sacrifice as its highest virtue, but Galt points out that in society’s twisted morality, societies concept of sacrifice was not that of noble self-sacrifice, it was responding to the demands of others that was held as a virtue. Virtue, in this fallen system, was to accede to the demands of others, even to the point of going against one’s own best self-interest. This “virtue” of sacrifice stemmed from or perhaps caused a widespread sense of entitlement. People had stared to believe that they were entitled to the efforts of others. We live in a world where countries have been convinced to sacrifice large portions of their economy, particularly in energy and agriculture. Over the past few decades, Germany as invested in renewable fuels such as wind and solar. Now, with war in Eastern Europe, it’s lost a large supply of gas and oil. It, and other countries will struggle to make up the difference and renewables will not be enough. Sri Lanka was convinced to undertake self-destructive economic measures in the name of achieving a high Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) score. It took out loans it could never repay and decimated its agricultural sector to the point that its people were going hungry. Other countries have followed Sri Lanka down this path. The Netherlands is deliberately regulating nearly a third of its farms out of business. Canada is acting in a similar fashion. Countries are practicing self-immolation in the name of the greater good. “Happiness is the successful state of life, pain is an agent of death. Happiness is that state of consciousness which proceeds from the achievement of one’s values. A morality that dares to tell you to find happiness in the renunciation of your happiness-to value the failure of your values-is an insolent negation of morality. A doctrine that gives you, as an ideal, the role of a sacrificial animal seeking slaughter on the altars of others, is giving you death as your standard. By the grace of reality and the nature of life, man-every man-is an end in himself, he exists for his own sake, and the achievement of his own happiness is his highest moral purpose.”– John Galt, in Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand The global elite would not agree with John Galt here. They say that a man’s highest purpose is to serve his fellow man. They say that, but their policies when put into practice, serve mainly them. These oligarchs and technocrats ask the Dutch farmer, the Canadian trucker, and the West Virginian coal miner to sacrifice their livelihoods for the good of their fellow man. They call the American that wants to be comfortable in their home during the summer as selfish, and they will call the European who wishes to be warm in their home during the winter selfish as well. Far from Galt’s words, the words of globalists such as Klaus Schwab are: “You’ll own nothing and be happy.”
27:53
August 29, 2022
Will Atlas shrug?
Will Atlas shrug?
In Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand wrote possibly her most iconic passage of fiction.  It is a monologue spoken by a mysterious figure that comes out of the shadows after withdrawing from public life some twelve years earlier. During those twelve years of self-imposed exile, he formed his own community of talented, like-minded people he's enticed to go on “strike” from an ungrateful society consumed with taking their achievements for their own.  As a result of the strike depriving society of the inventors and entrepreneurs who made it run, the world has fallen into a state of disrepair and despair.  Near the end of the story, Galt returns to explain his actions is this famous monologue known to us as “This is John Galt Speaking”. One of the chief themes of Galt's speech is the idea that society had begun to hold sacrifice as its highest virtue, but Galt points out that in society's twisted morality, societies concept of sacrifice was not that of noble self-sacrifice, it was responding to the demands of others that was held as a virtue. Virtue, in this fallen system, was to accede to the demands of others, even to the point of going against one's own best self-interest. This “virtue” of sacrifice stemmed from or perhaps caused a widespread sense of entitlement. People had stared to believe that they were entitled to the efforts of others. “You have heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis. You have said it yourself, half in fear, half in hope that the words had no meaning. You have cried that man’s sins are destroying the world and you have cursed human nature for its unwillingness to practice the virtues you demanded. Since virtue, to you, consists of sacrifice, you have demanded more sacrifices at every successive disaster. In the name of a return to morality, you have sacrificed all those evils which you held as the cause of your plight. You have sacrificed justice to mercy. You have sacrificed independence to unity. You have sacrificed reason to faith. You have sacrificed wealth to need. You have sacrificed self-esteem to self-denial. You have sacrificed happiness to duty.”  – John Galt, in Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand The downside of writing off student loan debt.  The idea of writing off student loan debt sounds good to those who owe, but how about for the rest of us?  What are some of the unintended consequences of forgiving student loan debt, or pushing student loans in general?  Those who celebrate and demand the forgiveness of these debts condemn the next generation to continuing soaring tuition costs.  It also encourages young people do pursue degrees that don't give them marketable skills.  
