Skip to main content
Reza Hasmath

Reza Hasmath

By Reza Hasmath

Reza Hasmath (Ph.D., Cambridge) is a Full Professor in Political Science at the University of Alberta. His award-winning research looks at: (1) the life course experiences, and public management, of ethnic minorities in global contexts; (2) state-society relationships in China, and how the activities of emerging state/non-state actors affect international development and global affairs; (3) the evolving behaviour of policy actors and citizens in authoritarian regimes; (4) global sustainability and ESG principles/practices; and, (5) the essentialist qualities of the self, community and state.
Available on
Apple Podcasts Logo
Google Podcasts Logo
Pocket Casts Logo
RadioPublic Logo
Spotify Logo
Currently playing episode

Managing Modern Government - 11 - Lecture Eleven - Government-NGO Relationships II

Reza HasmathFeb 14, 2021

00:00
13:59
The Decline of Democracy and Advance of Autocracy

The Decline of Democracy and Advance of Autocracy

In many parts of the world, democratic values and institutions are being eroded, while autocrats and ‘strongmen’ are gaining power in democratic nations, and consolidating it in autocratic ones. This panel talk dissects the causes and consequences of these alarming trends, examining case studies from multiple regions, as well as cross-cutting themes such as the role of disinformation, populism and polarization. What can be done to protect against these forces? And what are the prospects for reversing the decline of democracy and the advance of autocracy?

Feb 02, 202401:10:16
Discourse, Deliberation and Difference in an Authoritarian Public Sphere
Dec 14, 202355:21
The Altruistic Authoritarian Citizen? Understanding (Non-)Participation in Philanthropic and Voluntaristic Activities in Contemporary China
Dec 13, 202343:10
How China Sees the World in 2023
Jun 02, 202338:36
Future Responses to Managing Muslim Ethnic Minorities in China: Lessons Learned from Global Approaches to Improving Inter-Ethnic Relations

Future Responses to Managing Muslim Ethnic Minorities in China: Lessons Learned from Global Approaches to Improving Inter-Ethnic Relations

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. The Context

3. Short Term Strategies (Under a Year)

4. Medium Term Strategies (1 to 3 Years)

5. Long Term Strategies (3 Years Plus)

6. Conclusion

Abstract:

Current policies to manage ethnic minority unrest in Xinjiang are not working, and they do not address the core root causes behind ethnic tensions. Drawing upon lessons learned from global approaches to improve inter-ethnic relations, and factoring China’s institutional behaviour and norms, this essay looks at policy responses that can be entertained by the state to improve the conditions of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. It suggests that in the short-term (under a year) the state can be more responsible in using the big data it collects for targeted surveillance, in tandem with a community engagement approach. In the medium-term (1-3 years), the state can employ practices to reduce ethnic prejudice by encouraging increased meaningful intergroup contact, and promoting a positive media portrayal of ethnic minorities. In the long-term (3 years plus), improving the relative socio-economic ethnic inequalities is paramount. 

Citation:

Hasmath, R. (2022) “Future Responses to Managing Muslim Ethnic Minorities in China: Lessons Learned from Global Approaches to Improving Inter-Ethnic Relations”, International Journal 77(1): 51-67. 

Available in Chinese, French, German and Japanese:

中国管理穆斯林少数民族的未来应对措施:从改善民族间关系的全球方法中吸取的教训

Réponses Futures à la Gestion des Minorités Ethniques Musulmanes en Chine: Leçons Tirées des Approches Mondiales pour Améliorer les Relations Interethniques

Künftige Reaktionen auf den Umgang mit Muslimischen Ethnischen Minderheiten in China: Lehren aus Globalen Ansätzen zur Verbesserung der Interethnischen Beziehungen

中国におけるムスリム少数民族の管理に対する今後の対応:民族間関係を改善するためのグローバルなアプローチから学んだ教訓

Jan 30, 202347:30
Civic Engagement, Volunteerism and Philanthropy in Contemporary China
Dec 16, 202201:00:19
The Construction and Performance of Citizenship in Contemporary China
Oct 23, 202250:14
Citizens’ Expectations for Crisis Management and the Involvement of Civil Society Organizations in China
Sep 08, 202229:28
Volunteerism and Democratic Learning in an Authoritarian State: The Case of China

