Arts Union Science
By Tyler D. R. Vance
Brought to you by Scientists and Science-Adjacent Film Buffs.
Arts Union ScienceMar 10, 2024
2023 AUS Grant Panel - Episode 2
"Now I am become death - the destroyer of worlds."
As promised, the fall out of our AUS Grant Panel is reaching its second phase, as we continue discussing the 10 films that are up for both an Academy Award for Best Picture and an AUS Grant. Join your co-hosts Tyler D. R. Vance and Jennie S. Orton as they dissect the last 5 of the 10 films, focusing on the quality of their filmmaking, their relevance to the year 2023, and the excitement they garner for future endeavors from the filmmaking team. Along the way, they'll tremble before the might of the all-might Bomb, be silenced by a room of white people, listen to a 1950s version of a true crime podcast, stare into the wrong eye for hours, and trundle on down the steps into hell itself.
Stay tuned at the end of the episode for a SPOILER SECTION.
"I think I have the requisite experience and insight to aver that you are and always have been penis cancer in human form."
TIME STAMPS: Conversations for specific movies start at
Oppenheimer ==========5m 55s
American Fiction========36m 18s
Killers of the Flower Moon=54m 43s
The Holdovers==========1h 16m 24s
Zone of Interest=========1h 35m 20s
SPOILER SECTION:
Past Lives==============1h 52m 30s
Zone of Interest=========1h 58m 20s
Killers of the Flower Moon=2h 7m 50s
Anatomy of a Fall========2h 14m 9s
2023 AUS Grant Panel - Episode 1
"Oh my God! You've never seen 'The Godfather'? This movie is a rich blend of genius and a triumph that Robert Evans..."
We have returned! After a few months hiatus to attend to the little larval human that I recently became custodian to, the Arts Union Science podcast has returned to once again tackle the ten films up for Best Picture at the Academy Awards. And wouldn't you know it, these same films are also contending for the equally coveted AUS Grants that we give out each year.
Join your co-hosts Tyler D. R. Vance and Jennie S. Orton as they rattle on about 5 of the 10 best picture nominees, focusing on the quality of their filmmaking, their relevance to the year 2023, and the excitement they garner for future works from the intrepid artists that made them. Along the way, they'll spend time in Barbie Land, the Alps, New York during the fledgling years of the Internet, Yorgo Lanthimos's weird-ass head, and the splash zone of a bird full of shit.
"Any questions?"
TIME STAMPS:
Conversations for specific movies start at ...
Barbie ========== 6m 35s
Poor Things ====== 37m 20s
Anatomy of a Fall == 59m 40s
Maestro ========= 1h 17m 25s
Past Lives ======== 1h 36m 29s
Art. U. Sci. 8(2): The Batman
Welcome back to particularly dark episode of the Arts Union Science Volume 8. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and - back by popular demand - this week's first author (Sean W. Phippen) as they travel back to Gotham to look at the cape crusader's most recent outing: The Batman. Along the way, they'll stop to smell the warm tones, wonder who "won the scene", and rank all the other Batman movies ('cause that's what you do these days).
If you'd like to review our findings, feel free to leave us a message at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. Check out the rest of our episodes on Google Podcast, Spotify, Apple Podcast, etc. Also, feel free to learn more about the podcast at www.artsunionscience.ca.
"Fear is a tool. When that light hits the sky, it's not just a call. It's a warning."
AUS Future Me Archive: Episode 3 - 2001 A Space Odyssey and Deep Red
"I'm scared."
Welcome to the third unsealing of the Future Me Archive! Join Future Tyler and Future Steven as they continue their journey through the movies they've always meant to watch but never got a chance to, until now. In this episode, the terrible twins take on a Stanley Kubrick classic that was NOT made in the '90s, "2001: A Space Odyssey" (#2 on Steven's List), and a blast from Italy's past, "Deep Red" (#16 on Tyler's List). Along the way, they'll wonder at the ingenuity of old-timey filmmakers, make some blasphemous remarks that are sure to both at least a few film bros out there, and wax poetic about the nature of homage and inspiration in film.
If you'd like to tell us what's on your Future Me Archive, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com, or message us on one of them new fangled social media platforms. For more on The Future Me Archive and all things AUS, check out our website at artsunionscience.ca.
"Really, that's good. Very good. Maybe a bit too good ... Too clean. Yes, too precise. Too ... formal. It should be more trashy. See what I mean?"
Art U. Sci. 8(1): The Green Knight
“Oh Greatest of Kings, indulge me in this friendly Christmas game.”
Perhaps it is fitting that we begin the long awaited first episode in Volume 8 with The Green Knight – a tale of repeated failure in the face of unrealistic expectations (many of them self imposed). Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and a returning first author / Viking-hater (David Brown) as the two take a look at the chivalric code and how quickly it succumbs to inherent human vices. Along the way, they’ll get into a spirited debate / blood bath about Robert Eggers’ The Northman, marvel at the deepness of Ralph Ineson’s voice, and gush about the bestest little CGI fox in the whole kingdom.