59:37
August 29, 2022
Fear and the Left
Fear and the Left
Fear is a powerful motivator.  It's a survival mechanism and it's been around probably for as long as animals have been around. It can have positive effects, fear of a bear for instance, it can make you stop in your tracks and slowly put some distance between you and it.  Fear of your family starving can make you hunt that same bear for food.  It also can be used against you.  Fear of the socialist coming and taking away all private property led to the rise of fascism in Europe.  The fascists in turn, used fear of beatings, killings, vandalism, and imprisonment to control the population that did not agree with their methods. Fear makes people treat others horribly. Look at what people did to each other during the height of the COVID pandemic. “Mask Nazis”, forced inoculations, masking of two-year-olds on airplanes and kids in school all became a thing because of fear. Businesses were shut, and our human rights to free speech, to assemble peacefully, and worship as we see fit, among others, were abridged with alarming ease and regularity by authorities on the word of experts. People who had developed natural immunity due to having the disease were fired for not getting vaccinated. A disease, dangerous to a certain portion of the population caused friends and neighbors to turn against each other. Even when it became apparent that some of the methods at best did little good, and at worst were counter-productive didn't matter, neither to those driven by fear, nor those who drove the fear. Fear of nature is one of the oldest fears. It's why smart people don't go out in a thunderstorm, build houses in dry riverbeds, or build condos in the Sahara. Humans, despite all our technology, still cannot predict with any great accuracy earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, or where lightning will strike next. We cannot even predict the weather more than a few days in advance. In ancient time, fear of Mother Nature caused people to throw others into volcanoes or disembowel them on stone alters. Centuries later, fearful still demand sacrifices be made in order to ensure good weather. We must sacrifice our farms, our comforts, sometimes even our livelihoods in the name of appeasing the gods of climate change. Entire countries have been destroyed, and still others are determined to follow their brothers down the path of economic and national suicide. Many of those most easily convinced to alter their lifestyles, even subordinate their well-being and the well-being of their families because fear overwhelmingly share another trait besides, and perhaps because of their fears. They tend to be members of the political and social Left.  They prostrate themselves at the feet of the state, and of so-called experts. They are fully prepared to make others do the same.  In fact, they scoff at those who don't share their often-irrational fears.  Fearing perhaps their inability to make it on their own, tends towards the various forms of collectivism and the inevitable authoritarianism that follows. On the other side of that same coin are the fear mongers who are all too willing to accommodate the fearful.  Fear is the coin of the realm for the Left. They employ tactics of fear and even terror to control others.  They use deception to exaggerate the nature of the danger, then they exaggerate or even falsify the effectiveness of their solutions.  They in turn fear that if they are not in control, someone else will be, or even worse...no one else, and that scares them the most. This sort of control also tends to be instrumental in achieving financial gains for those in power.   Convenient.
38:53
August 22, 2022
Fear: The coin of the Left's Realm
Fear: The coin of the Left's Realm
Fear is a powerful motivator.  It's a survival mechanism and it's been around probably for as long as animals have been around. It can have positive effects, fear of a bear for instance, it can make you stop in your tracks and slowly put some distance between you and it.  Fear of your family starving can make you hunt that same bear for food.  It also can be used against you.  Fear of the socialist coming and taking away all private property led to the rise of fascism in Europe.  The fascists in turn, used fear of beatings, killings, vandalism, and imprisonment to control the population that did not agree with their methods. Many of those most easily convinced to alter their lifestyles, even subordinate their well-being and the well-being of their families because fear overwhelmingly share another trait besides, and perhaps because of their fears. They tend to be members of the political and social Left.  They prostrate themselves at the feet of the state, and of so-called experts. They are fully prepared to make others do the same.  In fact, they scoff at those who don't share their often-irrational fears.  Fearing perhaps their inability to make it on their own, tends towards the various forms of collectivism and the inevitable authoritarianism that follows. On the other side of that same coin are the fear mongers who are all too willing to accommodate the fearful.  Fear is the coin of the realm for the Left. They employ tactics of fear and even terror to control others.  They use deception to exaggerate the nature of the danger, then they exaggerate or even falsify the effectiveness of their solutions.  They in turn fear that if they are not in control, someone else will be, or even worse...no one else, and that scares them the most. This sort of control also tends to be instrumental in achieving financial gains for those in power.   Convenient. Back at Mar a Lago... It's becoming clear that the search for classified documents was just a pretense for the FBI to go on a fishing expedition. What were they fishing for?  Possibly evidence they believed that Trump documents that would exonerate him with regards to the Russia collusion hoax and implicate members of the deep state.  The swamp creatures in the DOJ and the Biden Regime would like nothing more than any documents that could exonerate Trump to disappear.  
58:49
August 22, 2022
Right problem, wrong solution?
Right problem, wrong solution?
Right problem, wrong solution?  The WEF put this out, so immediately it's suspect, but let's entertain the thought, nonetheless.  Online abuse is a real problem and occurs constantly.  Someone has proposed a way to help fight it.  So, what's the problem with that?  The problem is that who gets to decide what is "harmful"?  Who would be the subject matter experts mentioned in this scheme? The same people who decide what is racist, homophobic, or Islamophobic?  The same people who censored any information that questioned any the CDC's or WHO's recommendation on fighting COVID? Will adding AI add impartiality into the system, or simply amplify the agendas of those who control it?
20:22
August 15, 2022
Poking the bear
Poking the bear
Right problem, wrong solution? The WEF put this out, so immediately it’s suspect in the minds of many, but let’s entertain the proposal, nonetheless. Online abuse is a real problem and occurs constantly. Someone has proposed a way to help fight it. Here’s an excerpt from the article entitled: The solution to online abuse? AI plus human intelligence “The ‘Trust & Safety’ intelligent solution to detect online abuse While AI provides speed and scale and human moderators provide precision, their combined efforts are still not enough to proactively detect harm before it reaches platforms. To achieve proactivity, trust and safety teams must understand that abusive content doesn’t start and stop on their platforms. Before reaching mainstream platforms, threat actors congregate in the darkest corners of the web to define new keywords, share URLs to resources and discuss new dissemination tactics at length. These secret places where terrorists, hate groups, child predators and disinformation agents freely communicate can provide a trove of information for teams seeking to keep their users safe. The problem is that accessing this information is in no way scalable. Classic intelligence collection requires deep research, expertise, access and a fair amount of assimilation skills – human capacities that cannot be mimicked by a machine.” – Inbal Goldberger via WEForum.org So, what’s the problem with that? The problem is that who gets to decide what is “harmful”? Who would be the subject matter experts mentioned in this scheme? The same people who decide what is racist, homophobic, or Islamophobic? The same people who censored any information that questioned any the CDC’s or WHO’s recommendation on fighting COVID? Will adding AI add impartiality into the system, or simply amplify the agendas of those who control it? Last week, President's Trump's home, Mar a Lago was searched by the FBI looking for classified documents.  Why did the FBI execute a search warrant instead of just subpoenaing the documents in question?  Did the Biden Administration have a secondary motive, like provoking the Republican base? We who support Trump and/or the conservative cause must be careful not to be goaded into an emotional response.  There is a time and place for those angered by the raid on Trump's home, that time is November, and the place is the ballot box.  The Democrats will do anything to marginalize and demonize Trump and his supporters.  We must not be baited into acting as they would, as demonstrated during the summer of 2020.  