Volunteerism and Democratic Learning in an Authoritarian State: The Case of China

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. Framework

3. Methodology

4. Results and Findings

5. Implications and Conclusion

Abstract:

Extant literature on civic participation in Western democracies demonstrates a linear relationship between increased civic participation and a stronger democracy. In general, the scholarly debate revolves around the precise causal mechanisms for this relationship: holding government accountable; citizens learning ‘democratic skills’, such as collective mobilization and advocacy; and, building social capital and trust to overcome the dilemma of collective action. Given the rapidly increasing volunteerism in China, this study tests these theories in an authoritarian setting using evidence from the 2020 Civic Participation in China Survey. The study finds that volunteers in China do learn ‘citizen skills’; however, these differ from those learned by volunteers in democracies. Foremost, while volunteering allows for authoritarian citizens to learn and differentiate channels most appropriate for addressing specific social problems, they generally do not try to directly hold their government accountable for poor performance. Additionally, the study finds limited support that volunteers are seeking to develop trust in other citizens, contra evidence from Western democracies. Finally, the results suggest that volunteers are participating as a means to send signals to the state that they are emerging local community leaders. These findings have important implications for increasing civic participation in authoritarian regimes. 

Citation:

Teets, J., Hasmath, R., Hildebrandt, T., Hsu, C. and Hsu, J. (2022) “Volunteerism and Democratic Learning in an Authoritarian State: The Case of China”, Democratization 29(5): 879-898. 

Available in Chinese:

权威主义国家的志愿服务和民主学习: 以中国为例:民众对国家所有制和市场监管的态度

Sep 06, 202245:51
Cyber Technology and the European Union’s Gestaltian Approach to China
Sep 06, 202222:55
The Saliency of 'White Privilege' in a Multicultural Society
Apr 14, 202215:48
Does Naming and Shaming China on Human Rights Work?

Does Naming and Shaming China on Human Rights Work?

This talk looks at the effectiveness of international organizations naming and shaming China when it comes to alleged human rights violations. It draws upon all publicly available human rights reports pertaining to China between 1991 and 2021, from Amnesty International (AI), Human Rights Watch (HRW), and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). It suggests that the OHCHR is more successful in influencing China’s human rights’ behaviour, followed by HRW and AI. Part of the reasoning for this is the fact OHCHR and HRW have adopted a broader conception of human rights centred along both political and civil rights, and economic, cultural and social rights; with AI focusing largely on political and civil rights’ issues. Since its foundation, the P.R. China has placed greater priority on economic, cultural and social rights, rendering less inertia for OHCHR and HRW to employ a naming and shaming strategy.

Apr 13, 202230:42
Economic Legitimation in a New Era: Public Attitudes About State Ownership and Market Regulation

Economic Legitimation in a New Era: Public Attitudes About State Ownership and Market Regulation

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. Economic Legitimation and Authoritarian Resilience

3. Methodology

4. Perceptions of State Ownership

5. Perceptions of Market Regulation

6. Discussion

7. Conclusion

Abstract:

Autocrats typically seek public support on the basis of economic growth-promotion and redistribution policies, and China is no exception. As important as these factors are for authoritarian resilience, we argue that economic legitimation is a more complex phenomenon than has previously been acknowledged. Beyond improvements in material well-being, citizens form judgments about the state’s effectiveness in carrying out a variety of economic roles beyond growth-promotion and they also care about the fairness of these market interventions. In this study, we use original survey data collected in late 2015 and early 2016 to evaluate Chinese citizens’ perceptions of two economic roles of the state that have been hotly debated in recent years: state ownership and market regulation. We find that while citizens view the ideas of state ownership and interventionist regulation in a generally positive light—suggesting a broad level of agreement in Chinese society about what economic functions the state ought to perform—perceptions of how the state actually carries out these roles are more mixed. Our results show that the urban young are especially inclined to critical evaluations, raising the question of how the Chinese Communist Party’s legitimation strategy will fare under conditions of inter-generational value change. 

Citation:

Eaton, S. and Hasmath, R. (2021) “Economic Legitimation in a New Era: Public Attitudes About State Ownership and Market Regulation”, The China Quarterly 246: 447-472.