If you’d like to review our submission, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. You can also find us on Facebook, Instagram, and at our own fancy little website: www.artsunionscience.ca (courtesy of Harv Communications https://harvcommunications.ca/).
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 8, releasing every two weeks (or so) on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“Why greatness? Why is goodness not enough?”
AUS Future Me Archive: Episode 2 - No Country For Old Men / Coherence
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"
Welcome to the second unsealing of the Future Me Archive! Join Future Tyler and Future Steven as they continue their journey through the movies they've always meant to watch but never got a chance to, until now. In this episode, the pair take on the strange duo of the Coen Brothers' Oscar-Winning NOT Spaghetti Western, "No Country For Old Men" (#15 on Steven's List), and the low-fi sci-fi never-heard-of-it classic, "Coherence" (#17 on Tyler's List). Along the way, they'll figure out who John Hamm is and who John Hamm is not, refuse to learn about Oscar history, and tumble down the levels of a spoiler staircase.
If you'd like to tell us what's on your Future Me Archive, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com, or message us on Instagram or Facebook. For more on The Future Me Archive and all associated AUS series, check out our website at artsunionscience.ca.
"No, we're not splitting up. We're just going to go in two separate groups."
Art U. Sci. Announcement May 2023
We have an announcement to make concerning the state of the podcastial nation and what our future holds. Tune in!
Arts Union Science Grant Panel 2023: Conclusion
“My suit … My tailor … Goodbye.”
Hello and welcome to the final episode in this year’s AUS Grant Panel! Join your co-hosts Tyler D. R. Vance and Jennie S. Orton as they discuss the most fabulous night in Hollywood, AKA the 95th Academy Awards. Along the way they’ll discuss the lack of love for Banshees of Inisherin, the blasphemy of slighting Babylon’s score, and the Cinderella story that is Everything, Everywhere, All at Once. Then, the dynamic duo announce the winners of the three AUS Grants for this year. Wanna know who won? Then give the episode a listen (or skip to the ~35 minute mark and carry on with your day).
If you’d like to review our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can also find us on Facebook or Instagram, if social media is your poison of choice. For more episodes of from Arts Union Science, check us out on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your ear candy.
“Our apologies to Matt Damon …”
Arts Union Science Grant Panel 2023: Episode 2
The Oscar's are fast approaching and there's only one thing on everybody's mind: I wonder when the folks at Arts Union Science are going to get their poop in a group and finish reviewing them movies.
Well wait no longer, for the Arts Union Science Grant Panel has reassembled to award the best in cinema with one of our coveted AUS Grants. In this episode, panel co-chairs Tyler D. R Vance and Jennie S. Orton gather to discuss the next 5 of the 10 films nominated for an AUS Grant ... and I've heard that they're also up for an Oscar or something. The discussion is spoiler free, but if you want to be entirely fresh when going into a particular movie, you can find the time stamps below so you can skip to the films you wish to hear about.
If you would like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. You can also join our small-but-mighty community on Facebook or Instagram.
PS. The name of the film critic mentioned in the discussion on Everything, Everywhere, All at Once is Walter Chaw from Film Freak. Check out his reviews of Turning Red and Everything, Everywhere, All at Once at the links below:
https://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2022/03/turning-red.html
https://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2022/03/everything-everywhere-all-at-once-1.html
This episode includes discussions on:
All Quiet on the Western Front (8:55 - 24:45)
Tar (24:45 - 37:28)
Avatar: The Way of Water (37:28 - 52:28)
Elvis (52:28 - 1:13:46)
Everything, Everywhere, All at Once (1:13:46 - 1:31:03)
Arts Union Science Grant Panel 2023: Episode 1
The Oscar’s are fast approaching and there’s only one thing on everybody’s mind: I wonder which movies are going to win the Arts Union Science Grants this year.
That’s right! The Arts Union Science Grant Panel has reassembled to award the best in cinema with one of our coveted AUS Grants. In this episode, panel co-chairs Tyler D. R. Vance and Jennie S. Orton gather to discuss the first five of the 10 films nominated for an AUS Grant … oh and they’re also nominated for an Oscar for Best Picture, if you’re into that sort of thing. The discussion is spoiler free, but if you want to be entirely fresh when going into a particular movie, you can find the time stamps below so you can skip to the films you wish to hear about.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com, or join our small-but-might community on Facebook and Instagram.