56:55
August 15, 2022
Our dystopia and how we got in it
Our dystopia and how we got in it
If you had a time machine and went back to the late 20thCentury, then wrote a book giving an accurate depiction of life in America or Europe today, it would be classified as a work of dystopic fiction. The book would be compared with 1984, Atlas Shrugged, or any number of novels depicting a dystopian future. Most of the people that read it would hope that our society and culture would develop along a better, saner path.  It's to the point where one would swear the people today see Orwell's 1984, not as a warning to humanity, but as in instruction book.  We now live in the type of world that authors like Orwell, Rand, and Huxley tried to warn us about. How did this dystopia come to be?  It's important to understand that we didn't get here overnight.  In fact, or current situation has been over a hundred years in the making.  Over the last century, a group we would now refer to as the “Left”, spurred on by two philosophies, collectivism and postmodernism have been vying for and gaining political power in the world.  Collectivism is the idea that man's highest purpose is to serve the needs of society.  The individual's needs are subordinate to those of the collective.  Examples of collectivism include communism, socialism, and fascism.  The ends of the Left is some sort of collectivist Utopia. Postmodernism is a philosophy that refutes the notion of objective reality.  It refutes the Enlightenment notion that Man advances his situation mainly though reason. The Enlightenment philosophies are the basis of modern Western democracies in general, and of the United States in particular. Enlightenment thinking stands in the way of establishing a collectivist Utopia, and so must be supplanted in the body-politic by the post-modern viewpoint.  Postmodernism can be said then, to be the philosophic means to that collectivist end.
05:39
August 10, 2022
JP's Dystopic Journal
JP's Dystopic Journal
Our dystopia and how we got in it. If you had a time machine and went back to the late 20th Century, then wrote a book giving an accurate depiction of life in America or Europe today, it would be classified as a work of dystopic fiction. The book would be compared with 1984, Atlas Shrugged, or any number of novels depicting a dystopian future. Most of the people that read it would hope that our society and culture would develop along a better, saner path. It’s to the point where one could swear some people today see Orwell’s 1984, not as a warning to humanity, but as in instruction manual. We now live in the type of world that authors like Orwell, Rand, and Huxley tried to warn us about. How did this dystopia come to be? It’s important to understand that we didn’t get here overnight. In fact, our current situation has been over a hundred years in the making. Over the last century, a group we would now refer to as the “Left”, spurred on by two philosophies, collectivism and postmodernism have been vying for and gaining political power in the world. Collectivism is the idea that man’s highest purpose is to serve the needs of society. The individual’s needs are subordinate to those of the collective. Examples of collectivism include communism, socialism, and fascism. The ends the Left have in mind is some sort of collectivist Utopia. Before they can build their brave new world, they must tear down the old one. Postmodernism is a philosophy that refutes the notion of objective reality. It refutes the Enlightenment notion that Man advances his situation mainly though reason. Enlightenment philosophies are the basis of modern Western democracies in general, and of the United States in particular. Enlightenment thinking stands in the way of establishing a collectivist Utopia, and so must be supplanted in the body-politic by the post-modern viewpoint. Postmodernism can be said then, to be the philosophic means to that collectivist end.
59:30
August 08, 2022
A 3rd Party?
A 3rd Party?
American Pride Month comes to an end/ A slow news week A New third party?  Reporting by Sharyl Attkisson and Tim Reid for Reuters talks about a new third party called the "Forward" party to compete with the Republicans and Democrats that is due to launch this fall. Is this the real deal, or just a party to run spoiler candidates against one party or the other?  Why hasn't America had a successful third party?  Covid stats update from Worldometers. Covid, like many diseases, has developed a pattern of peaking during cold weather months, and receding during warm weather in most of the world. 
59:21
August 01, 2022
Your suffering means little to them
Your suffering means little to them
Nowadays, the challenges Americans are facing are myriad and are on many fronts. Most of the suffering we are made to endure is by design.  The pain felt by the average American-- the high cost of household items, energy, gas, etc., is a pain not shared by the collectivist elites whose policies caused these problems. Our need to be free, to control our own destinies is in conflict with the elites' need for evermore power.  Our loss is their gain.  Here are some examples... Inflation The cost we pay for Democrats buying votes and paying off their allies High cost of tuition Big Education keeps churning out new Democrats in exchange for almost unlimited tuition costs High cost of energy Makes alternative sources of energy seem more economically viable High cost of gas Makes electric vehicles more economically viable while limiting the freedom that cars provide.  Vaccine and mask mandates Each jab means more money for Big Pharma.  Every mask is a symbol of submission.  High crime and lawlessness A perverse example of "social justice", and an excuse to gain control over state and local police forces. 