Available in Chinese:

新时代的经济合法化:民众对国家所有制和市场监管的态度

Feb 02, 202241:22
Exploring Political Personalities: The Micro-Foundation of Local Policy Innovation in China
Feb 02, 202253:07
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 11 - Lecture Eleven - Foreign Relations
Nov 13, 202120:31
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 10 - Lecture Ten - Internationalization and its Effects
Nov 11, 202116:20
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 9 - Lecture Nine - Civil Society and Citizen Participation
Oct 24, 202114:38
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 8 - Lecture Eight - Marginalized Groups
Oct 24, 202118:48
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 7 - Lecture Seven - Ideological Development and Performance
Oct 22, 202123:57
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 6 - Lecture Six - Popular Legitimacy and Accountability
Oct 09, 202122:57
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 5 - Lecture Five - Government-NGO Relationship
Sep 24, 202127:04
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 4 - Lecture Four - Government-Private Enterprise Relationship
Sep 23, 202115:02
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 3 - Lecture Three - Bureaucratic Operations and Configurations
Sep 19, 202117:40
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 2 - Lecture Two - The Onset of Reforms
Sep 02, 202133:33
Introduction to Chinese Politics - 1 - Lecture One - The Path to Modernization
Aug 31, 202128:60
The Incentive to Innovate? The Behavior of Policymakers in China

The Incentive to Innovate? The Behavior of Policymakers in China

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. Understanding Incentives for Innovation: Using an Evolutionary Framework

3. Innovation Under Recentralization

4. Implications for Innovation

Abstract:

Despite playing a key contributing role in China’s economic reforms and the Party’s regime durability, there has been a noted reduction in local policy experimentation. Using semi-structured interviews with policymakers in Beijing, Zhejiang and Shenzhen, we find that although recentralization efforts at the central-level are impacting local officials, a great deal of variation in policy experimentation outcomes still exists. Thus, the puzzle motivating this study is how do local officials react to these institutional changes to decide whether or not to engage in local policy innovation? Our study offers three potential explanations for why local officials vary in their willingness to continue policy experimentation: (1) the ineffectiveness of the vertical reward and punishment systems operated by the Party-state; (2) differing base preferences of local officials; and, (3) the presence of a cohort effect.  These factors “filter” institutional changes to result in variation at the local level. As such, we find strong support for an evolutionary process predicated on individual preferences interacting with institutional incentives such as the evaluation system and the networked-structure of cadre knowledge. Although some officials are still conducting policy experimentation, the overall reduction in innovation strongly suggests that potential solutions to governance problems remain trapped at the local level, and that the central government might lose this “adaptable” governance mechanism that has contributed to its past economic and political successes.

Citation:

Teets, J., Hasmath, R. and Lewis, O. (2017) “The Incentive to Innovate? The Behavior of Policymakers in China”, Journal of Chinese Political Science 22(4): 505-517.

Aug 25, 202136:03
The Innovative Personality? Policymaking and Experimentation in an Authoritarian Bureaucracy

The Innovative Personality? Policymaking and Experimentation in an Authoritarian Bureaucracy

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. Theoretical Framework

3. Methodology

4. Findings and Discussion

5. Implications and Conclusion

Abstract:

Why do local officials in an authoritarian bureaucracy experiment with policy, even when directed not to do so by central-level officials? This study suggests that policy experimentation in this institutional environment can best be understood as an interaction between the structure in which local officials are embedded, and individual-level personality attributes. Leveraging a new data set from a series of original surveys with local policymakers in mainland China, conducted between 2016 and 2018, we discern three base-line personality types: authoritarian, consultative and entrepreneurial. We thereafter examine the individual-level characteristics of local officials who will innovate irrespective of a centralization of bureaucratic power and interests, as currently experienced under Chinese President Xi Jinping. We find that local policymakers engage in policy innovation when they are more focused on resolving governance problems, and that increased risk reduces but does not eliminate their willingness to innovate. Based on these findings, we contend that future studies of policy innovation should use an evolutionary framework to examine the interaction between preferences and selection pressures.