This episode includes discussions on:
Triangle of Sadness (7:08 – 27:10)
Women Talking (27:10 – 45:35)
Top Gun: Maverick (45:35 – 1:01:43)
The Fabelmans (1:01:43 – 1:20:30)
The Banshees of Inisherin (1:20:30 – 1:39:44)
AUS Future Me Archive: Episode 1 - Hellraiser / The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Big Foot
"We have such sights to show you!" ~ Hellraiser
The Arts Union Science podcast has a new offspring! Welcome to the first episode of the Future Me Archives, a series in which your usual corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) is joined by Steven Harvey to systematically watch the movies that they kept putting off to a future date. For their inaugural voyage, the hapless pair take on an odd double feature: the 80's horror classic Hellraiser (#19 on Steven's List) and the oddly-yet-aptly named The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Big Foot (#10 on Tyler's List). Along the way, the two will discuss taboo's place in horror movies, the difficulty of mixing zaniness with sentiment, and how many Tom Selleck moustaches fit into a Steven Siegal ponytail.
If you would like to comment on this unsealing of the Future Me Archive, feel free to leave us an email at artsunionscience@gmail.com.
"That day, I just killed a man. What he stood for was unstoppable." ~ The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Big Foot
Star Trek Thesis Chapter 3 - Search for Spock
“Aye. And if my grandmother had a wheel, she’d be a wagon.”
After some months of other nonsense, the human journey continues with Star Trek III: The Search for Spock. Join your thesis supervisor (Tyler D. R. Vance) and our resilient thesis student (Daniel G. Schep) as the two of them weather the lukewarm waters of the third entry in Stark Trek’s film franchise. Along the way they’ll salute the Enterprise for its service, pine for the themes and well-preserved hammy-ness that defined the previous entry, and praise James Horner for raising a collection of decent scenes into the highest echelons of Star Trek cinema. Also, if you’re interested in hearing what it sounds like when Tyler and Dan chat without having to worry about sounding intelligent (or even coherent), then make sure to stick around for the after-episode blooper section.
If you’d like to review our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com, or leave us a comment on Facebook/Instagram. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. Other episodes of the Arts Union Science podcast (and its accompanying Star Trek-related theses) can be found on Spotify, Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, or wherever you get your podcasts.
“The more they overthink the plumbing, the easier it is to clog up the drain.”
Art. U. Sci. 7(5): MUBI Conference (feat. Act of Killing, Decision to Leave, and Demons)
The Arts Union Science podcast finishes off Volume 5 with its first ever conference. Buckle up for three presentations on movies from MUBI, the curated streaming service that is sweeping the nation. With each presentation a new speaker will highlight a particular film that can be found on MUBI. These include Kathleen Xu’s presentation on The Act of Killing (a documentary about the horrifying ways that war criminals justify/glorify their acts of genocide), Aditi Ramesh’s talk on Decision to Leave (a Hitchcockian neo noir thriller by Korean director Park Chan Wook), and Steven Harvey’s demonstration on Demons (an ‘80s horror movie with shlocky effects and even shlockier ADR). The films are all available on MUBI, but the conversations can only be found here.
If you'd like to review our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Art. U. Sci. 7(4): Stories We Tell
“Michael was a private person and Diane was definitely not a private person.”
The Arts Union Science podcast returns in artificial Super8 for its penultimate episode of Volume 7. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Nicole V. Stawikowski) as they talk “Stories We Tell”, the 2012 personal documentary by Canadian filmmaker Sarah Polley. Along the way, they’ll reflect on how movies strike differently with age, marvel at how Polley is able to capture the humanity in all of her familial subjects and throw the most umbrageous shade at both “Blonde” and the 1970’s Italian film “Swept Away” … it makes sense in context.
If you’d like to review our submission, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 7, releasing every two weeks (or so) on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“I did sense she was a woman of secrets. But they were artfully hidden.”
Art. U. Sci. 7(3): Come and See
“And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, ‘Come and see’.”
Behold the newest episode of the Arts Union Science podcast. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) as well as returning first author and burgeoning Star Trek expert (Daniel G. Schep) as they discuss something very different than Star Trek: the Soviet-era war film “Come and See”. Along the way, they will marvel at the intensity of this pulls-no-punches war crime movie, stare slack-jawed at the most devasting scene put to film, and still manage to end up briefly talking about Star Trek.
If you’d like to review our submission, you can email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 7, releasing every two weeks (or so) on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.”
Art. U. Sci. 7(2): The Blair Witch Project
“I’m so scared.”
Volume 7 of the Arts Union Science podcast continues with a look into a film that is definitely a “Spooky”: The Blair Witch Project. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and returning first author (Jennie S. Orton) as they chaotically lurch their way through the lo-fi classic that launched the found footage horror craze. Along the way, they’ll touch on the viral marketing campaign that made this film such a sensation, stan the heck out of one Heather Donahue, and relive past trauma from their first forays into horror movies as children.
If you’d like to review our submission, feel free to email us at the artsunionscience@gmail.com, all one word with no caps. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 7, releasing every two weeks (or so) on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“Let's not call him ‘the Captain,’ you illiterate TV people. It's ‘the Skipper.’”
Art. U. Sci. 7(1): The Evil Dead
“You will die! Like the others before you, one by one, we will take you.”