59:22
July 25, 2022
You are not real to them
You are not real to them
It's like that cynical, old joke: “It's all about mind over matter; they don't mind, and you don't matter.” It may be a joke, but it's apropos to the apparent mindset of the global elite as typified by the World Economic Forum (WEF).  The Green agenda, the Great Reset and other agendas being pursued by those self-appointed philosopher kings we refer to as the “global elite” are taking their toll on ordinary people around the world. Dutch farmers are being told that nearly a third of their cattle need to go, and that they cannot use nitrogen-based fertilizers at the levels currently sustaining their crops.  The Sri Lankans were convinced to take on unsustainable debts to improve their social programs and to trade in tried-and-true farming principles to go 100% organic.  Listening to the advice of the globalists cost them their economy and their country. Farmers there, and in the Netherlands, as well as other countries are being told to forget what they have learned from centuries of farming to maximize food production in the face of a global food shortage and pursue suicidal polices prescribed to them by an international oligarchy of bankers and industrialists. In the United States, the war on fossil fuels was dealt a brief setback with the Supreme Court ruling that the EPA does not have carte blanche when it comes to regulating the U.S. energy industry.  Still, parts of the country are being warned to cut down on air conditioner usage for fear of brownouts. It's not that there's not enough energy under the ground, it's that the darlings of the green movement, wind and solar are woefully inadequate when it comes to U.S. energy needs. People are going hungry in Sri Lanka.  Farmers in the Netherlands will be driven out of business.  Europeans will freeze and Americans will sweat.  Because their governments have decided to chase good ESG scores, instead of following best farming practices, people will go hungry and perhaps even starve this winter. Europeans if they don't go hungry, face the real possibility of freezing this winter, again because of short sighted whims of Eco-fascists.  According to Worldeconomics.com, Sri Lanka had a near-perfect 98.1 ESG score, suggesting in was following the globalists' plan to a tee. The Netherlands boasts a lusty 90.7 score.  Part of that score we can safely assume, is due to their commitment to lower nitrogen usage, best farm practices be damned. The Dutch government's slavish devotion to leftist environmental policies continues in the face of a world-wide food shortage.  That same environmental left in the U.S. Has convinced the Biden administration to continue its war on fossil fuels, despite energy costs skyrocketing adding to an already bad inflation problem.  People all across the globe will suffer.  Most of them, needlessly.   So, why are so many made to suffer for so little benefit to them? There are many reasons for sure-- foolish belief in Utopian schemes, lust for power, and greed on the part of the global elites.  These people who occupy the top rungs of industry, academia, and politics are insulated from the effects of their questionable economic and environmental theories. They are not affected by inflation.  They themselves will not feel neither cold, heat, nor hunger in any amount that might make them uncomfortable. They are, in short, not us. They have the luxury of operation in a world of economic and environmental theory, they are not part of the real world, the world the rest of us plebs inhabit.  To them, we are but statistics, numbers on a spreadsheet.
58:45
July 18, 2022
AKA: Democracy
AKA: Democracy
Independence Day, 2022 may have come and gone, but we can still celebrate #AmericanPrideMonth throughout the month of July.  American Exceptionalism is too great to just dedicate a single day, or a single long weekend to.  In the shadow of the Dobbs v Jackson ruling overturning Roe v Wade, comes another critical SCOTUS ruling-- West Virginia v EPA.  Despite Democrats howling about the 'death of democracy', these recent SCOTUS rulings will not men the death of democracy, quite the contrary, as this article from the Daily Signal points out.   From the article:  "The implications of West Virginia v. EPA will be discussed and debated for a long time to come. Regardless of those discussions, it’s already clear that in addition to rejecting unauthorized EPA overreach, the Supreme Court has helped to protect the voice of the American people and restore the nation’s republican form of government." Contrary to what some have said, the Dobbs and West Virginia rulings are victories, not defeats for our democracy and our republic.  They put these matters into the hands of the legislatures and the people where they can be debated and voted on.  What's that thing called?  You know-- where people get a say on how important issues are handled? Oh, yeah, it's called DEMOCRACY.  Until next time,  Stay happy, healthy, and free! 
59:32
July 11, 2022
Independence Day Message, 2022
Independence Day Message, 2022
The United States of America became a country in 1776 and the Declaration of Independence was its establishing document. Historians can quibble whether the nation's birthday is on July 2nd, or July 4th, or even August 2nd when most of many of the delegates signed it. The USA was not founded in 1619, and its establishing document was not the Mayflower Compact or the Jamestown Charter. It has one Declaration of Independence, and therefore only one Independence Day, celebrated on each 4th of July. Now that that's out of the way... How, with all the current division and by what right do we celebrate America's birthday? Yes, the country is divided-- as much as it's ever been since the end of the Civil War. We must note that those who drive the division are not aligned with the Founders vision for our country. Their political philosophies of socialism, fascism and the authoritarian style that come with them are foreign to these shores. They are not truly for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They may claim they are for these things but in reality, are for: death, subservience, and the pursuit of pleasure and power. Freedom of speech, assembly, and religion all have come under assault from the Left in recent years. America was founded as, and remains nominally, a free market-capitalist country. The Left has pressed and sadly, achieved a level of statism approaching economic fascism, causing supply shortages, rampant inflation, and an energy crisis. Yet despite this, America remains the greatest country the world has ever seen. Our Constitution has so far proven as a bulwark from the worst of the Left's progressive polices, even on occasion, rolling back their excesses. The Founders, in their genius, made it hard for tyranny to take root in our nation due to the U.S. Constitution. This document should be considered a landmark human achievement. Many opponents to the concepts that America was formed upon use several recent Supreme Court rulings that checked the power they seek as examples of how our democracy is being destroyed. They are mistaken. Only a fool would for instance, claim that a ruling (Dobbs v Jackson) that removes a critical issue, abortion, from the sphere of unelected officials and remands it back to the states, where citizens are once again free to vote on it, would call such a ruling a “failure” of democracy. Another ruling which curtails the power of unelected officials in the EPA and other government agencies and forces these issues to be dealt with by the legislative branch or the states is a victory, not a defeat for democracy. Other recent rulings reaffirming 1st and 2nd Amendment rights serve to strengthen the wall between us and subjugation known as the Constitution. We may not like the state of our government, our leaders, or the direction that the country is currently moving in but still, It's OK to love America.