Citation:

Hasmath, R., Teets, J. and Lewis, O. (2019) “The Innovative Personality? Policymaking and Experimentation in an Authoritarian Bureaucracy”, Public Administration and Development 39(3): 154-162.

Aug 25, 202131:22
Big Business, NGOs and Labor Standards in Developing Nations: A Critical Reflection
Aug 25, 202143:41
Social Development in the Tibet Autonomous Region: A Contemporary and Historical Analysis
Aug 25, 202101:02:58
NGOs in China: Issues of Good Governance and Accountability
Aug 25, 202128:52
When a Joke is More than a Joke: Humor as a Form of Networked Practice in the Chinese Cyber Public Sphere
Aug 24, 202140:37
The Evolution of Policy Experimentation in China

The Evolution of Policy Experimentation in China

Contents:

1.  Introduction

2.  Explaining the Motivations for Policy Experimentation

3.  Motivations for Policy Experimentation under Xi Jinping

4.  Conclusion

Abstract:

Most scholars credit policy experimentation with China’s successful economic reforms and continued authoritarian resilience. This article contributes to this policy experimentation literature by providing a systematic overview of the motivations incentivizing Chinese policy entrepreneurs to experiment at local levels. This article traces the evolution of policy experimentation in China through the prism of understanding the varying motivations for experimentation, such as individual career incentives, improving good governance, and symbolic and factional politics. Despite the benefits of policy experimentation, there has been a notable reduction in experimentation in the Xi Jinping era due to the recentralization of political power through “top-level design” and an ongoing anti-corruption campaign. This has effectively created disincentives to innovate at the local level. Nevertheless, we do find remaining pockets of policy experimentation that we argue are due to ineffective institutional incentives, the influence of peer groups, and variations in the individual personalities of policymakers. However, it is unclear if the remaining experimentation is robust enough to assist in further economic reforms or adaptive governance.

Citation:

Teets, J. and Hasmath, R. (2020) “The Evolution of Policy Experimentation in China”, Journal of Asian Public Policy 13(1): 49-59.

Jul 08, 202134:10
Rethinking Global Civil Society in an Era of a Rising China

Rethinking Global Civil Society in an Era of a Rising China

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. Theoretical Framework

3. The Contemporary Behaviour of Chinese Social Organizations

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Abstract:

The concept of global civil society arose out of a language, culture and definition influenced by mainstream Western political philosophy and discourse, and the behaviour of Western NGOs that proliferated in the latter part of the 20th century. The recent rise of Chinese social organizations internationally – who were born, developed and prospered in a domestic authoritarian institutional environment with varying values and norms than their Western counterparts – suggests a rethink of how global civil society is conceived. Namely, as Chinese social organizations internationalize, they ultimately export to host nations their best/worst practices, modes of operation, organizational behaviour, and their values and norms. This article looks at the experiences of Chinese social organizations domestically and abroad, and discerns how their actions and behaviour potentially confirms, modifies and/or rejects the contemporary conceptual understanding of global civil society.

Citation:

Hasmath, R. and Hsu, J. (2021) “Rethinking Global Civil Society in an Era of a Rising China”, The China Review 21(3): 221-246.

Available in Chinese, French, German, Japanese and Russian:

论述中国崛起时代如何重新思考全球公民社会

Repenser la Société Civile Mondiale à l'Ère de la Montée en Puissance de la Chine

Die Globale Zivilgesellschaft in einer Ära des aufstrebenden Chinas neu denken

台頭する中国の時代におけるグローバル市民社会の再考

Переосмысление глобального гражданского общества в эпоху восходящего Китая

Jun 29, 202101:03:59
A Maturing Civil Society in China? The Role of Knowledge and Professionalization in the Development of NGOs
Jun 14, 202147:52
NGO Strategies in an Authoritarian Context, and their Implications for Citizenship: The Case of the People’s Republic of China

NGO Strategies in an Authoritarian Context, and their Implications for Citizenship: The Case of the People’s Republic of China

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. Social Organizations and Organizational Fields

3. National Level Constraints: Political Authoritarianism and Cultural Unfamiliarity

4. Local Constraints

5. Methodology and Sample

6. Results: Regional Variations in Resource Strategies

7. Discussion: Resource Strategies and Citizenship

8. Conclusion

Abstract:

This study argues that different cities in China have different resource environments available for NGOs. Organizations react to these resource environments by constructing appropriate resource strategies, which in turn shape the characteristics and structures of the NGOs of that city. It further examines how these characteristics and structures influence the construction and performance of citizenship in an authoritarian environment. Specifically, some types of NGOs encourage Chinese citizens to be passive, while others offer a model for people to actively engage with social issues. This is aptly demonstrated in an analysis of NGOs operating across four cities – Beijing, Shanghai, Kunming, and Nanjing – which reveals three different types of resource environments and behavioural models for NGOs. We subsequently discuss the implications of each model for citizen engagement.

Citation:

Hsu, J., Hsu, C. and Hasmath, R. (2017) “NGO Strategies in an Authoritarian Context, and their Implications for Citizenship: The Case of the People’s Republic of China”, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28(3): 1157-1179.

Available in Chinese and German:

专制主义环境下的NGO 策略,及对公民身份的影响:中国案例

NGO-Strategien in einem autoritären Kontext und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Staatsbürgerschaft: Der Fall der Volksrepublik China

Jun 14, 202101:02:16
Navigating Uncertainty: The Survival Strategies of Religious NGOs in China
Jun 13, 202148:56
A Community of Practice for Chinese NGOs

A Community of Practice for Chinese NGOs

Jun 12, 202143:34
‘Going Out’ or Staying In? The Expansion of Chinese NGOs in Africa
May 29, 202154:07
Isomorphic Pressures, Epistemic Communities and State-NGO Interactions
May 24, 202150:23
The Local Corporatist State and NGO Relations in China
May 24, 202101:07:48
Deterring the ‘Boat People’: Explaining the Australian Government's People Swap Response to Asylum Seekers
May 24, 202146:08
The Discursive Construction and Performance of Gendered Identity on Social Media
May 24, 202157:16
White Cat, Black Cat or Good Cat? The Beijing Consensus as an Alternative Philosophy for Policy Deliberation

White Cat, Black Cat or Good Cat? The Beijing Consensus as an Alternative Philosophy for Policy Deliberation

Contents:

1. Introduction

2. The Original Conception

3. Conflation with the China Model of Development

4. Future Direction and Implications for China

Abstract:

The Beijing Consensus represents a philosophical movement towards an ultra-pragmatic view of conducting policy deliberation. Contrary to models of development which provide a subset of policy prescriptions for the policymakers’ disposal or a fundamentalist adherence to a particular economic tradition, the Beijing Consensus inherently recognises that each development scenario has a potential set of challenges that may require unique and/or experimental solutions factoring the current political, economic and social environments. This ultra-pragmatism will require the policymaker to engage in greater policy experimentation, and to have a larger risk-elasticity. Further, this philosophy is most aptly demonstrated by looking at the aggregation of practices and lessons learned using the recent policy experiences of China. Ironically, this leads to a potential confusion regarding the analytical distinction between the Beijing Consensus and the Chinese model of development. This article outlines this distinction, and further theorises the potential consequences of employing an ultra-pragmatic view of policy deliberation espoused by the intentionality of the Beijing Consensus.

Citation:

Hasmath, R. (2017) “White Cat, Black Cat or Good Cat? The Beijing Consensus as an Alternative Philosophy for Policy Deliberation”, China’s World 2(1): 12-24. 

Available in Chinese:

白猫,黑猫还是好猫?“北京共识” 作为政策思维的另类哲学

May 10, 202133:51
The Impact of the European Union’s Policy Towards China’s Intellectual Property Regime
May 10, 202152:22
What Explains the Rise of Majority-Minority Tensions and Conflict in Xinjiang?
Apr 05, 202142:17
Managing Modern Government - 16 - Lecture Sixteen - Future Prospects
Mar 24, 202113:34
Managing Modern Government - 15 - Lecture Fifteen - The Gender Perspective
Mar 24, 202123:41
Saying Sorry: How States Can Effectively Apologize
Mar 22, 202124:00
Conceptualizing Government Organized Non-Governmental Organizations
Mar 16, 202157:43
Managing Modern Government - 14 - Lecture Fourteen - The Ethnic Minority
Mar 13, 202123:33