Emerging victorious from a dismal forest near you, it’s a new volume of the Arts Union Science podcast. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Steven Harvey) as they tackle the often imitated but rarely exceeded low-fi horror flick: The Evil Dead. Along the way, they’ll delve deep into the franchise as a whole, lament horror franchises’ obsession with overstaying their welcome, and hear from other superfans of the Deadites, including the fallen angel himself: Satan.
A reminder that you can always email your corresponding author at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 7, releasing every two weeks (or so) on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“Hail to the King, baby.”
Star Trek Thesis Chapter 2 - The Wrath of Khan
"KHAAAAAAAAN" . . . I mean, I had to do it.
Welcome back to another chapter in the expanding Arts Union Science Thesis on the six original Star Trek movies. Return to the subject of Trek with your thesis supervisor (Tyler D. R. Vance) and the world's most game doctoral candidate (Daniel Schep) as they discuss Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Along the way, they'll praise the titular Khan for his hammy brand of vengeance, continue to slander crazy ol' McCoy for his bursts of rage, and pay tribute to some of the best acting in Star Trek.
Episodes of the Arts Union Science Thesis release at the end of each volume, until the inevitable day that the journey ends. Catch them on Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
"It's a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known."
Art. U. Sci. 6(6): Rashomon
“It's human nature to lie. Most of the time we can't even be honest with ourselves.”
The Arts Union Science Podcast returns with the final episode of Volume 6. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Phil Linden) as they attempt to unravel the truth within the lies of Rashomon, the Akira Kurosawa film from 1950. Along the way, they’ll gush about the beautifully thematic setting, ponder on what Rashomon has to say about a modern era where we can’t even agree on which way is up, and somehow spend ten whole minutes talking about King of the Hill . . . surprisingly, it is relevant.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“I don’t care if it’s a lie. As long as its entertaining.”
Art. U. Sci. 6(5): Nocturnal Animals
“Because what right do I have to not be happy. I have everything.”
Another episode of the Arts Union Science podcast rolls into the station; and it’s right on time, too . . . shocking. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Aidan Paskinov) as they explore the twisty-turny psychological thriller: Nocturnal Animals. Along the way, they’ll marvel at the magnificent Michael Shannon, question which version of Jake Gyllenhaal is hotter (i.e. young and intense, or old and grizzled), and record a completely normal Conclusion section in which nothing strange happens.
WARNING: Nocturnal Animals deals with themes of sexual assault and violence towards women. If you find these topics to be triggering, perhaps sit this one out. There are plenty of other episodes that don’t require similar warnings.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 6, releasing every two weeks (or so) on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“I’m just wondering what you really think, Susan.”
Art. U. Sci. 6(4): Jaws
“You’re going to need a bigger boat.”
In the midst of another heat wave, the Arts Union Science podcast returns with an episode on one of the greatest summer films of all time: Steven Spielberg’s Jaws. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Jennie S. Orton) as they dive deep into the history and greatness of this 1975 PSA on staying clear of the water for the rest of your life. Along the way, they’ll praise pretty much every performance on screen (even the guy that says “Whaaaaaat?” real weird), compare and contrast the film to the novel as if this were a 12th grade English essay, and pity the poor members of the film crew responsible for finding and flying a rotting shark across the country.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 6, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“Show me the way to go home. I’m tired and I want to go to bed.”
Art. U. Sci. 6(3): The Sacrifice (1986)
“We wait for something. We hope, we lose hope, we move closer to death.”
With that cheery note, the Arts Union Science Podcast returns with an episode on Andrei Tarkovsky’s final film: The Sacrifice (1986). Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and returning first author extraordinaire (Keegan Turner-Wood) as they unpack the existential dread associated with nuclear holocaust circa in the late ‘80s, with clearly no relevance to the modern day . . . yeah. Along the way, they’ll wade into the film’s relationship to Fredrich Nietzsche, wax poetic about the use of biblical allusion and transcendental film-making styles, and try to figure out if the film contains the worst party in cinema history.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 6, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“Finally, we die . . .”
Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/show/77BHYCLqIcn4ygdfcd3p6Y
Google Podcast:
https://podcasts.google.com/u/1/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8xYmM0NDdlYy9wb2RjYXN0L3Jzcw
Apple Podcast:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arts-union-science/id1585891602
Art. U. Sci. 6(2): The Last Samurai
“Are you a ladies’ man, Bob?”
After a long unplanned hiatus, the Arts Union Science podcast returns with a look into the 2003 “historical” epic: The Last Samurai. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and our returning first author (Sean W. Phippen) as they tackle the complexities of a well-crafted film built upon a shaky, problematic foundation. Along the way, they’ll pour on the praise for Ken Watanabe’s performance, outline the necessary components of a good Big Battle Scene, and accidentally remember that The Rise of Skywalker was a thing.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 6, releasing every two weeks (or so) on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“I will miss our conversations.”