59:04
July 04, 2022
Debunking Roe v Wade Myths
Debunking Roe v Wade Myths
Popular Pro-abortion arguments and why they fail. By now, you know that Roe v. Wade has been overturned and the abortion question has been remanded back to the states.  There has been predictably, an explosion of posting both pro and against abortion. Here are some of pro-abortion arguments, talking points, and myths you may have heard.  I'll be addressing these and others in the podcast: What about the 12-year-old rape victim?  You want to force her to have a child?  This argues from the extremes, but I'll bite.  My answer is “no” and here's why:  While national abortion statistics can be hard to find we can get an idea of the numbers from various studies. According to one study, less than 1% of abortions were done as a result of a women or girl being raped. From the Western Journal article:  Facts: The Truth About Rape/Incest Abortions That Every American Needs to Know: “Statistics from Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration show that of the 70,083 abortions that were carried out in 2018, just 0.14 percent (101 abortions) were sought 'due to rape.” Perfect is the enemy of the good here. I'd rather not add a human death to a rape, but 99% is a lot bigger that 1% and so I and many other pro-lifers are comfortable allowing for exceptions for rape and incest, as well as the life of the mother.  I'm not aware of any law that does not make these exceptions. Most abortions are performed in the first eight weeks, therefore do not end a life.   It's (the baby) not alive, it's just a clump of cells. It is a life.  It may be a “clump of cells”, but it gathers nourishment, grows, and develops according to instructions in its DNA- human DNA.  It is living and that thing that is living is a human being under development. The Supreme court took away a woman's right to an abortion. The decision in the Dobbs v Jackson basically said that women never had a constitutional right to abortion to begin with.  It follows therefore, that women never had that right to lose.  The Court back in '73 basically cobbled together a right that was not in the Constitution. Critics of Roe v Wade have long held that the Court made a bad ruling that required a lot of legal and intellectual gymnastics to be decided the way it was.
59:40
June 27, 2022
Fathers Matter
Fathers Matter
A short history of Juneteenth Father's Day Message: Why fathers matter.   Austin's minimum wage hike Austin's plans to infringe gun rights.  Past episodes you might like
59:27
June 20, 2022
Economic Fascism is Still Fascism
Economic Fascism is Still Fascism
Economic Fascism is Fascism When people think of the word “fascism” they think of groups of jackbooted thugs, running around, kicking down doors and rounding up enemies of the state.  They think of book burning, and a mad dictator whipping up his sycophants into a frenzy to terrorize the public.  That is indeed a major part of it.  State sponsored violence is a component of fascism, but the mistake people make is assuming it's the only part.  There is another, less spoken of expression of fascism-- one not as dramatic, but every bit as much a scourge on society in the final analysis.  The economic component of fascism was ends to which the violence, and terror were but a means. The point of the marches, pogroms, and demagoguery was to establish an economic system totally under the heal of the ruling party, the state.  The economic control in turn was the means to achieving the ultimate goal of all the state's power centralized in the person of a supreme dictator who spoke for and personified the State. From La Dottrina del Fascismo, by Giovanni Gentile and Benito Mussolini: “We have constituted a Corporative and Fascist state, the state of national society, a State which concentrates, controls, harmonizes and tempers the interests of all social classes, which are thereby protected in equal measure. Whereas, during the years of demo-liberal regime, labour looked with diffidence upon the state, was, in fact, outside the State and against the state, and considered the state an enemy of every day and every hour, there is not one working Italian today who does not seek a place in his Corporation or federation, who does not wish to be a living atom of that great, immense, living organization which is the national Corporate State of Fascism. (On the Fourth Anniversary of the March on Rome, October 28, 1926, in Discorsi del 1926, Milano, Alpes, 1927, p. 340).” From The Economic Foundations of Fascism, by Paul Einzig, (Fascism fanboy, British economist,1897–1973) in 1934: “Anyone who wishes to keep himself up to date should know that, besides being a political movement, Fascism is essentially an economic system-- a compromise between pure individualistic Capitalism and complete State control.” Einzig again: It is only by combining the desire of economic interests to cooperate with the guidance of the central authority that planning can be made to succeed.” “Clearly, the will to build a better society does exist. We must use it to secure the Great Reset that we so badly need. That will require stronger and more effective governments, though this does not imply an ideological push for bigger ones. And it will demand private-sector engagement every step of the way.” – Klaus Schwab, Now is the time for a 'great reset'
58:56
June 13, 2022
The War Against the Armed Citizen
The War Against the Armed Citizen
The new war against armed citizens In the wake of several high-profile mass shootings, and chronic gun-violence in cities like Chicago and Philadelphia, both Biden and Trudeau are calling for a raft of new anti-gun legislation. President Biden wants Congress to pass “common sense” gun legislation.  He says it won't infringe on 2nd Amendment rights.  Huh? A June 3rd Article in Fox News outlines his plans. Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau has predictably jumped on the anti-gun bandwagon.  Though the recent mass shootings did not occur in his country, he nonetheless has proposed legislation that would “freeze” gun sales in Canada.  A recent article in Breitbart, Justin Trudeau Moves to Ban Purchase and Sale of Handguns in Canada, gives the details. Funny, these leaders are talking about having fewer guns, but not fewer mass-murderers.  It's almost as if they were trying to solve a problem other than the legions of psychopaths our upside-down secular society has produced that commit these heinous crimes. Biden's latest anti-gun rhetoric makes sense, the midterm elections are coming up and the Democrats have no accomplishments to run on.  Trudeau's anti-gun proposals are curiously timed and may be more telling of what the ultimate goals of both leaders is.  To understand what they're ultimate goals are, one merely needs to ask:  What plans for their respective countries do they have that can only be done, or more easily be done, with a disarmed citizenry?  Trudeau and other leaders of Commonwealth countries, namely Australia and New Zealand have already shown their hand during the pandemic.  They want a more authoritarian form of government.  They want to implement a form of 21st Century Eco-fascism.  Ditto, our President, though it's more his party than him who expect to benefit. Disarming the citizenry has never produced a safer nation.  Quite the opposite, it enables forms of tyranny.  Disarming a population has never ended with the people of that nations being freer. Never. Once. Ever. Further reading:  When a Population is Disarmed:  A Brief History of Tyranny, American Gun News 2017
53:15
June 06, 2022
Because some gave all...
Because some gave all...
The saying “All gave some; some gave all,” is attributed to Korean War veteran and Purple Heart recipient, Howard William Osterkamp. It was true for the Korean War, and all the wars Americans fought in before and since. This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all. They all gave their lives for their country, and we enjoy what freedom we have because of them. Even today, some give all, and all who enjoy their freedom should honor their sacrifice by giving some. Especially today, we see Ukrainians and others give their lives for their countries. Most of us in America and Europe are not called to give of themselves to such an extreme degree. We saw over the last two years how quickly we can lose our freedoms and slip into authoritarianism. Though we probably won't be asked to give all as many are, we can, and should join SGT Osterkamp in giving some. Volunteering as first responders, to the military, giving to refugees, supporting life, serving on school boards, at church, standing for freedoms in ways great and small. Because some gave all, all must give some. Happy Memorial Day!  Stay happy, healthy, and free.   -JP Mac
34:60
May 30, 2022
Replacement vs. Displacement
Replacement vs. Displacement
Replacement vs. Displacement Critical Race Theory (CRT) came to the forefront of American politics during the height of the pandemic when parents across the country were shocked to find anti-white racism in their children's curriculum.  CRT and its offshoot social-justice phenomena ironically termed “anti-racism” that seeks to cast all inequities in Western Civilization in a racial light.  They are part of the leftist world view called “cultural Marxism” which basically states that all power inequities result in an oppressor/oppressed dynamic.  The side with the greater social, economic, or political power will inevitably use it to oppress persons or groups with less power. The Democrats believed they have found in 'Replacement Theory' what the Republicans did with CRT-- a target they can aim their political energy at. They saw grass roots Republicans coalesce around the issue of 'anti-racism'. They saw Glenn Youngkin win in VA, and scores of Republican and conservative candidates successfully define and attack CRT: the intellectual underpinning of intersectionality. The Democrats believe they have found the equivalent on right, Replacement Theory. The problem is, the average conservative does not know what Replacement Theory is, much less subscribe to it. The Democrats will attempt to conflate Replacement Theory with any stance on a strong border or stronger immigration controls. Watch for this as the midterms draw nearer. The World Economic Forum is meeting again in Davos, Switzerland. Here is the only two questions worth asking:  If the plans being hatched by the attendees of the WEF come to fruition, will the average person enjoy more or less freedom?  Will Klaus Schwab and the other attendees have more power or less over the average person if their plans are executed as they envision?  Wherever they're discussing at Davos, it's a safe bet it's not how they can best diffuse and divest their power.
58:11
May 23, 2022
The leak heard 'round the world
The leak heard 'round the world
Have you seen 2000 Mules yet?  Go see it but listen to my podcast first!  A UPI article dated 5/14/22 states that Jeff Bezos thinks the 'ministry of truth' should investigate...The Biden Administration?  This should be interesting...    The leak heard 'round the world.  Who leaked the SCOTUS decision likely overturning Roe v. Wade and why? (Someone thinks they know) Did I mention 2000 Mules?  Facebook, the Democrats, and a lot of the mainstream media doesn't want you to see it.  They might as well beg us!  Until next time, stay happy, healthy and free!
58:39
May 16, 2022
Holes in the Mules?
Holes in the Mules?
Dinesh D'Souza has a great new movie out about alleged ballot trafficking in during the 2020 election called 2000 Mules. In the film he talks to members of the voter integrity watchdog group True the Vote.  TTV used the technology of geotracking, tracking someone's movements though their cellphones.  TTV alleges that people called "mules" were paid to deliver harvested votes to drop boxes in various places, an act called vote trafficking, which is illegal. Vote trafficking is different than voter fraud in that fraud entails an element of deception.  Vote or ballot trafficking is the hiring of a person or persons to deliver ballots from one place to the ballot drop boxes.  Even in places where ballot harvesting is legal, (collecting votes not one's own, usually from a large number of people) it is illegal to pay someone to do it or to pay them to stuff the ballot in a drop box.   An AP article entitled:  FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot ‘mules’ Ali Swenson claims to poke holes in the 2000 Mules account of things.  Does it really?  The 'holes' read more as rationalizations than facts that debunk any of the movie's claims.  One of the more ridiculous 'holes' claimed is that people started wearing gloves when they dropped off ballots, not to keep their fingerprints off the ballots or drop boxes, but to keep their hands warm.  Do most people you know wear surgical gloves to keep their hands warm? We're supposed to buy that excuse?  Any why by the way, were many of the people shown deliver handfuls of ballots in the middle of the night?  Are we supposed to believe that someone in one case, had an entire backpack full of ballots that were legally obtained by voters who couldn't deliver them themselves?  In summary, go see the movie, you can stream it or buy the DVD.  Buy it, watch it, and invite some friends.  It's too late unfortunately, to affect the outcome of the 2020 election, but we have an very important election coming up in the fall of 22, and another in 24.  It's critical that we put pressure on our elected leaders to be on the lookout for signs of vote trafficking schemes.  Either eliminate drop boxes altogether or at the very least, have them video surveilled 24/7 for the entire election season. We must have faith in our elections restored to everyone.   Also, there was this little incident-- a draft of a Supreme Court ruling, which if it stands, would overturn Roe v. Wade and remand abortion laws back to the states.  Wherever you fall on the issue of pro-life or pro-choice, you should be alarmed that a SCOTUS decision, for the first time in our history, was leaked.  It was apparently leaked for partisan purposes.  We cannot allow Justices to be intimidated into voting one way or another. Leaking decisions is not acceptable, period.  