Art. U. Sci. 6(1): Tenet
“You British don’t have a monopoly on snobbery, you know.”
The Arts Union Science podcast returns for Volume 6, thrown backwards through time and space into your pod-catcher of choice. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (David W. Brown) as they tackle the densest Nolan picture to grace the silver screen: Tenet. Along the way, they’ll re-kindle the on-going blood feud between LG and Toshiba users, ruminate on the logistics of reversed temporal entropy and how that impacts the laws of thermodynamics, and appreciate the “good jaw acting” done by Robert Pattinson (or as his friends know him “Bobby P”).
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 6, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“Well, not a monopoly. More of a controlling interest.”
Star Trek Thesis Chapter 1 - Star Trek: The Motion Picture
“How do you define ‘unwarranted’?”
In science, graduate students perform research in order to gather enough data to publish research articles. However, in the background they are also trying to – you know – graduate so they can someday get a job that pays rent and such. That means writing a thesis: a multi-hundred paged tome that chronicles the student’s human journey from neophyte to specialist in a specific field. Here at the Arts Union Science journal, we have been performing a similar task in the background and, today, we begin to unveil it to the world. This is the first chapter of our Arts Union Science Thesis on the original Star Trek films.
Join our Thesis Supervisor and resident Star Trek “expert” (Tyler D. R. Vance) and the primary researcher for this endeavour who’s never seen so much as an episode of Star Trek (Daniel Schep) as they go through Star Trek: The Motion Picture. While discussing this sizeable bag stuffed with contents of mixed quality, they’ll also find time to ask questions (that need answering) regarding the place Solaris has in the hard vs. soft sci-fi continuum, the omnipresence of diopter shots on the bridge of the Enterprise, and the logistics of Scotty’s route efficiency while piloting shuttle pods.
If you’d like to leave a review of our first Star Trek Thesis chapter, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Thesis, releasing intermittently on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“THIS is how I define ‘unwarranted’!”
Art. U. Sci. 5(Grant Panel): The Finale
After much ado about things that vary between nothing and something, we are now at the end of our Grant Panel that seeks to award the Oscar Best Picture Nominees in the same way that some would award quality science. Join our co-hosts Aditi Ramesh and Tyler D. R. Vance as they reveal the winners of the three grants available. Along the way, they'll also recap the . . . eventful Oscar's ceremony, offer up some additional reading for 2021 films that didn't make the cut for a nomination, and get played out during their thank you speeches.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. You can also find our small-but-mighty community on Facebook.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
Art. U. Sci. 5(Grant Panel): The Second Batch
Aaaaand we're back to finish off our first annual Grant Panel. This week, co-chairs Tyler D. R. Vance and Aditi Ramesh discuss the five best picture nominees that they didn't get around to last time, which includes Licorice Pizza, Nightmare Alley, Belfast, CODA, and Drive My Car(e). Along the way, they'll contend with age gaps between romantic leads, Tyler's indefensible hang ups with del Toro, the perfect pairing of black-and-white cinema and old people's faces, the comparisons between CODA and Green Book, and the majesty that is Drive My Car.
If you'd like to respond to our co-chairs ramblings, you can email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can also find us on Facebook. Episodes of the Arts Union Science podcast release biweekly (usually) on Spotify, Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, and more. Our theme music comes from youtubber bklanny.
Art. U. Sci. 5(Grant Panel): The First Batch
Welcome one and all to the first annual Arts Union Science Grant Panel!
This week, co-hosts Tyler D. R. Vance and Aditi Ramesh review five of the best picture nominees to decide if they are ELIGIBLE to receive both an Oscar and - more importantly - one of our prestigious AUS Grants. The movies reviewed this week include Don't Look Up, Dune, West Side Story, King Richard, and The Power of the Dog.
This week is a SPOILER-FREE episode.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. You can also find our small community on Facebook. Our theme music comes from bklanny, Youtube musician extraordinaire.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 5, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
Art. U. Sci. 5(Grant Panel): Introduction
Welcome to the first annual Arts Union Science Grant Panel, where we attempt to doll out grants to our selections from the 10 best-picture nominees.
A grant panel in an actual scientific setting is made up of trained and trusted scientists who are required to judge the applications of their peers for funds. They are allowed to award a certain number of grants, and therefore must be stringent on the quality of science they have received. The goal of the first ever Arts Union Science Grant Panel is to survey the ten films nominated for Best Picture in the 94th Academy Awards and award them for greatness in cinematic achievement. Interested in how we plan to do this? Well then check out the Introduction episode, where your co-chairs Tyler D. R. Vance and Aditi Ramesh will walk you through the (relatively) simple set up they have concocted.
Join us as we dedicated the next two episodes of the podcast to discussing the best-picture nominees. Which films will be given grants to keep doing good work? Which will be left in the lurch? Only time will tell . . .
Art. U. Sci. 5(3): Troy . . . for real this time
“Do not mock the Godsh!”