01:11:50
May 09, 2022
The Ministry of Truth
The Ministry of Truth
The Ministry of Truth They call it the “Disinformation Governance Board”.  Some of us have another name for it-- The Ministry of Truth. The DHS says its focus will mainly be on false or misleading information getting out, attracting illegal immigrants from places like Haiti to come here.  The Associated Press recently ran a piece on it, giving the official rationale for its inception. The story claims DHS will only use the board to investigate and counter the actions of foreign actors.  Sorry, but past experience in this area makes us a little skeptical.  The Hunter Biden laptop story for instance was squashed with just the mere supposition that it was Russian disinformation.  The suppression of this story may have affected the outcome of the 2020 election. An article posted in RealClearPolitics.com had a slightly more skeptical take.  It questioned the Constitutionality of the program and raised questions about its administrator, Nina Jankowicz, who's been accused of spreading disinformation about the Hunter Biden laptop story. I guess it can be truly said she is an expert in disinformation, some of it coming from her peers. This makes Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter even more important.  If another story comes along like Hunter Biden “laptop from Hell”, the Left won't be able to count on Twitter to just suppress it.  They will need the might of the DHS 'Ministry of Truth' to put behind their suppression efforts. Given the record of Democrat administrations abusing their power such as with the IRS targeting conservative organizations, and the FBI and CIA's involvement with the Russian Collusion Hoax, we can expect the DHS, with their new Ministry of Truth, to also be abused also to partisan ends.   We'll be watching for it, count on it. Until next time, Stay happy, healthy, and free!
48:31
May 02, 2022
Season 2 Review
Season 2 Review
Season 2 of the Liberty Relearned Podcast covered a lot of ground, from Bidens expensive and empty promises, the philosophy of Ayn Rand, to Covid, Fascism, and Woke Disney.  Included are clips from previous episodes of the podcast.  
53:41
April 25, 2022
Freedom and the Easter Message
Freedom and the Easter Message
Elon Musk has emerged as a champion of free speech and is trying to buy Twitter so he can reform it to being the world's premier free-speech platform.  The Left of course will have none of it.  They like being able to dictate who and what can be said in the free world's virtual public square.  They are doing everything they can to throw a monkey wrench into Musk's plans to wrest control of Twitter from the tech tyrants. They'll even act against their own financial best interests to maintain their control over public discourse. Will they succeed?  We'll be watching with great interest how this story unfolds.  Easter Message, 2022 Easter celebrates the Resurrection, and calls to mind the cycle of life, death, and rebirth. In the Northern Hemisphere, it is celebrated as a spring holiday. Spring seems like the appropriate season to celebrate the resurrection of Christ. The rebirth of the natural world around us reminds us of Jesus’ restoration to life. The world in 2022 seems to be in the spring cycle as it emerges from the scourge of Coronavirus pandemic and destructive authoritarianism. Slowly, we see our freedoms coming back to life. Most of us at least, can work, play, and worship with renewed freedom and with restored vigor. But, just as not every tree and plant grow back its foliage, and just as not every flower will bloom at the same time, nor will every nation, state, and town be restored. The total restoration takes time, but the arrival of summer is a force of nature. Mammals awake from their winter slumber, they may be weak at first, but nature drives them to seek nutrition. Humans also emerge requiring sustenance, not just for the body, for their minds and spirit as well. We’ve lived through a two-year winter of death– physical, moral, and spiritual. Just as nature drives the newly awakened bear to search for what will give it and its family life, nature calls for us to restore the spiritual, intellectual, and emotional balance to our lives. Easter reminds us that just as Jesus was reborn as a higher eternal form of himself, that we can and must strive to do this same. Life and freedom are the twin gifts the Creator has given to us. As one or the other becomes diminished, their restoration, rebirth, resurrection, once started becomes a force of nature. As we will it, death gives way to life, fear to courage, and oppression to freedom. Become one with that force of nature that demands the scales be re-balanced in favor of our Divine right, and perhaps achieve in the process, a rebirth to a higher form of spiritual life. Paschal blessings to you! -J.P. Mac
58:16
April 18, 2022
Avoiding a food shortage
Avoiding a food shortage
It's not the sexiest of subjects for the conservative or libertarian, but agricultural practices and distribution do have an effect on our everyday life.  It doesn't tend to be a problem in the West, because actually, we're quite good at it.  When war threatens the production and distribution of food worldwide, then it becomes a problem, and we must take notice and immediate action. The answer, which may be surprising to some, it to let the free market/capitalist system do its thing.  In the podcast, we go over an article from the Heritage Foundation that provides suggestions on what the U.S. Should, and shouldn't be doing. Spoiler alert!  The answer isn't greater interference from the central planners in D.C. Our government must correctly identify our priorities.  If you're looking down the barrel of a worldwide food shortage, maybe the priority should be food production.  Asking the current administration in Washington to set its green agenda aside in favor of a greens agenda may be a lot to ask, but we have to get this right, not just for our sake, but for the sake of billions across the globe. We can revisit the need for an electric car in every garage and a windmill on every street corner after we've dealt with the potential of mass starvation. For reference: https://www.heritage.org/government-regulation/report/what-the-us-should-do-now-minimize-the-risk-global-food-shortages#
59:23
April 11, 2022
Don't say Disney
Don't say Disney
Don't say Disney... So, of course after Florida Gov Desantis signed the Parental Rights in Education bill, HB 1557 into law, the woke leadership of Disney have gone nuts.  In the media it's been inaccurately portrayed as a 'don't say gay' bill. In reality, it's a 'don't corrupt our children with non-age-appropriate instruction on sexuality, gay, straight, or otherwise' bill. Disney, which specializes in children's entertainment, is oddly cool on the subject of corruption of minors.  In fact, the corruption of children may just be official company policy. An article, Swimming Against the Tide, Disney Takes Wokeness to a New Level from Real Clear Politics, sums up Disney's expectedly woke agenda. Quitting Disney might be hard, they're ubiquitous in popular media.  They own ABC, the Marvel MCU, and Star Wars.  Boycotting Disney “proper”, the movies, the theme parks, especially if you have young kids, might be a place to start. Meanwhile, the Russo-Ukrainian War (as I've dubbed it) is still going strong, long after anybody, especially the Russians, thought it would.  Why did it start and more importantly, how will it end? Did you miss an episode?  Covid is over as a crisis, everyone but the most stubborn control freaks realize this.  On this subject, I humbly recommend checking out my podcast “The COVID crisis in its death throws” from last month. To help with Ukrainian relief (These are trusted, well-established charities):         Catholic Relief Service (CRS), Ukraine relief         International Committee of the Red Cross, Ukraine relief
01:08:58
April 04, 2022
Virtues of the Right
Virtues of the Right
Virtues of the Right: Capitalism  Voluntary exchange of goods and services  Capitalists cannot succeed unless they are offering something of value Life  Conception to natural death Rule of Law/consent of the governed  Free, fair elections, one person, one vote.  Everyone is equal under the law  Free speech  All points of view should be allowed to be heard.  Individualism  Judging people as individuals. The rights of the individual.  Citizen control of government Government through legislation, not regulation.  Libertarianism, conservatism  Preserving the value of liberty. The government that governs least, governs the best. (attributed to Thomas Jefferson) Equality of opportunity We are not born with equal abilities and strengths but have equal right to use them  Private control of resources, production  Essential element of capitalism.  Fair and voluntary commerce.  Natural (God-given) rights  Some rights are necessary to the pursuit of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It is not for any government to take them away.  Personal responsibility The freedom to fail.  Mature persons understand the relationship between their actions and consequences and are expected to respect the rights of others.  Ends in accord with the means Only just actions can produce just results.  Truth stems from facts  There is an ultimate truth that is not subject to our passions and prejudices Western Civilization Our civilization is based upon the principles borne of the Athens-Rome-Jerusalem triumvirate of social, moral, and political teachings
59:40
March 28, 2022
Left vs Right
Left vs Right
What determines what is "left" and what is "right" politically and socially? What are some of the core values of each ideology and how are they manifested in today's society? Essentially, it comes down to collective vs. individual ethics. The left believes in collectivism and the right, individualism. Communism, socialism, and fascism are all examples of collectivist socio-economic societies. The right seeks to conserve Western Civilization, the Left seeks to tear it down and replace it with a collectivist Utopia.  The problem with Utopias is they cannot exist without a high degree of authoritarianism.  In the podcast, I refer to a chart that lists several core values of the left and the corresponding value of the right.  Until next time, stay happy, healthy, and free. 
59:35
March 21, 2022
Pork is back on the menu.
Pork is back on the menu.
Pork is back on the menu.. Congress just passed an omnibus budget that approves $1.5T in spending, much of it pork-laden. Of course, with a Democrat Congress in the current era, most of that pork is going to fund woke agenda items. Nancy Pelosi decided to use the war in Ukraine as leverage, tying a Ukraine support package to the greater omnibus. There is a good article by Matthew D. Dickerson from the Heritage Foundation that lists some of the woke pork. From the article: “1.  Earmarks were banned by conservatives a decade ago after high-profile cases of corruption were exposed. 2.  Unfortunately, earmarks are making a big return in President Joe Biden’s first appropriations package. 3.  None of these earmarks have anything to do with carrying out the proper, limited roles of the federal government enumerated in the Constitution.” Speaking of the situation in Ukraine... Poland wanted to give Ukraine some of its Soviet-era fighters.  Somehow this turned into a botched, overly complicated effort. Putin knows the West has been and continues to supply Ukraine with lethal military equipment. Does it really matter at this point if the system destroying the Russian tank or APC is air or land-based? To help with Ukrainian relief (These are trusted, well-established charities): Catholic Relief Service (CRS), Ukraine relief International Committee of the Red Cross, Ukraine relief Until next time, Stay healthy, happy, and free.
01:00:00
March 15, 2022
The state of the union is good for whom?
The state of the union is good for whom?
Here's my hot take on the President's SOTU speech. He started out pretty well by saluting the armed forces and people of Ukraine. It was all pretty much downhill from there. It took a lot of intellectual gymnastics to spin anything he did into a success. He used Covid as an excuse for runaway inflation. Everyone knows that emerging from Covid restrictions played only a part of it. He tried to spin it as the inflation was because the economy was improving too fast! He rehashed his already doomed Build Back Better program. His most laughable moment was when he claimed he wanted to secure our border. I don't know how he got through that line with a straight face. Good news, funding, rather than defunding the police is now the policy of his administration! Even that bit is suspect. What he's not telling you is that the end result