The Arts Union Science podcast returns for the third episode of our Grant Renewal Volume. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s returning very-qualified personnel (Emily L. Vance) as they sail across the sea with 1000 hot takes on “Troy” – the 2004 epic by Wolfgang Petersen – in tow. Along the way, they’ll exorcise some Trojan horse-like quotes from their noggins, prattle on about the beauty of Troy’s music and action sequences when combined, and throw shade at a literary masterpiece that has been around for thousands of years.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. You can also find our small community on Facebook. Our theme music comes from bklanny, Youtube musician extraordinaire.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 5, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“Do you know what’s there, waiting beyond that beach? Immortality. Take it, it’s yours!” *twist the sword*
Art. U. Sci. 5(2): Eternals
“I have apologized so many times.”
“Not quite enough times. Very close though. I’ll let you know.”
The “second” episode of the “fifth” volume of the Arts Union Science “podcast” has descended from on high to do battle with deviant opinions on a controversial MCU entry. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s returning very-qualified personnel (Sean W. Phippen) as they take a look at Marvels Eternals, a blockbuster superhero film directed by Academy Award Winner Chloe Zhao. Along the way, they’ll workshop a new rating system for MCU directors, fail to decide on which characters could have been cut for the sake of clarity, and pour gas on Sean’s continuing one-sided crusade against Martin Scorsese (P.S. not really, we love Marty).
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them. You can also find our small community on Facebook. Our theme music comes from bklanny, Youtube musician extraordinaire.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 5, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“I don’t wear a cape.”
Art. U. Sci. 5(1B): Halo Reach Part 2 or Can Halo Be a Movie and How?
“Master Chief, would you mind telling me what you’re doing on that ship?”
And we’re back, with the second part of our first episode of our fifth volume of our film podcast *deep breath* Arts Union Science. Join your Corresponding Author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and the triumphantly returning First Author (Brett L. Kinrade) as the two continue their discussion of Halo Reach, a prequel for the beloved video game franchise. This time around, they aim to get get less existential and more practical with the question: “Could Halo be turned into an interesting movie and, if so, is Halo Reach the story make this happen with?” Along the way, they’ll look at the use of documentary-esque cinematics in video games, question the effectiveness of the MCU as the tentpole for “good” characters, and take a host of shots (some cheap but most spot on) at Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 5, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
Our podcast’s music comes from BK Lanny. Check out more of his stuff on his Youtube channel of the same name.
“Sir, finishing this fight.”
Art. U. Sci. 5(1A): Halo Reach PART 1 or "A Series of What-Nexts Until Lone-Wolf"
“This comm has more shrapnel than transceivers.”
Welcome to Volume 5 of the Arts Union Science podcast. In episode 1 of our new volume, we get interactive with our second video game review in the podcast’s history. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and a returning highly qualified personnel (Brett L. Kinrade) as they tackle the existential ennui of Halo Reach: a first-person shooter with more on its mind than head shots. During their journey into the soul-searchy-and-weird, they’ll wonder after the biological drive to continue living, break down the musical choices of Halo’s saddest death scene, and blow out the mic whilst giving Creepers from Minecraft a cannon solidifying nickname . . . and that’s only part 1! Part 2 should be heading your way in a week’s time.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 4, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“I know that we’re losing. I want to know if we’ve lost.”
Art. U. Sci. 4(Special Issue): Christmas Movies and Signal-To-Noise Ratio
As an official finale to both the year and to Volume 4, we have a Special Issue episode for you. Special Issue episodes don’t follow our traditional format, instead taking a step into more chaotic waters to compare an aspect of the science world with an aspect of the film world. In this episode, authors Keegan Turner-Wood, Phil Linden, and Tyler D. R. Vance follow the suggestion of an absent author (Ilinca Georgescu) to compare the Signal-To-Noise Ratio of Science to Movies that MAY be Christmas movies. Which movies are these? Well, see if you can guess from the Simpsons references below.
If you’d like to review our submission, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Episodes form the Arts Union Science podcast can be found on Spotify, Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, and more.
Art. U. Sci. 4(6): About Time
"I love your eyes. I love the rest of your face, too. I haven't even looked further down and I'm sure it's all fantastic."
This week on the Arts Union Science podcast, we finish up Volume 4 (our Discovery-based research volume) with the delightful rom-com "About Time". Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week's first author (Ilinca Georgescu) as they try to relive their favourite moments from this modern classic about love and time travel. Along the way, they'll argue over the logic of the film's timey-wimey nature, make comparisons to "The Time Traveler's Wife" despite the fact that neither author has seen the film, and award Bill Nighy with The Smarmy Dad of the Century award.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Thanks for listening to the Arts Union Science Volume 4, and stay tuned for our Special Issue releasing within the next week or so on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
"I like her more than you already."
Art. U. Sci. 4(5): Point Break(s)
“I am an F-B-I agent!”
The Arts Union Science trundles on with another episode, our penultimate in Volume 4: The Discovery-Based Research Volume. Join our corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Corey A. Stevens) as they take on the X-treme challenge of discussing the dynamic duo of Point Break (1991) and its “special” younger sibling Point Break (2015). Along the way, they’ll get distracted by the raw animal magnetism of Patrick Swayze, reflect on Katherine Bigelow’s career, and get real cantankerous with their old man take of “they just don’t make ‘em like they used to.”
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at arsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Episodes of the Arts Union Science podcast release biweekly, and can be found at Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and many more places.
“You’re a real blue flame special aren’t ya son?”
Art. U. Sci. 4(4): Bone Tomahawk
“Why are you in my breakfast?”
The Arts Union Science podcast returns for its 4th episode in Volume 4: The Discovery Based Research Volume. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and returning first author (Phil Linden) as they tackle the horror / western / . . . rom com(?) indie darling: Bone Tomahawk. Along the way, they’ll try to define the Western genre, ruminate on gore as a legitimate film-making technique, and dole out an incredible amount of praise for both Richard Jenkins performance and Kurt Russel’s facial hair.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 4, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“Say ‘goodbye’ to my wife; I’ll say ‘hello’ to yours.”
Art. U. Sci. 4(3): The Exorcist
“What a wonderful day for an exorcism.”
The Arts Union Science podcast returns for its third episode in Volume 4: The Discovery Based Research Volume. Join our corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Jonathan Cote) as they take a look at one of the latter’s favourite films: The Exorcist. Along the way, they’ll marvel/cringe at the realistic medical procedures on display, fret over the inherent horror of staircases, and figure out how the hell one spells the word “Exorcism” . . . or is it “Excorsism” . . . shoot. If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 4, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
“. . . I’m the Devil. Now kindly undo these straps!”
Art. U. Sci. 4(2): The Last Unicorn
“Now about that WINE!”
The Arts Union Science podcast returns for its second episode in Volume 4: The Discovery Based Research Volume. This week, the film to be discovered is one “The Last Unicorn”, an animated fantasy film from the 1980’s by the prolific and divisive Rankin and Bass productions. Join our corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s co-first authors (Gary F. A. Johnston and Raeanne L. Johnston) as they try to metaphorically dissect the last unicorn with all its whimsy, grandeur, and straight up depressing adult messages intact. Along the way, they’ll invent (but fail to define) the term “Schmendricked”, get caught up on the intricacies of low budget animation, and piss off fans of Jeff Bridges, Tim Burton and the sanctity of scientific controls – all within an hour-and-a-half, no less.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for more episodes of the Arts Union Science Volume 4, releasing every two weeks on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
Art. U. Sci. 4(1): Red Sorghum
"Music Intensifies!!!"
A new volume awaits! This season, our corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) gets treated to movies he’s never seen before. In science, this process is called Discovery-Based Research. At the Arts Union Science, it’s called Volume 4. This week, Kathleen Xu returns as first author to show off a beloved classic from Chinese director Zhang Yimou: “Red Sorghum”. Join your intrepid authors as they tackle the beautiful visuals, resonant themes, and questionable gender politics of this Golden Bear-winning film. Along the way, they’ll wax poetic about hallucinatory realism, the female gaze, and the power of generational tales.
If you’d like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Join us for the Arts Union Science Volume 4, found on Spotify, Google Podcast, Apple Podcast, and more.
Art. U. Sci. Special Issue 3: The NeverEnding Story
"ARTAAAAAAX!"
We're back for the "last" episode of the Iterative Refinement Special Issue, where we look at movies that we have watched over and over again since childhood. This week, your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and returning first-author/first-cousin extraordinaire (Alistair Blinn) take on a blast from the past that both delighted and scared them as youths: The NeverEnding Story. Join them as they touch on everything from the state of children's media today, the importance of having a banger for an opening theme song, and the fragility of the human heart when it comes to drowning horses.
If you'd like to review our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
"To the winch, Wench!"
Art. U. Sci. Special Issue 2: Troy . . . But Not Yet
"Imagine a King that fights his own battles. Wouldn't that be a sight."
So, this is awkward. This isn't a review of Troy. This is a quick blurb that's serving as a place holder for once we eventually get around to reviewing Troy. In the mean time, the next episode should be dropping very soon. We hope to get back onto a more regular schedule now that the summer is done.
See ya soon!
Art. U. Sci. Special Issue 1: Jurassic Park
*saunters up* "That is one big pile of shit."
Kicking off our newest Special Issue, a fan-favourite returns to discuss one of her favourite movies of all time: Jurassic Park. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week's first author (Emily L. Vance) as they peruse the paddocks of the ill-fated dinosaur-containing theme park. Along the way, they'll pay ample homage to one of the best comedies of the last decade (AKA Booksmart), prattle about Laura Dern's amazing performance, and take umbrage with the state of movie recommendations in the modern era.
If you'd like to review our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
Art. U. Sci. Special issue 0: Iterative Refinement
A new special issue, cometh!
It's time to combine the wonders of iterative refinement with the nostalgia of repeat viewings. Join our authors as they revisit movies from their childhood, trying to figure out if these things are getting better with age or . . . not.
If you'd like to leave a review of our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com.
Art. U. Sci. 3(6): Arrival
“Kangaroo!”
After an unexpected delay in which we were off experiencing different portions of our life asynchronously, the Arts Union Science podcast is back with a look at the modern sci-fi classic: Arrival. Join our corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Kris E. Stephenson) as they piece together the intricate cinematic language of Denis Villeneuve’s story of linguists and aliens, living together, mass hysteria! Along the way, they’ll stop to gush over their love of media on media, wonder at the majesty of the sound design, and get all brain-boily over deterministic time travel. If you’d like to review our findings, email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
“Mom, please don't bother with that channel, how many times do I have to tell you those people are idiots.”
Art. U. Sci. 3(5): 1917 and They Shall Not Grow Old
“Some men just want the fight.”
On Episode 5 of the Arts Union Science Interdisciplinary Volume, we take a gander at what total war looked like 100 years ago through comparison of the documentary They Shall Not Grow Old and the action-spectacle 1917. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s first author (Alistair Blinn) as they put their collective (but not balanced) knowledge about World War I to the test against the likes of Peter Jackson and Sam Mendes. Along the way, they’ll question/vindicate the lack of war readiness in the modern era, marvel over the technical advances that allowed both movies to be made, and accidentally give free advertisement for TCL televisions. If you’d like to leave a review of our episode, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
“You’re in the pictures, now!”
P.S. The novel I couldn’t remember in the podcast is called “The War That Ended Peace” by Margaret MacMillan.
Art. U. Sci. 3(4): I, Tonya
“Who would do that . . . to a friend?”
The Interdisciplinary Volume of the Arts Union Science podcast is alive and well with our fourth episode, which spins around the central axis of the film I, Tonya. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s primary author/sibling extraordinaire (Emily L. Vance) as they attempt to relive the multiple versions of the Tony Harding story as seen by the myriad of strange characters that surrounded it. Along the way, the intrepid Vance duo will also discuss the aesthetic pressure inherent to female-centric sports, the tenuous connections the film has to Bo Burnham’s new special Inside, and whether or not Shawn Eckhardt is related to Aaron Eckhart . . . spoiler, he is not.
If you’d like to review our findings, send us an email via artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or outright reject them.
“She really did this.”
Art. U. Sci. 3(3): The Favourite
“Must the duck be here?”
On episode 3 of the Arts Union Science’s Interdisciplinary Volume, our authors take a look at the newest-to-date film from the idiosyncratic Greek director Yorgos Lanthimos: The Favourite. Join your corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and this week’s primary author (Aidan Paskinov) as the two discuss this strange period piece dramedy about three women’s fight for power, love, and vaguely defined morality. Along the way, our authors will also pose strikingly before conversations concerning fish-eyed lenses, the majesty of Olivia Coleman, and the unrelenting horniness of Victorian era dramas.
If you’d like to review our episode, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com.
“*Snort*”
Art. U. Sci. 3(2): Zack Snyder's Justice League
"I need . . . friends."
Don't we all, Barry. Don't we all.
The Snyder Cut of Justice League has been greatly anticipated by a large proportion of the Internet. This week, Arts Union Science gets in on the action. Join your increasingly blockbustered out corresponding author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and our resident DCEU correspondent and true Snyder Academic (Ishan M. Vadera), as they wade into the fray and discuss this reincarnation of the 2017 Joss-tice League. Along the way, they'll touch on Snyder's past films, take stock of the state and future of the DCEU, and wonder openly how the director of A League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is able to sleep at night knowing that his film caused Sean Connery to retire from acting. Stay tuned for an after credits scene!
If you'd like to review our submission, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or out-right reject them.
"I take it back. I wanna die."
Art. U. Sci. 3(1): John Carpenter Double Feature
"I know I’m human. And if you were all these things, then you’d just attack me right now, so some of you are still human."
This week on the Arts Union Science podcast, we begin our Interdisciplinary Volume by bringing in a first author that is only interested in talking science and talking John Carpenter . . . and he's all out of science. Join the intrepid duo of Corresponding Author (Tyler D. R. Vance) and First Author (Phil Linden) as they explore the myriad of ways that aliens can try to take over the world, as seen through the lens of everyone's favourite independent horror director. While comparing (and contrasting) John Carpenter's "The Thing" and "They Live", they will also reminisce about their former movie club, weigh in on paranoia as a theme in horror movies, and sing the praises of Ennio Morricone.
If you'd like to review our findings, feel free to email us at artsunionscience@gmail.com. You can tell us if you accept our findings, accept them with revisions, or out-right reject them.
"Figures it'd be something like this."